115 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 16685871)
1. Finite element modeling of brain tumor mass-effect from 3D medical images.
Mohamed A; Davatzikos C
Med Image Comput Comput Assist Interv; 2005; 8(Pt 1):400-8. PubMed ID: 16685871
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Automated finite-element analysis for deformable registration of prostate images.
Crouch JR; Pizer SM; Chaney EL; Hu YC; Mageras GS; Zaider M
IEEE Trans Med Imaging; 2007 Oct; 26(10):1379-90. PubMed ID: 17948728
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. A comparative study of biomechanical simulators in deformable registration of brain tumor images.
Zacharaki EI; Hogea CS; Biros G; Davatzikos C
IEEE Trans Biomed Eng; 2008 Mar; 55(3):1233-6. PubMed ID: 18334420
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Real-time prediction of brain shift using nonlinear finite element algorithms.
Joldes GR; Wittek A; Couton M; Warfield SK; Miller K
Med Image Comput Comput Assist Interv; 2009; 12(Pt 2):300-7. PubMed ID: 20426125
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Deformable registration of brain tumor images via a statistical model of tumor-induced deformation.
Mohamed A; Zacharaki EI; Shen D; Davatzikos C
Med Image Anal; 2006 Oct; 10(5):752-63. PubMed ID: 16860588
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Rigid 2D/3D slice-to-volume registration and its application on fluoroscopic CT images.
Birkfellner W; Figl M; Kettenbach J; Hummel J; Homolka P; Schernthaner R; Nau T; Bergmann H
Med Phys; 2007 Jan; 34(1):246-55. PubMed ID: 17278510
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Realistic simulation of the 3-D growth of brain tumors in MR images coupling diffusion with biomechanical deformation.
Clatz O; Sermesant M; Bondiau PY; Delingette H; Warfield SK; Malandain G; Ayache N
IEEE Trans Med Imaging; 2005 Oct; 24(10):1334-46. PubMed ID: 16229419
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Reconstruction and finite element mesh generation of abdominal aortic aneurysms from computerized tomography angiography data with minimal user interactions.
Auer M; Gasser TC
IEEE Trans Med Imaging; 2010 Apr; 29(4):1022-8. PubMed ID: 20335091
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. 2D/3D deformable registration using a hybrid atlas.
Tang TS; Ellis RE
Med Image Comput Comput Assist Interv; 2005; 8(Pt 2):223-30. PubMed ID: 16685963
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. A 3D global-to-local deformable mesh model based registration and anatomy-constrained segmentation method for image guided prostate radiotherapy.
Zhou J; Kim S; Jabbour S; Goyal S; Haffty B; Chen T; Levinson L; Metaxas D; Yue NJ
Med Phys; 2010 Mar; 37(3):1298-308. PubMed ID: 20384267
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Site-specific deformable imaging registration algorithm selection using patient-based simulated deformations.
Nie K; Chuang C; Kirby N; Braunstein S; Pouliot J
Med Phys; 2013 Apr; 40(4):041911. PubMed ID: 23556905
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. 3D reconstruction of the pelvis from bi-planar radiography.
Mitton D; Deschênes S; Laporte S; Godbout B; Bertrand S; de Guise JA; Skalli W
Comput Methods Biomech Biomed Engin; 2006 Feb; 9(1):1-5. PubMed ID: 16880151
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Modeling glioma growth and mass effect in 3D MR images of the brain.
Hogea C; Davatzikos C; Biros G
Med Image Comput Comput Assist Interv; 2007; 10(Pt 1):642-50. PubMed ID: 18051113
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. FEM-based evaluation of deformable image registration for radiation therapy.
Zhong H; Peters T; Siebers JV
Phys Med Biol; 2007 Aug; 52(16):4721-38. PubMed ID: 17671331
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Improving deformable surface meshes through omni-directional displacements and MRFs.
Kainmueller D; Lamecker H; Seim H; Zachow S; Hege HC
Med Image Comput Comput Assist Interv; 2010; 13(Pt 1):227-34. PubMed ID: 20879235
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Accuracy of finite element model-based multi-organ deformable image registration.
Brock KK; Sharpe MB; Dawson LA; Kim SM; Jaffray DA
Med Phys; 2005 Jun; 32(6):1647-59. PubMed ID: 16013724
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Multiscale modeling for image analysis of brain tumor studies.
Bauer S; May C; Dionysiou D; Stamatakos G; Büchler P; Reyes M
IEEE Trans Biomed Eng; 2012 Jan; 59(1):25-9. PubMed ID: 21813362
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Generation of 3D shape, density, cortical thickness and finite element mesh of proximal femur from a DXA image.
Väänänen SP; Grassi L; Flivik G; Jurvelin JS; Isaksson H
Med Image Anal; 2015 Aug; 24(1):125-134. PubMed ID: 26148575
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Iterative 3D point-set registration based on hierarchical vertex signature (HVS).
Feng J; Ip HH
Med Image Comput Comput Assist Interv; 2005; 8(Pt 2):279-86. PubMed ID: 16685970
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. A computer simulation study comparing lesion detection accuracy with digital mammography, breast tomosynthesis, and cone-beam CT breast imaging.
Gong X; Glick SJ; Liu B; Vedula AA; Thacker S
Med Phys; 2006 Apr; 33(4):1041-52. PubMed ID: 16696481
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
