These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
42. Technology and cost-effectiveness in knee arthroplasty: computer navigation and robotics. Swank ML; Alkire M; Conditt M; Lonner JH Am J Orthop (Belle Mead NJ); 2009 Feb; 38(2 Suppl):32-6. PubMed ID: 19340382 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
43. Computer-assisted orthopaedic surgery: minimally invasive hip and knee reconstruction. DiGioia AM; Blendea S; Jaramaz B Orthop Clin North Am; 2004 Apr; 35(2):183-9. PubMed ID: 15062704 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
44. Comparison of robotic-assisted and conventional manual implantation of a primary total knee arthroplasty. Park SE; Lee CT J Arthroplasty; 2007 Oct; 22(7):1054-9. PubMed ID: 17920481 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
45. Computer- and robot-assisted total knee replacement: analysis of a new surgical procedure. Martelli M; Marcacci M; Nofrini L; LA Palombara F; Malvisi A; Iacono F; Vendruscolo P; Pierantoni M Ann Biomed Eng; 2000 Sep; 28(9):1146-53. PubMed ID: 11132198 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
46. [Navigator concept. Optimizing the procedure for navigated total knee arthroplasty]. Windhagen H; Thorey F; Ostermeier S; Emmerich J; Wirth CJ; Stukenborg-Colsman C Orthopade; 2005 Nov; 34(11):1125-6, 1128-30. PubMed ID: 16133155 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
47. Design of a surgical robot with dynamic vision field control for Single Port Endoscopic Surgery. Kobayashi Y; Sekiguchi Y; Tomono Y; Watanabe H; Toyoda K; Konishi K; Tomikawa M; Ieiri S; Tanoue K; Hashizume M; Fujie MG Annu Int Conf IEEE Eng Med Biol Soc; 2010; 2010():979-83. PubMed ID: 21096985 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
48. Comparison of Midterm Outcomes of Minimally Invasive Computer-Assisted vs Minimally Invasive Jig-Based Total Knee Arthroplasty. Hasegawa M; Miyazaki S; Yamaguchi T; Wakabayashi H; Sudo A J Arthroplasty; 2017 Jan; 32(1):43-46. PubMed ID: 27503697 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
49. Modeling and evaluation of hand-eye coordination of surgical robotic system on task performance. Gao Y; Wang S; Li J; Li A; Liu H; Xing Y Int J Med Robot; 2017 Dec; 13(4):. PubMed ID: 28471060 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
50. Advances in Computer-Aided Technology for Total Knee Arthroplasty. Siddiqi A; Hardaker WM; Eachempati KK; Sheth NP Orthopedics; 2017 Nov; 40(6):338-352. PubMed ID: 28877327 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
51. Robot-assisted minimally invasive lung brachytherapy. Trejos AL; Lin AW; Pytel MP; Patel RV; Malthaner RA Int J Med Robot; 2007 Mar; 3():41-51. PubMed ID: 17441025 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
52. Obstacle classification and 3D measurement in unstructured environments based on ToF cameras. Yu H; Zhu J; Wang Y; Jia W; Sun M; Tang Y Sensors (Basel); 2014 Jun; 14(6):10753-82. PubMed ID: 24945679 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
54. Computer-assisted transoral surgery with flexible robotics and navigation technologies: a review of recent progress and research challenges. Ren H; Lim CM; Wang J; Liu W; Song S; Li Z; Herbert G; Tse ZT; Tan Z Crit Rev Biomed Eng; 2013; 41(4-5):365-91. PubMed ID: 24941414 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
55. [Experimental research for position accuracy of caput femoris center in total knee replacement navigation surgery]. Zhang J; Nie W; Wang C; Yang Q Sheng Wu Yi Xue Gong Cheng Xue Za Zhi; 2008 Dec; 25(6):1435-7. PubMed ID: 19166225 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
56. [Interest of non invasive navigation in total knee arthroplasty]. Zorman D; Leclercq G; Cabanas JJ; Jennart H Rev Med Brux; 2015; 36(3):158-60. PubMed ID: 26372977 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
57. Precision freehand sculpting for unicondylar knee replacement: design and experimental validation. Jaramaz B; Nikou C Biomed Tech (Berl); 2012 Feb; 57(4):293-9. PubMed ID: 22868782 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]