These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

146 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 16686112)

  • 1. Effect of delay on recognition decisions: evidence for a criterion shift.
    Singer M; Wixted JT
    Mem Cognit; 2006 Jan; 34(1):125-37. PubMed ID: 16686112
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Strength-based criterion shifts in recognition memory.
    Singer M
    Mem Cognit; 2009 Oct; 37(7):976-84. PubMed ID: 19744937
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Strategies of text retrieval: a criterion shift account.
    Singer M; Gagnon N; Richards E
    Can J Exp Psychol; 2002 Mar; 56(1):41-57. PubMed ID: 11901960
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Acoustic interference in a recognition task.
    Lutz J; Wuensch KL
    J Gen Psychol; 1989 Oct; 116(4):371-84. PubMed ID: 2592957
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Investigating the encoding-retrieval match in recognition memory: effects of experimental design, specificity, and retention interval.
    Dewhurst SA; Knott LM
    Mem Cognit; 2010 Dec; 38(8):1101-9. PubMed ID: 21156873
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. The effects of divided attention at study and test on false recognition: a comparison of DRM and categorized lists.
    Knott LM; Dewhurst SA
    Mem Cognit; 2007 Dec; 35(8):1954-65. PubMed ID: 18265611
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Variations in constrained retrieval.
    Alban MW; Kelley CM
    Mem Cognit; 2012 Jul; 40(5):681-92. PubMed ID: 22297425
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Target strength and retrieval-induced forgetting in semantic recall.
    Campbell JI; Phenix TL
    Mem Cognit; 2009 Jan; 37(1):65-72. PubMed ID: 19103976
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Effects of category length and strength on familiarity in recognition.
    Shiffrin RM; Huber DE; Marinelli K
    J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn; 1995 Mar; 21(2):267-87. PubMed ID: 7738500
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. On the dynamic nature of response criterion in recognition memory: effects of base rate, awareness, and feedback.
    Rhodes MG; Jacoby LL
    J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn; 2007 Mar; 33(2):305-20. PubMed ID: 17352613
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Familiarity and retrieval processes in delayed judgments of learning.
    Metcalfe J; Finn B
    J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn; 2008 Sep; 34(5):1084-97. PubMed ID: 18763893
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. The word-frequency paradox for recall/recognition occurs for pictures.
    Karlsen PJ; Snodgrass JG
    Psychol Res; 2004 Aug; 68(4):271-6. PubMed ID: 12827353
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Metacognitive judgments of repetition and variability effects in natural concept learning: evidence for variability neglect.
    Wahlheim CN; Finn B; Jacoby LL
    Mem Cognit; 2012 Jul; 40(5):703-16. PubMed ID: 22282159
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Role of verbal encoding in short- and long-term odor recognition.
    Jehl C; Royet JP; Holley A
    Percept Psychophys; 1997 Jan; 59(1):100-10. PubMed ID: 9038412
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Orthographic processing in visual word recognition: a multiple read-out model.
    Grainger J; Jacobs AM
    Psychol Rev; 1996 Jul; 103(3):518-65. PubMed ID: 8759046
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. The role of decision processes in remembering and knowing.
    Donaldson W
    Mem Cognit; 1996 Jul; 24(4):523-33. PubMed ID: 8757500
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Exploring the role of attention during memory retrieval: effects of semantic encoding and divided attention.
    Lozito JP; Mulligan NW
    Mem Cognit; 2006 Jul; 34(5):986-98. PubMed ID: 17128598
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. The effect of target detection on memory retrieval.
    Dong Y; Xiao F; Meng Y; Ye Z; Tang Y
    Atten Percept Psychophys; 2024 Apr; 86(3):838-854. PubMed ID: 38413503
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. An asymmetry between memory encoding and retrieval. Revelation, generation, and transfer-appropriate processing.
    Mulligan NW; Lozito JP
    Psychol Sci; 2006 Jan; 17(1):7-11. PubMed ID: 16371137
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. On the generality of the revelation effect.
    Westerman DL; Greene RL
    J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn; 1996 Sep; 22(5):1147-53. PubMed ID: 8805819
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 8.