130 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 16686114)
1. Release from generation failure: the role of study list structure.
Higham PA; Tam H
Mem Cognit; 2006 Jan; 34(1):148-57. PubMed ID: 16686114
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Generation and associative encoding in young and old adults: the effect of the strength of association between cues and targets on a cued recall task.
Taconnat L; Froger C; Sacher M; Isingrini M
Exp Psychol; 2008; 55(1):23-30. PubMed ID: 18271350
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Selective access in cued recall: the roles of retrieval cues and domains of encoding.
McEvoy CL; Nelson DL
Mem Cognit; 1990 Jan; 18(1):15-22. PubMed ID: 2314223
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Where is the forgetting with list-method directed forgetting in recognition?
Sahakyan L; Waldum ER; Benjamin AS; Bickett SP
Mem Cognit; 2009 Jun; 37(4):464-76. PubMed ID: 19460953
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. The role of inhibitory processes in part-list cuing.
Aslan A; Bäuml KH; Grundgeiger T
J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn; 2007 Mar; 33(2):335-41. PubMed ID: 17352615
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Can intentional forgetting reduce false memory? Effects of list-level and item-level forgetting.
Lee YS
Acta Psychol (Amst); 2008 Jan; 127(1):146-53. PubMed ID: 17475195
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. What is preexisting strength? Predicting free association probabilities, similarity ratings, and cued recall probabilities.
Nelson DL; Dyrdal GM; Goodmon LB
Psychon Bull Rev; 2005 Aug; 12(4):711-9. PubMed ID: 16447386
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Part-list cuing can be transient and lasting: the role of encoding.
Bäuml KH; Aslan A
J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn; 2006 Jan; 32(1):33-43. PubMed ID: 16478338
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Recency effects in direct and indirect memory tasks.
McKenzie WA; Humphreys MS
Mem Cognit; 1991 Jul; 19(4):321-31. PubMed ID: 1895942
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. The tip-of-the-tongue phenomenon: blocking or partial activation?
Meyer AS; Bock K
Mem Cognit; 1992 Nov; 20(6):715-26. PubMed ID: 1435274
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Are implicitly activated associates selectively activated?
Nelson DL; McKinney VM; McEvoy CL
Psychon Bull Rev; 2003 Mar; 10(1):118-24. PubMed ID: 12747498
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Semantic organization and verbal episodic memory in patients with mild and moderate Alzheimer's disease.
Herlitz A; Viitanen M
J Clin Exp Neuropsychol; 1991 Jul; 13(4):559-74. PubMed ID: 1918286
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. How implicitly activated and explicitly acquired knowledge contribute to the effectiveness of retrieval cues.
Nelson DL; Fisher SL; Akirmak U
Mem Cognit; 2007 Dec; 35(8):1892-904. PubMed ID: 18265606
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Are independent probes truly independent?
Camp G; Pecher D; Schmidt HG; Zeelenberg R
J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn; 2009 Jul; 35(4):934-42. PubMed ID: 19586262
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Memory for internally generated words in Alzheimer-type dementia: breakdown in encoding and semantic memory.
Dick MB; Kean ML; Sands D
Brain Cogn; 1989 Jan; 9(1):88-108. PubMed ID: 2912477
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Age of acquisition's effect on memory for semantically associated word pairs.
Gullick MM; Juhasz BJ
Q J Exp Psychol (Hove); 2008 Aug; 61(8):1177-85. PubMed ID: 18609409
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Retrieval of action phrases: the efficacy of verb cues and noun cues.
Mohr G
Z Psychol Z Angew Psychol; 1992; 200(4):363-70. PubMed ID: 1363014
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Reinstating higher order properties of a study list by retrieving a list item.
Humphreys MS; Murray KL; Koh JY
Mem Cognit; 2014 May; 42(4):570-82. PubMed ID: 24307169
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Generation enhances semantic processing? The role of distinctiveness in the generation effect.
Kinoshita S
Mem Cognit; 1989 Sep; 17(5):563-71. PubMed ID: 2796741
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Probing memory with conceptual cues at multiple retention intervals: a comparison of forgetting rates on implicit and explicit tests.
Goshen-Gottstein Y; Kempinsky H
Psychon Bull Rev; 2001 Mar; 8(1):139-46. PubMed ID: 11340859
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
