128 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 16686114)
21. Theoretical implications of extralist probes for directed forgetting.
Sahakyan L; Goodmon LB
J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn; 2010 Jul; 36(4):920-37. PubMed ID: 20565210
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
22. Generation effects in free recall: further support for a three-factor theory.
McDaniel MA; Riegler GL; Waddill PJ
J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn; 1990 Sep; 16(5):789-98. PubMed ID: 2147443
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
23. The generation effect extended: memory enhancement for generation cues.
Greenwald AG; Johnson MM
Mem Cognit; 1989 Nov; 17(6):673-81. PubMed ID: 2811664
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
24. How does delayed testing reduce effects of implicit memory: context infusion or cuing with context?
Nelson DL; Goodmon LB; Ceo D
Mem Cognit; 2007 Jul; 35(5):1014-23. PubMed ID: 17910185
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
25. Encoding specificity revisited: the role of semantics.
Hannon B; Craik FI
Can J Exp Psychol; 2001 Sep; 55(3):231-43. PubMed ID: 11605558
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
26. The generation effect: a test between single- and multifactor theories.
Burns DJ
J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn; 1990 Nov; 16(6):1060-7. PubMed ID: 2148579
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
27. Prior knowledge and cued recall: category size and dominance.
Nelson DL; Bajo MT
Am J Psychol; 1985; 98(4):503-17. PubMed ID: 4096333
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
28. Retrieval processes in recognition and cued recall.
Nobel PA; Shiffrin RM
J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn; 2001 Mar; 27(2):384-413. PubMed ID: 11294440
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
29. The inadvertent use of prior knowledge in a generative cognitive task.
Marsh RL; Ward TB; Landau JD
Mem Cognit; 1999 Jan; 27(1):94-105. PubMed ID: 10087859
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
30. What is this thing called frequency?
Nelson DL; McEvoy CL
Mem Cognit; 2000 Jun; 28(4):509-22. PubMed ID: 10946534
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
31. Social processing improves recall performance.
Reysen MB; Adair SA
Psychon Bull Rev; 2008 Feb; 15(1):197-201. PubMed ID: 18605503
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
32. Implicit associative responses influence encoding in memory.
Bryant DJ
Mem Cognit; 1990 Jul; 18(4):348-58. PubMed ID: 2381314
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
33. Word-fragment cuing: the lexical search hypothesis.
Nelson DL; Keelean PD; Negrao M
J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn; 1989 May; 15(3):388-97. PubMed ID: 2524544
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
34. Comparing word fragment completion and cued recall with letter cues.
Nelson DL; Canas JJ; Bajo MT; Keelean PD
J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn; 1987 Oct; 13(4):542-52. PubMed ID: 2959738
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
35. Determinants of positive and negative generation effects in free recall.
Steffens MC; Erdfelder E
Q J Exp Psychol A; 1998 Nov; 51(4):705-33. PubMed ID: 9854440
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
36. Age-related differences in the specificity of verbal encoding.
Micco A; Masson ME
Mem Cognit; 1992 May; 20(3):244-53. PubMed ID: 1508050
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
37. Lexical and semantic search in cued recall, fragment completion, perceptual identification, and recognition.
Nelson DL; McEvoy CL; Bajo MT
Am J Psychol; 1988; 101(4):465-80. PubMed ID: 3232723
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
38. Implicitly activated memories are associated to general context cues.
Nelson DL; Goodmon LB; Akirmak U
Mem Cognit; 2007 Dec; 35(8):1878-91. PubMed ID: 18265605
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
39. What types of learning are enhanced by a cued recall test?
Carpenter SK; Pashler H; Vul E
Psychon Bull Rev; 2006 Oct; 13(5):826-30. PubMed ID: 17328380
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
40. Source memory in the absence of successful cued recall.
Cook GI; Marsh RL; Hicks JL
J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn; 2006 Jul; 32(4):828-35. PubMed ID: 16822150
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Previous] [Next] [New Search]
