These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
130 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 16686114)
41. In search of cross-talk facilitation in a dual-cued recall task. Rickard TC; Bajic D J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn; 2005 Jul; 31(4):750-67. PubMed ID: 16060778 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
42. Tests of the generality of the principle of encoding specificity. Postman L Mem Cognit; 1975 Nov; 3(6):663-72. PubMed ID: 24203908 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
43. Sentence encoding and implicitly activated memories. Nelson DL; Gee NR; Schreiber TA Mem Cognit; 1992 Nov; 20(6):643-54. PubMed ID: 1435267 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
44. Does testing increase spontaneous mediation in learning semantically related paired associates? Cho KW; Neely JH; Brennan MK; Vitrano D; Crocco S J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn; 2017 Nov; 43(11):1768-1778. PubMed ID: 28394159 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
45. Reducing false memories via context reinstatement: the roles of encoding and retrieval contexts. Goodwin KA Am J Psychol; 2013; 126(2):213-25. PubMed ID: 23858954 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
46. Aging and semantic cueing during learning and retention of verbal episodic information. Woo E; Schmitter-Edgecombe M Neuropsychol Dev Cogn B Aging Neuropsychol Cogn; 2009; 16(1):103-19. PubMed ID: 18923945 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
47. Intentional forgetting is easier after two "shots" than one. Sahakyan L; Delaney PF; Waldum ER J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn; 2008 Mar; 34(2):408-14. PubMed ID: 18315415 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
49. Strategic effects in associative priming with words, homophones, and pseudohomophones. Drieghe D; Brysbaert M J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn; 2002 Sep; 28(5):951-61. PubMed ID: 12219801 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
50. The deceptive nature of associative word pairs: the effects of associative direction on judgments of learning. Maxwell NP; Huff MJ Psychol Res; 2021 Jun; 85(4):1757-1775. PubMed ID: 32333106 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
52. Altering memory through recall: the effects of cue-guided retrieval processing. McDaniel MA; Kowitz MD; Dunay PK Mem Cognit; 1989 Jul; 17(4):423-34. PubMed ID: 2761400 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
53. Investigating the encoding-retrieval match in recognition memory: effects of experimental design, specificity, and retention interval. Dewhurst SA; Knott LM Mem Cognit; 2010 Dec; 38(8):1101-9. PubMed ID: 21156873 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
54. Transfer of Test-Enhanced Learning. DiMarco D; Marmurek H Exp Psychol; 2022 May; 69(3):119-131. PubMed ID: 35975624 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
55. No retrieval-induced forgetting using item-specific independent cues: evidence against a general inhibitory account. Camp G; Pecher D; Schmidt HG J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn; 2007 Sep; 33(5):950-8. PubMed ID: 17723071 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
56. One step is not enough: making better use of association norms to predict cued recall. Nelson DL; Bennett DJ; Leibert TW Mem Cognit; 1997 Nov; 25(6):785-96. PubMed ID: 9421564 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
57. The effects of categorical relatedness on judgements of learning (JOLs). Matvey G; Dunlosky J; Schwartz BL Memory; 2006 Feb; 14(2):253-61. PubMed ID: 16484114 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
58. The effects of data-driven and conceptually driven generation of study items on direct and indirect measures of memory. Flory P; Pring L Q J Exp Psychol A; 1995 Feb; 48(1):153-65. PubMed ID: 7754080 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
59. Support for an auto-associative model of spoken cued recall: evidence from fMRI. de Zubicaray G; McMahon K; Eastburn M; Pringle AJ; Lorenz L; Humphreys MS Neuropsychologia; 2007 Mar; 45(4):824-35. PubMed ID: 16989874 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]