These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

146 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 16686118)

  • 1. Effects of instruction presentation mode in comparative judgments.
    Shaki S; Leth-Steensen C; Petrusic WM
    Mem Cognit; 2006 Jan; 34(1):196-206. PubMed ID: 16686118
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Remembered instructions with symbolic and perceptual comparisons.
    Petrusic WM; Shaki S; Leth-Steensen C
    Percept Psychophys; 2008 Feb; 70(2):179-89. PubMed ID: 18372741
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Semantic congruity and expectancy in symbolic judgments.
    Banks WP; White H; Sturgill W; Mermelstein R
    J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform; 1983 Aug; 9(4):560-82. PubMed ID: 6224893
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Semantic congruity effects and theories of the comparison process.
    Petrusic WM
    J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform; 1992 Nov; 18(4):962-86. PubMed ID: 1431758
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Short-term memory for the comparative instructions in symbolic comparison.
    Petrusic WM; Gallitto E; Leth-Steensen C
    Can J Exp Psychol; 2014 Dec; 68(4):242-9. PubMed ID: 25528564
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Enhancing semantic congruity effects with category-contingent comparative judgments.
    Leth-Steensen C; Petrusic WM; Shaki S
    Front Psychol; 2014; 5():1199. PubMed ID: 25374556
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. The locus and nature of semantic congruity in symbolic comparison: evidence from the Stroop effect.
    Shaki S; Algom D
    Mem Cognit; 2002 Jan; 30(1):3-17. PubMed ID: 11958352
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Semantic congruity effects in perceptual comparisons.
    Petrusic WM; Baranski JV
    Percept Psychophys; 1989 May; 45(5):439-52. PubMed ID: 2726407
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Metacognition in psychophysical judgment: an unfolding view of comparative judgments of mental workload.
    Petrusic WM; Cloutier P
    Percept Psychophys; 1992 May; 51(5):485-99. PubMed ID: 1594438
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. The role of parity, physical size, and magnitude in numerical cognition: the SNARC effect revisited.
    Fitousi D; Shaki S; Algom D
    Atten Percept Psychophys; 2009 Jan; 71(1):143-55. PubMed ID: 19304604
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. The Size Congruity Effect Vanishes in Grasping: Implications for the Processing of Numerical Information.
    Namdar G; Ganel T; Algom D
    Sci Rep; 2018 Feb; 8(1):2723. PubMed ID: 29426827
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Higher order sequential effects in psychophysical judgments.
    Petzold P; Haubensak G
    Percept Psychophys; 2001 Aug; 63(6):969-78. PubMed ID: 11578058
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Influence of the instructions on the performance and establishment of memorization strategies in space judgments.
    Rodrigues AA; Marques SL
    Span J Psychol; 2006 Nov; 9(2):312-20. PubMed ID: 17120710
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Comparison is not just subtraction: effects of time- and space-order on subjective stimulus difference.
    Hellström A
    Percept Psychophys; 2003 Oct; 65(7):1161-77. PubMed ID: 14674641
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. [Primacy effects in psychophysical judgements].
    Haubensak G
    Z Exp Angew Psychol; 1989; 36(1):42-56. PubMed ID: 2728539
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Automatic quantity processing in 5-year olds and adults.
    Gebuis T; Cohen Kadosh R; de Haan E; Henik A
    Cogn Process; 2009 May; 10(2):133-42. PubMed ID: 18607652
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Strategic influences on implementing instructions for future actions.
    Wenke D; Gaschler R; Nattkemper D; Frensch PA
    Psychol Res; 2009 Jul; 73(4):587-601. PubMed ID: 19360437
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Spatial coding of object typical size: evidence for a SNARC-like effect.
    Sellaro R; Treccani B; Job R; Cubelli R
    Psychol Res; 2015 Nov; 79(6):950-62. PubMed ID: 25476998
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Isolating the effects of symbolic distance and semantic congruity in comparative judgments: an additive-factors analysis.
    Duncan EM; McFarland CE
    Mem Cognit; 1980 Nov; 8(6):612-22. PubMed ID: 6163942
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Conceptual penetration of visual processing.
    Lupyan G; Thompson-Schill SL; Swingley D
    Psychol Sci; 2010 May; 21(5):682-91. PubMed ID: 20483847
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 8.