These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
186 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 16686196)
1. [Comparison of sludge filtration characteristics between a membrane bioreactor and a conventional activated sludge process]. Sun BS; Zhang HF; Qi GS Huan Jing Ke Xue; 2006 Feb; 27(2):315-8. PubMed ID: 16686196 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Characterization of sludge structure and activity in submerged membrane bioreactor. Spérandio M; Masse A; Espinosa-Bouchot MC; Cabassud C Water Sci Technol; 2005; 52(10-11):401-8. PubMed ID: 16459815 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. [Analysis of characteristics of microbial communities in membrane bioreactor and conventional activated sludge process]. Ouyang K; Liu JX Huan Jing Ke Xue; 2009 Feb; 30(2):499-503. PubMed ID: 19402506 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Change in the fouling propensity of sludge in membrane bioreactors (MBR) in relation to the accumulation of biopolymer clusters. Sun FY; Wang XM; Li XY Bioresour Technol; 2011 Apr; 102(7):4718-25. PubMed ID: 21316942 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Filterability of membrane bioreactor (MBR) sludge: impacts of polyelectrolytes and mixing with conventional activated sludge. Yigit NO; Civelekoglu G; Cinar O; Kitis M Water Sci Technol; 2010; 61(3):659-69. PubMed ID: 20150702 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. [Filtration characteristics and mechanism of membrane fouling in a membrane bioreactor for municipal wastewater treatment]. Lin HJ; Lu XF; Duan W; Shen F Huan Jing Ke Xue; 2006 Dec; 27(12):2511-7. PubMed ID: 17304850 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Membrane bioreactor (MBR) sludge inoculation in a hybrid process scheme concept to assist overloaded conventional activated sludge (CAS) process operations. Fenu A; Roels J; Van Damme S; Wambecq T; Weemaes M; Thoeye C; De Gueldre G; Van De Steene B Water Sci Technol; 2012; 66(2):457-63. PubMed ID: 22699354 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. A pilot study on accelerated sludge degradation by a high-concentration membrane bioreactor coupled with sludge pretreatment. Yeom IT; Lee KR; Choi YG; Kim HS; Kwon JH; Lee UJ; Lee YH Water Sci Technol; 2005; 52(10-11):201-10. PubMed ID: 16459793 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Comparison of linear alkylbenzene sulfonates removal in conventional activated sludge systems and membrane bioreactors. De Wever H; Van Roy S; Dotremont C; Miller J; Knepper T Water Sci Technol; 2004; 50(5):219-25. PubMed ID: 15497851 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Biodegradation and Metabolism of Tetrabromobisphenol A (TBBPA) in the Bioaugmented Activated Sludge Batch Bioreactor System by Heterotrophic and Nitrifying Bacteria. Islam MS; Zhou H; Zytner RG Water Environ Res; 2018 Feb; 90(2):122-128. PubMed ID: 29348000 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Effect of disintegrated sludge recycling on membrane permeability in a membrane bioreactor combined with a turbulent jet flow ozone contactor. Hwang BK; Kim JH; Ahn CH; Lee CH; Song JY; Ra YH Water Res; 2010 Mar; 44(6):1833-40. PubMed ID: 20092865 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Removal of sulfonamide antibiotics upon conventional activated sludge and advanced membrane bioreactor treatment. García Galán MJ; Díaz-Cruz MS; Barceló D Anal Bioanal Chem; 2012 Sep; 404(5):1505-15. PubMed ID: 22825676 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Microbial adaptation to biodegrade toxic organic micro-pollutants in membrane bioreactor using different sludge sources. Boonnorat J; Chiemchaisri C; Chiemchaisri W; Yamamoto K Bioresour Technol; 2014 Aug; 165():50-9. PubMed ID: 24791712 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Membrane fouling in a membrane bioreactor (MBR): sludge cake formation and fouling characteristics. Ping Chu H; Li XY Biotechnol Bioeng; 2005 May; 90(3):323-31. PubMed ID: 15800862 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Comparative performance between intermittently cyclic activated sludge-membrane bioreactor and anoxic/aerobic-membrane bioreactor. Wang YL; Yu SL; Shi WX; Bao RL; Zhao Q; Zuo XT Bioresour Technol; 2009 Sep; 100(17):3877-81. PubMed ID: 19362820 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. [Bioaugmentation treatment of atrazine in MBR using genetically engineered microorganism (GEM)]. Liu C; Huang X; Sun W; Wang H Huan Jing Ke Xue; 2007 Feb; 28(2):417-21. PubMed ID: 17489209 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Effluent quality of a conventional activated sludge and a membrane bioreactor system treating hospital wastewater. Pauwels B; Fru Ngwa F; Deconinck S; Verstraete W Environ Technol; 2006 Apr; 27(4):395-402. PubMed ID: 16583824 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Process efficiency and microbial monitoring in MBR (membrane bioreactor) and CASP (conventional activated sludge process) treatment of tannery wastewater. Munz G; Gualtiero M; Salvadori L; Claudia B; Claudio L Bioresour Technol; 2008 Dec; 99(18):8559-64. PubMed ID: 18499451 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Activated sludge model (ASM) based modelling of membrane bioreactor (MBR) processes: a critical review with special regard to MBR specificities. Fenu A; Guglielmi G; Jimenez J; Spèrandio M; Saroj D; Lesjean B; Brepols C; Thoeye C; Nopens I Water Res; 2010 Aug; 44(15):4272-94. PubMed ID: 20619870 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related] [Next] [New Search]