BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

240 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 16686408)

  • 1. Comparison of doppler ultrasound and direct electrocardiography acquisition techniques for quantification of fetal heart rate variability.
    Jezewski J; Wrobel J; Horoba K
    IEEE Trans Biomed Eng; 2006 May; 53(5):855-64. PubMed ID: 16686408
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Extraction of fetal heart-rate signal as the time event series from evenly sampled data acquired using Doppler ultrasound technique.
    Jezewski J; Kupka T; Horoba K
    IEEE Trans Biomed Eng; 2008 Feb; 55(2 Pt 1):805-10. PubMed ID: 18270022
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. The Actifetus system: a multidoppler sensor system for monitoring fetal movements.
    Kribèche A; Tranquart F; Kouame D; Pourcelot L
    Ultrasound Med Biol; 2007 Mar; 33(3):430-8. PubMed ID: 17276580
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. [Foetal electrocardiography (ECG) is an alternative to Doppler ultrasound cardiotocogram (CTG) for antenatal assessment of foetal well-being--preliminary results].
    Reinhard J; Hatzmann H; Schiermeier S
    Z Geburtshilfe Neonatol; 2008 Dec; 212(6):226-9. PubMed ID: 19085740
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. A novel technique for fetal heart rate estimation from Doppler ultrasound signal.
    Jezewski J; Roj D; Wrobel J; Horoba K
    Biomed Eng Online; 2011 Oct; 10():92. PubMed ID: 21999764
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Simultaneous fetal magnetocardiography and ultrasound/Doppler imaging.
    Zhao H; Chen M; Van Veen BD; Strasburger JF; Wakai RT
    IEEE Trans Biomed Eng; 2007 Jun; 54(6 Pt 2):1167-71. PubMed ID: 17549910
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. New Method for Beat-to-Beat Fetal Heart Rate Measurement Using Doppler Ultrasound Signal.
    Kupka T; Matonia A; Jezewski M; Jezewski J; Horoba K; Wrobel J; Czabanski R; Martinek R
    Sensors (Basel); 2020 Jul; 20(15):. PubMed ID: 32707863
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Computerized analysis of fetal heart rate variability using the matching pursuit technique as an indicator of fetal hypoxia during labor.
    Salamalekis E; Hintipas E; Salloum I; Vasios G; Loghis C; Vitoratos N; Chrelias Ch; Creatsas G
    J Matern Fetal Neonatal Med; 2006 Mar; 19(3):165-9. PubMed ID: 16690510
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Real-time signal processing for fetal heart rate monitoring.
    Ibrahimy MI; Ahmed F; Mohd Ali MA; Zahedi E
    IEEE Trans Biomed Eng; 2003 Feb; 50(2):258-62. PubMed ID: 12665042
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. [A DSP-based design method for detecting fetal heart rate signals].
    Yang XF; Li P; Zhang DL; Bian ZZ
    Zhongguo Yi Liao Qi Xie Za Zhi; 2006 Nov; 30(6):413-5. PubMed ID: 17300006
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Adaptive filtering in ECG monitoring of the fetal heart rate.
    Frank TH; Blaumanis OR; Gibbs RK; Wells RK
    J Electrocardiol; 1987 Oct; 20 Suppl():108-13. PubMed ID: 3694088
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Noninvasive monitoring of fetal heart rate during the last ten days of gestation in sows.
    Cohen S; Mulder EJ; van Oord HA; Jonker FH; van der Weijden GC; Taverne MA
    Am J Vet Res; 1997 Nov; 58(11):1285-90. PubMed ID: 9361894
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Dynamic segmentation and linear prediction for maternal ECG removal in antenatal abdominal recordings.
    Vullings R; Peters CH; Sluijter RJ; Mischi M; Oei SG; Bergmans JW
    Physiol Meas; 2009 Mar; 30(3):291-307. PubMed ID: 19223679
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Abdominal electrocardiography in intrapartum fetal heart rate monitoring.
    Kariniemi V; Rosti J
    J Perinat Med; 1986; 14(4):263-6. PubMed ID: 3820035
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Observations on perinatal heart rate monitoring. II. Quantitative unreliability of Doppler fetal heart rate variability.
    Suidan JS; Young BK; Hochberg HM; George ME
    J Reprod Med; 1985 Jul; 30(7):519-22. PubMed ID: 4032387
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Monitoring the fetal heart non-invasively: a review of methods.
    Peters M; Crowe J; Piéri JF; Quartero H; Hayes-Gill B; James D; Stinstra J; Shakespeare S
    J Perinat Med; 2001; 29(5):408-16. PubMed ID: 11723842
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Microprocessor-controlled doppler. A new fetal heart rate monitoring technique.
    Lauersen NH; Hochberg HM; George ME
    J Reprod Med; 1982 Jun; 27(6):352-5. PubMed ID: 7120215
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Fetal heart variability indices and the accuracy of variability measurements.
    Kubo T; Inaba J; Shigemitsu S; Akatsuka T
    Am J Perinatol; 1987 Jul; 4(3):179-86. PubMed ID: 3606751
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. The influence of coincidence of fetal and maternal QRS complexes on fetal heart rate reliability.
    Matonia A; Jezewski J; Kupka T; Horoba K; Wrobel J; Gacek A
    Med Biol Eng Comput; 2006 May; 44(5):393-403. PubMed ID: 16937181
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. A rule-based phonocardiographic method for long-term fetal heart rate monitoring.
    Kovács F; Török M; Habermajer I
    IEEE Trans Biomed Eng; 2000 Jan; 47(1):124-30. PubMed ID: 10646287
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 12.