299 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 16686446)
1. [Stepwise diagnostic workup in general practice as a consequence of the Bayesian reasoning].
Schneider A; Dinant GJ; Szecsenyi J
Z Arztl Fortbild Qualitatssich; 2006; 100(2):121-7. PubMed ID: 16686446
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Improving the diagnosis of bipolar disorder: predictive value of screening tests.
Phelps JR; Ghaemi SN
J Affect Disord; 2006 Jun; 92(2-3):141-8. PubMed ID: 16529822
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. [General practice in a modern health care system--consequences for medical records, education and practice (2)].
Gerlach FM
Z Arztl Fortbild Qualitatssich; 2002 Jun; 96(5):307-11. PubMed ID: 12168551
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Bayes' theorem and diagnostic tests in neuropsychology: interval estimates for post-test probabilities.
Crawford JR; Garthwaite PH; Betkowska K
Clin Neuropsychol; 2009 May; 23(4):624-44. PubMed ID: 19235634
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Using population-based serum drug concentration cutoff values to predict toxicity: test performance and limitations compared with Bayesian interpretation.
Schumacher GE; Barr JT
Clin Pharm; 1990 Oct; 9(10):788-96. PubMed ID: 2242660
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. New patient-oriented diagnostic test characteristics analogous to the likelihood ratios conveyed information on trustworthiness.
Linn S
J Clin Epidemiol; 2005 May; 58(5):450-7. PubMed ID: 15845331
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Sensitivity, specificity, positive and negative predictive values: diagnosing purple mange.
Collier J; Huebscher R
J Am Acad Nurse Pract; 2010 Apr; 22(4):205-9. PubMed ID: 20409258
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. [All that neurologist would like to know about sensitivity, specificity and predictive values].
Gomez de la Camara A
Neurologia; 2003 Dec; 18 Suppl 2():11-8. PubMed ID: 14669103
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Estimating sensitivity and specificity from positive predictive value, negative predictive value and prevalence: application to surveillance systems for hospital-acquired infections.
Kelly H; Bull A; Russo P; McBryde ES
J Hosp Infect; 2008 Jun; 69(2):164-8. PubMed ID: 18448199
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. [Use of Bayesian estimation as a diagnostic tool in clinical practice].
Morita S
Masui; 1993 May; 42(5):733-7. PubMed ID: 8515552
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. The Bayesian approach to evaluation of diagnostic data.
Scandellari C
Ann Ist Super Sanita; 1991; 27(3):385-93. PubMed ID: 1809057
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. [Inappropriate use of diagnostic laboratory tests--a perspective from decision making analysis].
Ulvestad E
Tidsskr Nor Laegeforen; 2000 Aug; 120(19):2294-8. PubMed ID: 10997091
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. The meaning of diagnostic test results: a spreadsheet for swift data analysis.
Maceneaney PM; Malone DE
Clin Radiol; 2000 Mar; 55(3):227-35. PubMed ID: 10708618
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Bayes theorem: Fully informed rational estimates of diagnostic probabilities.
J Am Dent Assoc; 2010 Jun; 141(6):658-9. PubMed ID: 20516096
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
15. Reliability of diagnostic tests.
Gjørup T
Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand Suppl; 1997; 166():9-14. PubMed ID: 9253371
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Modeling the clinical assessment of men with suspected obstructed voiding using Bayes' Theorem.
Caffarel J; Griffiths C; Pickard R; Robson W; Drinnan M
Neurourol Urodyn; 2008; 27(8):797-801. PubMed ID: 18508333
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. A Bayesian sensitivity analysis of out-of-hospital 12-lead electrocardiograms: implications for regionalization of cardiac care.
Youngquist ST; Kaji AH; Lipsky AM; Koenig WJ; Niemann JT
Acad Emerg Med; 2007 Dec; 14(12):1165-71. PubMed ID: 18045892
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. [Statistical principles for the validation of diagnostic procedures. A contribution to quality assurance exemplified by Doppler sonography].
Herrmann F; Neuerburg-Heusler D; Nissen P
Ultraschall Med; 1986 Apr; 7(2):59-69. PubMed ID: 3520817
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Quantifying how tests reduce diagnostic uncertainty.
Coulthard MG
Arch Dis Child; 2007 May; 92(5):404-8. PubMed ID: 17158858
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. [The sensitivity, specificity and predictive value of diagnostic tests].
Rümke CL
Ned Tijdschr Geneeskd; 1983 Mar; 127(13):556-61. PubMed ID: 6843704
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
