138 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 16686931)
1. Advances in dental implant materials and tissue regeneration.
Ellingsen JE; Thomsen P; Lyngstadaas SP
Periodontol 2000; 2006; 41():136-56. PubMed ID: 16686931
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
2. Tissue engineering strategies for the future generation of dental implants.
Moradian-Oldak J; Wen HB; Schneider GB; Stanford CM
Periodontol 2000; 2006; 41():157-76. PubMed ID: 16686932
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
3. Histomorphometric analysis of the osseointegration of four different implant surfaces in the femoral epiphyses of rabbits.
Le Guehennec L; Goyenvalle E; Lopez-Heredia MA; Weiss P; Amouriq Y; Layrolle P
Clin Oral Implants Res; 2008 Nov; 19(11):1103-10. PubMed ID: 18983312
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Biomimetic calcium phosphate composite coating of dental implants.
Schliephake H; Scharnweber D; Roesseler S; Dard M; Sewing A; Aref A
Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants; 2006; 21(5):738-46. PubMed ID: 17066635
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Oral implant surfaces: Part 1--review focusing on topographic and chemical properties of different surfaces and in vivo responses to them.
Albrektsson T; Wennerberg A
Int J Prosthodont; 2004; 17(5):536-43. PubMed ID: 15543910
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Enhanced osteoconductivity of micro-structured titanium implants (XiVE S CELLplus) by addition of surface calcium chemistry: a histomorphometric study in the rabbit femur.
Park JW; Kim HK; Kim YJ; An CH; Hanawa T
Clin Oral Implants Res; 2009 Jul; 20(7):684-90. PubMed ID: 19489932
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Status of surface treatment in endosseous implant: a literary overview.
Gupta A; Dhanraj M; Sivagami G
Indian J Dent Res; 2010; 21(3):433-8. PubMed ID: 20930358
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Histological comparison of bone to implant contact in two types of dental implant surfaces: a single case study.
Shibli JA; Feres M; de Figueiredo LC; Iezzi G; Piattelli A
J Contemp Dent Pract; 2007 Mar; 8(3):29-36. PubMed ID: 17351679
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. In vivo low-density bone apposition on different implant surface materials.
Braceras I; De Maeztu MA; Alava JI; Gay-Escoda C
Int J Oral Maxillofac Surg; 2009 Mar; 38(3):274-8. PubMed ID: 19200692
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Osseointegration of oxidized and turned implants in circumferential bone defects with and without adjunctive therapies: an experimental study on BMP-2 and autogenous bone graft in the dog mandible.
Salata LA; Burgos PM; Rasmusson L; Novaes AB; Papalexiou V; Dahlin C; Sennerby L
Int J Oral Maxillofac Surg; 2007 Jan; 36(1):62-71. PubMed ID: 17027235
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Secondary stability assessment of titanium implants with an alkali-etched surface: a resonance frequency analysis study in beagle dogs.
Strnad J; Urban K; Povysil C; Strnad Z
Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants; 2008; 23(3):502-12. PubMed ID: 18700375
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. In vitro and in vivo performance of a novel surface treatment to enhance osseointegration of endosseous implants.
Chiesa R; Giavaresi G; Fini M; Sandrini E; Giordano C; Bianchi A; Giardino R
Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol Endod; 2007 Jun; 103(6):745-56. PubMed ID: 17197210
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. A 24-week prospective study comparing the stability of titanium dioxide grit-blasted dental implants with and without fluoride treatment.
Geckili O; Bilhan H; Bilgin T
Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants; 2009; 24(4):684-8. PubMed ID: 19885409
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Increased bone formation around coated implants.
Stadlinger B; Bierbaum S; Grimmer S; Schulz MC; Kuhlisch E; Scharnweber D; Eckelt U; Mai R
J Clin Periodontol; 2009 Aug; 36(8):698-704. PubMed ID: 19531092
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Biomimetic dental implants--new ways to enhance osseointegration.
Simon Z; Watson PA
J Can Dent Assoc; 2002 May; 68(5):286-8. PubMed ID: 12066764
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
16. Bone healing at implants with a fluoride-modified surface: an experimental study in dogs.
Berglundh T; Abrahamsson I; Albouy JP; Lindhe J
Clin Oral Implants Res; 2007 Apr; 18(2):147-52. PubMed ID: 17269959
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Biomechanical and histomorphometric comparison between zirconia implants with varying surface textures and a titanium implant in the maxilla of miniature pigs.
Gahlert M; Gudehus T; Eichhorn S; Steinhauser E; Kniha H; Erhardt W
Clin Oral Implants Res; 2007 Oct; 18(5):662-8. PubMed ID: 17608736
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Effect of a multiphasic anodic spark deposition coating on the improvement of implant osseointegration in the osteopenic trabecular bone of sheep.
Giavaresi G; Chiesa R; Fini M; Sandrini E
Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants; 2008; 23(4):659-68. PubMed ID: 18807562
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Biological performance of chemical hydroxyapatite coating associated with implant surface modification by laser beam: biomechanical study in rabbit tibias.
Faeda RS; Tavares HS; Sartori R; Guastaldi AC; Marcantonio E
J Oral Maxillofac Surg; 2009 Aug; 67(8):1706-15. PubMed ID: 19615586
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Bone formation at recombinant human bone morphogenetic protein-2-coated titanium implants in the posterior maxilla (Type IV bone) in non-human primates.
Wikesjö UM; Huang YH; Xiropaidis AV; Sorensen RG; Rohrer MD; Prasad HS; Wozney JM; Hall J
J Clin Periodontol; 2008 Nov; 35(11):992-1000. PubMed ID: 18976396
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
