423 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 16687733)
21. Temporal challenges in detecting balancing selection from population genomic data.
Soni V; Jensen JD
G3 (Bethesda); 2024 Jun; 14(6):. PubMed ID: 38551137
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
22. Allele frequency distribution under recurrent selective sweeps.
Kim Y
Genetics; 2006 Mar; 172(3):1967-78. PubMed ID: 16361239
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
23. Evaluating power to detect recurrent selective sweeps under increasingly realistic evolutionary null models.
Soni V; Johri P; Jensen JD
Evolution; 2023 Oct; 77(10):2113-2127. PubMed ID: 37395482
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
24. Identification of regions of positive selection using Shared Genomic Segment analysis.
Cai Z; Camp NJ; Cannon-Albright L; Thomas A
Eur J Hum Genet; 2011 Jun; 19(6):667-71. PubMed ID: 21304558
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
25. Challenges of detecting directional selection after a bottleneck: lessons from Sorghum bicolor.
Hamblin MT; Casa AM; Sun H; Murray SC; Paterson AH; Aquadro CF; Kresovich S
Genetics; 2006 Jun; 173(2):953-64. PubMed ID: 16547110
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
26. Considering Genomic Scans for Selection as Coalescent Model Choice.
Harris RB; Jensen JD
Genome Biol Evol; 2020 Jun; 12(6):871-877. PubMed ID: 32396636
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
27. Detection of hard and soft selective sweeps from Drosophila melanogaster population genomic data.
Garud NR; Messer PW; Petrov DA
PLoS Genet; 2021 Feb; 17(2):e1009373. PubMed ID: 33635910
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
28. The pitfalls and virtues of population genetic summary statistics: Detecting selective sweeps in recent divergences.
Schneider K; White TJ; Mitchell S; Adams CE; Reeve R; Elmer KR
J Evol Biol; 2021 Jun; 34(6):893-909. PubMed ID: 33185292
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
29. VolcanoFinder: Genomic scans for adaptive introgression.
Setter D; Mousset S; Cheng X; Nielsen R; DeGiorgio M; Hermisson J
PLoS Genet; 2020 Jun; 16(6):e1008867. PubMed ID: 32555579
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
30. Deleterious variation shapes the genomic landscape of introgression.
Kim BY; Huber CD; Lohmueller KE
PLoS Genet; 2018 Oct; 14(10):e1007741. PubMed ID: 30346959
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
31. Soft sweeps III: the signature of positive selection from recurrent mutation.
Pennings PS; Hermisson J
PLoS Genet; 2006 Dec; 2(12):e186. PubMed ID: 17173482
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
32. Controlling the false-positive rate in multilocus genome scans for selection.
Thornton KR; Jensen JD
Genetics; 2007 Feb; 175(2):737-50. PubMed ID: 17110489
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
33. A haplotype method detects diverse scenarios of local adaptation from genomic sequence variation.
Lange JD; Pool JE
Mol Ecol; 2016 Jul; 25(13):3081-100. PubMed ID: 27135633
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
34. Hierarchical boosting: a machine-learning framework to detect and classify hard selective sweeps in human populations.
Pybus M; Luisi P; Dall'Olio GM; Uzkudun M; Laayouni H; Bertranpetit J; Engelken J
Bioinformatics; 2015 Dec; 31(24):3946-52. PubMed ID: 26315912
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
35. Soft shoulders ahead: spurious signatures of soft and partial selective sweeps result from linked hard sweeps.
Schrider DR; Mendes FK; Hahn MW; Kern AD
Genetics; 2015 May; 200(1):267-84. PubMed ID: 25716978
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
36. Detecting Recent Positive Selection with a Single Locus Test Bipartitioning the Coalescent Tree.
Yang Z; Li J; Wiehe T; Li H
Genetics; 2018 Feb; 208(2):791-805. PubMed ID: 29217523
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
37. Effects of Linked Selective Sweeps on Demographic Inference and Model Selection.
Schrider DR; Shanku AG; Kern AD
Genetics; 2016 Nov; 204(3):1207-1223. PubMed ID: 27605051
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
38. Deep Learning for Population Genetic Inference.
Sheehan S; Song YS
PLoS Comput Biol; 2016 Mar; 12(3):e1004845. PubMed ID: 27018908
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
39. Linked selection shapes the landscape of genomic variation in three oak species.
Liang YY; Shi Y; Yuan S; Zhou BF; Chen XY; An QQ; Ingvarsson PK; Plomion C; Wang B
New Phytol; 2022 Jan; 233(1):555-568. PubMed ID: 34637540
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
40. Identifying outlier loci in admixed and in continuous populations using ancestral population differentiation statistics.
Martins H; Caye K; Luu K; Blum MG; François O
Mol Ecol; 2016 Oct; 25(20):5029-5042. PubMed ID: 27565448
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Previous] [Next] [New Search]
