775 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 16687768)
1. A prospective, open-label study to assess the clinical performance of a foam dressing in the management of chronic wounds.
Zoellner P; Kapp H; Smola H
Ostomy Wound Manage; 2006 May; 52(5):34-6, 38, 40-2 passim. PubMed ID: 16687768
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Use of negative pressure wound therapy in the treatment of neonatal and pediatric wounds: a retrospective examination of clinical outcomes.
Baharestani MM
Ostomy Wound Manage; 2007 Jun; 53(6):75-85. PubMed ID: 17586874
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Clinical experience with an antimicrobial hydrogel dressing on recalcitrant wounds.
Wood L; Wood Z; Davis P; Wilkins J
J Wound Care; 2010 Jul; 19(7):287-8, 290-3. PubMed ID: 20616771
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Comparing a foam composite to a hydrocellular foam dressing in the management of venous leg ulcers: a controlled clinical study.
Vanscheidt W; Sibbald RG; Eager CA
Ostomy Wound Manage; 2004 Nov; 50(11):42-55. PubMed ID: 15545697
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Clinical performance of a hydrogel dressing in chronic wounds: a prospective observational study.
Zoellner P; Kapp H; Smola H
J Wound Care; 2007 Mar; 16(3):133-6. PubMed ID: 17385591
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. An evaluation of an adhesive hydrocellular foam dressing and a self-adherent soft silicone foam dressing in a nursing home setting.
Viamontes L; Temple D; Wytall D; Walker A
Ostomy Wound Manage; 2003 Aug; 49(8):48-52, 54-6, 58. PubMed ID: 14631663
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Suprathel, a new skin substitute, in the management of partial-thickness burn wounds: results of a clinical study.
Schwarze H; Küntscher M; Uhlig C; Hierlemann H; Prantl L; Ottomann C; Hartmann B
Ann Plast Surg; 2008 Feb; 60(2):181-5. PubMed ID: 18216512
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. [Experimental in vitro evaluation of the absorption capacity and control of exudate of 3 wound healing dressings].
Torra i Bou JE; Cortés i Borra A; Manresa i Domínguez JM
Rev Enferm; 1998 Oct; 21(242):suppl 2-8. PubMed ID: 10030154
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Using a silver-coated polymeric substrate for the management of chronic ulcerations: the initial Mayo Clinic experience.
Moore RA; Liedl DA; Jenkins S; Andrews KL
Adv Skin Wound Care; 2008 Nov; 21(11):517-20. PubMed ID: 18981754
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. A polyurethane dressing is beneficial for split-thickness skin-graft donor wound healing.
Akita S; Akino K; Imaizumi T; Tanaka K; Anraku K; Yano H; Hirano A
Burns; 2006 Jun; 32(4):447-51. PubMed ID: 16621321
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Evidence review: the clinical benefits of Safetac technology in wound care.
Davies P; Rippon M
J Wound Care; 2008 Nov; Suppl():3-31. PubMed ID: 19252457
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. A multicentre clinical evaluation of Cuticell Contact silicone wound contact layer in daily practice.
Suess-Burghart A; Zomer K; Schwanke D
Br J Community Nurs; 2015 Jun; Suppl Community Wound Care():S35-6, S38-41. PubMed ID: 26052993
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Evaluating the effectiveness of Tegapore wound-contact material.
Jones W; Ivins N; Price P
Nurs Times; 2004 Jan 27-Feb 2; 100(4):66-9. PubMed ID: 14974268
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. [Polyurethane foam dressing. Assessment of its therapeutic effects in the treatment of moderate- to highly-exudative chronic ulcers].
Esteller Gombau H; Martos Cerezuela I; Medrano De Torre FJ; Otero Pérez RM; Sacristán Vela JL
Rev Enferm; 2009 May; 32(5):57-62. PubMed ID: 19552156
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Evaluation of polyurethane dressing with ibuprofen in the management of split-thickness skin graft donor sites.
Cigna E; Tarallo M; Bistoni G; Anniboletti T; Trignano E; Tortorelli G; Scuderi N
In Vivo; 2009; 23(6):983-6. PubMed ID: 20023244
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Use of topical negative pressure with a lipidocolloid dressing: results of a clinical evaluation.
Téot L; Lambert L; Ourabah Z; Bey E; Steenman C; Wierzbiecka E; Malikov S; Charles JP; Vives F; Bohbot S
J Wound Care; 2006 Sep; 15(8):355-8. PubMed ID: 17001944
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Occlusive vs gauze dressings for local wound care in surgical patients: a randomized clinical trial.
Ubbink DT; Vermeulen H; Goossens A; Kelner RB; Schreuder SM; Lubbers MJ
Arch Surg; 2008 Oct; 143(10):950-5. PubMed ID: 18936373
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. [New therapeutic strategies for the treatment of difficult wounds].
Onesti MG; Bitonti A; Fino P; Ciotti M; Scuderi N
G Chir; 2008 May; 29(5):212-20. PubMed ID: 18507956
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Evaluation of a foam dressing for acute and chronic wound exudate management.
Bullough L; Johnson S; Forder R
Br J Community Nurs; 2015 Sep; Suppl Wound Care():S17-8, S20, S22-4. PubMed ID: 26322401
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Managing wound exudate using a super-absorbent polymer dressing: a 53-patient clinical evaluation.
Cutting KF
J Wound Care; 2009 May; 18(5):200, 202-5. PubMed ID: 19440172
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
