373 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 16687908)
1. Assessment of skeletal and dental pattern of Class II division 1 malocclusion with relevance to clinical practice.
Sidlauskas A; Svalkauskiene V; Sidlauskas M
Stomatologija; 2006; 8(1):3-8. PubMed ID: 16687908
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. The mandibular response in Class II malocclusions correction.
Cordua T; Deli R; Giuliante L; Ursini R
Int J Orthod Milwaukee; 2011; 22(3):31-9. PubMed ID: 22031992
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Craniofacial parameters of Syrian children with β-thalassemia major.
Takriti M; Dashash M
J Investig Clin Dent; 2011 May; 2(2):135-43. PubMed ID: 25426607
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Cephalometric morphology of Chinese with Class II division 1 malocclusion.
Lau JW; Hägg U
Br Dent J; 1999 Feb; 186(4 Spec No):188-90. PubMed ID: 10205956
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Dental and facial skeletal characteristics and growth of males and females with class II, division 1 malocclusion between the ages of 10 and 14 (revisited)-part I: characteristics of size, form, and position.
Rothstein T; Yoon-Tarlie C
Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2000 Mar; 117(3):320-32. PubMed ID: 10715092
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Cephalometric characteristics of Class II division 1 and Class II division 2 malocclusions: a comparative study in children.
Pancherz H; Zieber K; Hoyer B
Angle Orthod; 1997; 67(2):111-20. PubMed ID: 9107375
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Dentoskeletal morphology in adults with Class I, Class II Division 1, or Class II Division 2 malocclusion with increased overbite.
Uzuner FD; Aslan BI; Dinçer M
Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2019 Aug; 156(2):248-256.e2. PubMed ID: 31375235
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Cephalometric analysis of changes produced by a modified Herbst appliance in the treatment of Class II division 1 malocclusion.
Sidhu MS; Kharbanda OP; Sidhu SS
Br J Orthod; 1995 Feb; 22(1):1-12. PubMed ID: 7786859
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. A cephalometric evaluation of patients presenting with persistent digit sucking habits.
Moore MB; McDonald JP
Br J Orthod; 1997 Feb; 24(1):17-23. PubMed ID: 9088599
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Improving Class II malocclusion as a side-effect of rapid maxillary expansion: a prospective clinical study.
Guest SS; McNamara JA; Baccetti T; Franchi L
Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2010 Nov; 138(5):582-91. PubMed ID: 21055598
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Class II Division 1 Malocclusion Treated with a Cervical-Pull Headgear: A Case Report.
Shah AH
Int J Orthod Milwaukee; 2016; 27(1):25-8. PubMed ID: 27319037
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Skeletal and dentoalveolar changes concurrent to use of Twin Block appliance in class II division I cases with a deficient mandible: a cephalometric study.
Sharma AK; Sachdev V; Singla A; Kirtaniya BC
J Indian Soc Pedod Prev Dent; 2012; 30(3):218-26. PubMed ID: 23263425
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. A comparative study of cephalometric and arch width characteristics of Class II division 1 and division 2 malocclusions.
Isik F; Nalbantgil D; Sayinsu K; Arun T
Eur J Orthod; 2006 Apr; 28(2):179-83. PubMed ID: 16431898
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Differences in skeletal Class II diagnosis using various cephalometric analyses.
Contardo L; Ceschi M; Castaldo A; Denotti G; Di Lenarda R
J Clin Orthod; 2008 Jul; 42(7):389-92. PubMed ID: 18794575
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
15. Treating Class II malocclusion in children. Vertical skeletal effects of high-pull or low-pull headgear during comprehensive orthodontic treatment and retention.
Antonarakis GS; Kiliaridis S
Orthod Craniofac Res; 2015 May; 18(2):86-95. PubMed ID: 25545335
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Pathognomonic cephalometric characteristics of Angle Class II Division 2 malocclusion.
Brezniak N; Arad A; Heller M; Dinbar A; Dinte A; Wasserstein A
Angle Orthod; 2002 Jun; 72(3):251-7. PubMed ID: 12071609
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Perioral soft tissue evaluation of skeletal Class II Division 1: A lateral cephalometric study.
Lee YJ; Park JT; Cha JY
Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2015 Sep; 148(3):405-13. PubMed ID: 26321338
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Long-term stability of Angle Class II, division 1 malocclusions with successful occlusal results at end of active treatment.
Fidler BC; Artun J; Joondeph DR; Little RM
Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 1995 Mar; 107(3):276-85. PubMed ID: 7879760
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Comparative cephalometric study of Class II division 1 malocclusion between Lithuanian and Jordanian females.
Bader BA; Vasiliauskas A; Qadri AS
Stomatologija; 2008; 10(1):44-8. PubMed ID: 18493165
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. The frequency and distribution of skeletal and dental components in Class II orthognathic surgery patients.
Lawrence TN; Ellis E; McNamara JA
J Oral Maxillofac Surg; 1985 Jan; 43(1):24-34. PubMed ID: 3855314
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
