These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

334 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 16687909)

  • 1. Comparison between Scanora panoramic radiography and bitewing radiography in the assessment of marginal bone tissue.
    Ivanauskaite D; Lindh C; Rangne K; Rohlin M
    Stomatologija; 2006; 8(1):9-15. PubMed ID: 16687909
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Observer performance based on marginal bone tissue visibility in Scanora panoramic radiography and posterior bitewing radiography.
    Ivanauskaite D; Lindh C; Rohlin M
    Stomatologija; 2008; 10(1):36-43. PubMed ID: 18493164
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. A comparison of the diagnostic accuracy of bitewing, periapical, unfiltered and filtered digital panoramic images for approximal caries detection in posterior teeth.
    Akarslan ZZ; Akdevelioğlu M; Güngör K; Erten H
    Dentomaxillofac Radiol; 2008 Dec; 37(8):458-63. PubMed ID: 19033431
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Panoramic radiography in the assessment of the marginal bone level.
    Akesson L
    Swed Dent J Suppl; 1991; 78():1-129. PubMed ID: 1896925
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Agreement between panoramic and intra-oral radiography in the assessment of marginal bone height.
    Molander B; Ahlqwist M; Gröndahl HG; Hollender L
    Dentomaxillofac Radiol; 1991 Aug; 20(3):155-60. PubMed ID: 1808000
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Assessment of trabecular pattern on periapical and panoramic radiographs: a pilot study.
    Pham D; Jonasson G; Kiliaridis S
    Acta Odontol Scand; 2010 Mar; 68(2):91-7. PubMed ID: 20085501
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Comparison of the reproducibility of storage phosphor and film bitewings for assessment of alveolar bone loss.
    Henriksson CH; Stermer EM; Aass AM; Sandvik L; Møystad A
    Acta Odontol Scand; 2008; 66(6):380-4. PubMed ID: 18932094
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Detection of periodontal bone loss using digital intraoral and cone beam computed tomography images: an in vitro assessment of bony and/or infrabony defects.
    Vandenberghe B; Jacobs R; Yang J
    Dentomaxillofac Radiol; 2008 Jul; 37(5):252-60. PubMed ID: 18606746
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Comparison of clinician agreement during visualization of conventional and digitized bitewing radiographs.
    Kimmes NS; Saini TS; Carroll LR
    Gen Dent; 2006; 54(3):182-5. PubMed ID: 16776410
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Comparison of radiographic bone height assessments in panoramic and intraoral radiographs of implant patients.
    Kullman L; Al-Asfour A; Zetterqvist L; Andersson L
    Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants; 2007; 22(1):96-100. PubMed ID: 17340902
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Reliability of marginal bone level measurements on digital panoramic and digital intraoral radiographs.
    Hellén-Halme K; Lith A; Shi XQ
    Oral Radiol; 2020 Apr; 36(2):135-140. PubMed ID: 31004276
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Radiographic assessment of the marginal bone level after implant treatment: a comparison of periapical and Scanora detailed narrow beam radiography.
    Lofthag-Hansen S; Lindh C; Petersson A
    Dentomaxillofac Radiol; 2003 Mar; 32(2):97-103. PubMed ID: 12775663
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Intraoral versus extraoral bitewing radiography in detection of enamel proximal caries: an ex vivo study.
    Abu El-Ela WH; Farid MM; Mostafa MS
    Dentomaxillofac Radiol; 2016; 45(4):20150326. PubMed ID: 26892946
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Comparison of panoramic and intraoral radiography and pocket probing for the measurement of the marginal bone level.
    Akesson L; Håkansson J; Rohlin M
    J Clin Periodontol; 1992 May; 19(5):326-32. PubMed ID: 1517478
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Validation of a dental image analyzer tool to measure alveolar bone loss in periodontitis patients.
    Teeuw WJ; Coelho L; Silva A; van der Palen CJ; Lessmann FG; van der Velden U; Loos BG
    J Periodontal Res; 2009 Feb; 44(1):94-102. PubMed ID: 18973543
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Detection of bone loss with different X-ray techniques in periodontal patients.
    Kim TS; Obst C; Zehaczek S; Geenen C
    J Periodontol; 2008 Jul; 79(7):1141-9. PubMed ID: 18597595
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. A comparative diagnostic assessment of anterior tooth and bone status using panoramic and periapical radiography.
    Le T; Nassery K; Kahlert B; Heithersay G
    Aust Orthod J; 2011 Nov; 27(2):162-8. PubMed ID: 22372273
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Comparison between subtraction radiography and conventional radiographic interpretation during long-term evaluation of periodontal therapy in Class II furcation defects.
    Cury PR; Araujo NS; Bowie J; Sallum EA; Jeffcoat MK
    J Periodontol; 2004 Aug; 75(8):1145-9. PubMed ID: 15455744
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Periodontal disease morbidity quantification. II. Validation of alveolar bone loss measurements and vertical defect diagnosis from digital bite-wing images.
    Hildebolt CF; Vannier MW; Shrout MK; Pilgram TK; Province M; Vahey EP; Rietz DW
    J Periodontol; 1990 Oct; 61(10):623-32. PubMed ID: 2231229
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Panoramic radiography in dental diagnostics.
    Molander B
    Swed Dent J Suppl; 1996; 119():1-26. PubMed ID: 8971997
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 17.