687 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 16689065)
1. The effect of base/liner use on restoration leakage.
von Fraunhofer JA; Marshall KR; Holman BG
Gen Dent; 2006; 54(2):106-9. PubMed ID: 16689065
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Class II composite restorations: importance of cervical enamel in vitro.
Laegreid T; Gjerdet NR; Vult von Steyern P; Johansson AK
Oper Dent; 2011; 36(2):187-95. PubMed ID: 21777100
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Effect of surface roughness of cavity preparations on the microleakage of Class V resin composite restorations.
Shook LW; Turner EW; Ross J; Scarbecz M
Oper Dent; 2003; 28(6):779-85. PubMed ID: 14653294
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Microleakage of Class II composite restorations.
Wibowo G; Stockton L
Am J Dent; 2001 Jun; 14(3):177-85. PubMed ID: 11572297
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. The effect of tooth preparation on microleakage behavior.
von Fraunhofer JA; Adachi EI; Barnes DM; Romberg E
Oper Dent; 2000; 25(6):526-33. PubMed ID: 11203866
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Microleakage of composite resin restorations in cervical cavities prepared by Er,Cr:YSGG laser radiation.
Shahabi S; Ebrahimpour L; Walsh LJ
Aust Dent J; 2008 Jun; 53(2):172-5. PubMed ID: 18494974
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Microleakage and polymerization shrinkage of various polymer restorative materials.
Gerdolle DA; Mortier E; Droz D
J Dent Child (Chic); 2008; 75(2):125-33. PubMed ID: 18647507
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Interactions between cavity preparation and restoration events and their effects on pulp vitality.
Wisithphrom K; Murray PE; About I; Windsor LJ
Int J Periodontics Restorative Dent; 2006 Dec; 26(6):596-605. PubMed ID: 17243333
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. The effects of dentin adhesives and liner materials on the microleakage of class II resin composite restorations in primary and permanent teeth.
Güngör HC; Canoğlu E; Cehreli ZC
J Clin Pediatr Dent; 2014; 38(3):223-8. PubMed ID: 25095316
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Cuspal deflection in premolar teeth restored using current composite resins with and without resin-modified glass ionomer liner.
Karaman E; Ozgunaltay G
Oper Dent; 2013; 38(3):282-9. PubMed ID: 23092141
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Fracture resistance of root filled molar teeth restored with glass fibre bundles.
Rodrigues FB; Paranhos MP; Spohr AM; Oshima HM; Carlini B; Burnett LH
Int Endod J; 2010 May; 43(5):356-62. PubMed ID: 20518927
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. A comparative study of microleakage below cemento-enamel junction using light cure and chemically cured glass ionomer cement liners.
Gupta S; Khinda VI; Grewal N
J Indian Soc Pedod Prev Dent; 2002 Dec; 20(4):158-64. PubMed ID: 12587752
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. In vitro marginal leakage of cervical composite restorations lined with a light-cured glass ionomer.
Sidhu SK; Henderson LJ
Oper Dent; 1992; 17(1):7-12. PubMed ID: 1437685
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Microleakage of glass ionomer restoration in cavities prepared by Er,Cr:YSGG laser irradiation in primary teeth.
Rossi RR; Aranha AC; Eduardo Cde P; Ferreira LS; Navarro RS; Zezell DM
J Dent Child (Chic); 2008; 75(2):151-7. PubMed ID: 18647510
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Penetration of the pulp chamber by bleaching agents in teeth restored with various restorative materials.
Gökay O; Yilmaz F; Akin S; Tunçbìlek M; Ertan R
J Endod; 2000 Feb; 26(2):92-4. PubMed ID: 11194380
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Marginal adaptation of Class 5 composite restorations: retention grooves versus enamel and dentin bonding.
Farid MR; Gomaa HM
Egypt Dent J; 1995 Jul; 41(3):1271-5. PubMed ID: 9497668
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. In vivo evaluation of glass-ionomer cement adhesion to dentin.
Mason PN; Ferrari M
Quintessence Int; 1994 Jul; 25(7):499-504. PubMed ID: 7991772
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Effect of a copal varnish, ZOE or glass ionomer cement bases on microleakage of amalgam restorations.
Manders CA; Garcia-Godoy F; Barnwell GM
Am J Dent; 1990 Apr; 3(2):63-6. PubMed ID: 2076225
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Demineralization inhibition of direct tooth-colored restorative materials.
Gonzalez Ede H; Yap AU; Hsu SC
Oper Dent; 2004; 29(5):578-85. PubMed ID: 15470881
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Effect of low-elastic modulus liner and base as stress-absorbing layer in composite resin restorations.
Oliveira LC; Duarte S; Araujo CA; Abrahão A
Dent Mater; 2010 Mar; 26(3):e159-69. PubMed ID: 20031198
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
