These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

203 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 16689110)

  • 1. Physicians' legal defensiveness in end-of-life treatment decisions: comparing attitudes and knowledge in states with different laws.
    McCrary SV; Swanson JW; Coulehan J; Faber-Langendoen K; Olick RS; Belling C
    J Clin Ethics; 2006; 17(1):15-26. PubMed ID: 16689110
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. [Ethical decision-making at the end of life--knowledge and attitudes of medical students].
    Weber M; Schildmann J; Schüz J; Herrmann E; Vollmann J; Rittner C
    Dtsch Med Wochenschr; 2004 Jul; 129(28-29):1556-60. PubMed ID: 15243903
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Critical care physicians' practices and attitudes and applicable statutes regarding withdrawal of life-sustaining therapies.
    Manthous CA
    Conn Med; 2005 Aug; 69(7):395-400. PubMed ID: 16350482
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Palliative care and other physicians' knowledge, attitudes and practice relating to the law on withholding/withdrawing life-sustaining treatment: Survey results.
    Cartwright CM; White BP; Willmott L; Williams G; Parker MH
    Palliat Med; 2016 Feb; 30(2):171-9. PubMed ID: 26001394
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. End-of-life decisions in the newborn period: attitudes and practices of doctors and nurses.
    Bilgen H; Topuzoğlu A; Kuşçu K; Altuncu E; Ozek E
    Turk J Pediatr; 2009; 51(3):248-56. PubMed ID: 19817268
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Physicians' legal defensiveness and knowledge of medical law: comparing Denmark and the USA.
    McCrary SV; Swanson JW
    Scand J Public Health; 1999 Mar; 27(1):18-21. PubMed ID: 10847666
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Medical futility decisions and physicians' legal defensiveness: the impact of anticipated conflict on thresholds for end-of-life treatment.
    Swanson JW; McCrary SV
    Soc Sci Med; 1996 Jan; 42(1):125-32. PubMed ID: 8745113
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Primary care physicians' knowledge of and attitudes toward the eating disorders: do they affect clinical actions?
    Currin L; Waller G; Schmidt U
    Int J Eat Disord; 2009 Jul; 42(5):453-8. PubMed ID: 19115367
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Looking beyond the law to improve end-of-life care.
    Zuckerman C
    Generations; 1999; 23(1):30-5. PubMed ID: 17144036
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Influence of physicians' life stances on attitudes to end-of-life decisions and actual end-of-life decision-making in six countries.
    Cohen J; van Delden J; Mortier F; Löfmark R; Norup M; Cartwright C; Faisst K; Canova C; Onwuteaka-Philipsen B; Bilsen J;
    J Med Ethics; 2008 Apr; 34(4):247-53. PubMed ID: 18375674
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Physicians' responses to clinical scenarios involving life-threatening illness vary by patients' age.
    Johnson MF; Kramer AM
    J Clin Ethics; 2000; 11(4):323-7. PubMed ID: 11252915
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Attitudes and behaviors of Japanese physicians concerning withholding and withdrawal of life-sustaining treatment for end-of-life patients: results from an Internet survey.
    Bito S; Asai A
    BMC Med Ethics; 2007 Jun; 8():7. PubMed ID: 17577420
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Knowledge of the law about withholding or withdrawing life-sustaining treatment by intensivists and other specialists.
    White B; Willmott L; Cartwright C; Parker MH; Williams G
    Crit Care Resusc; 2016 Jun; 18(2):109-15. PubMed ID: 27242109
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. [Withholding and withdrawal decisions in oncology: legal frame and practice].
    Laude C; Deygas S
    Bull Cancer; 2009; 96(7):777-84. PubMed ID: 19592330
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. The role of law in decisions to withhold and withdraw life-sustaining treatment from adults who lack capacity: a cross-sectional study.
    White BP; Willmott L; Williams G; Cartwright C; Parker M
    J Med Ethics; 2017 May; 43(5):327-333. PubMed ID: 27531924
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. EfCCNa survey: European intensive care nurses' attitudes and beliefs towards end-of-life care.
    Latour JM; Fulbrook P; Albarran JW
    Nurs Crit Care; 2009; 14(3):110-21. PubMed ID: 19366408
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Medical education and law: withholding/withdrawing treatment from adults without capacity.
    Parker M; Willmott L; White B; Williams G; Cartwright C
    Intern Med J; 2015 Jun; 45(6):634-40. PubMed ID: 25828677
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Health care professionals' comprehension of the legal status of end-of-life practices in Quebec: study of clinical scenarios.
    Marcoux I; Boivin A; Arsenault C; Toupin M; Youssef J
    Can Fam Physician; 2015 Apr; 61(4):e196-203. PubMed ID: 26052600
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Physicians' and nurses' preferences in using life-sustaining treatments.
    Carmel S; Werner P; Ziedenberg H
    Nurs Ethics; 2007 Sep; 14(5):665-74. PubMed ID: 17901176
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Legal issues in end-of-life care: perspectives from Saudi Arabia and United States.
    Babgi A
    Am J Hosp Palliat Care; 2009; 26(2):119-27. PubMed ID: 19213927
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 11.