These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

103 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 16689515)

  • 1. Lumbar degenerative classification study.
    Glassman SD; Carreon LY; Dimar JR; Campbell MJ; Johnson JR; Puno RM
    Am J Orthop (Belle Mead NJ); 2006 Apr; 35(4):175-9; discussion 179. PubMed ID: 16689515
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. The Nationwide Inpatient Sample database does not accurately reflect surgical indications for fusion.
    Gologorsky Y; Knightly JJ; Chi JH; Groff MW
    J Neurosurg Spine; 2014 Dec; 21(6):984-93. PubMed ID: 25325170
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Decision making in surgical treatment of chronic low back pain: the performance of prognostic tests to select patients for lumbar spinal fusion.
    Willems P
    Acta Orthop Suppl; 2013 Feb; 84(349):1-35. PubMed ID: 23427903
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. [Stabilizing surgery of degenerative diseases of the lumbar spine].
    Liesegang J; Pfister U
    Aktuelle Probl Chir Orthop; 1994; 43():139-42. PubMed ID: 8092408
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Indication for spinal fusion and the risk of adjacent segment pathology: does reason for fusion affect risk? A systematic review.
    Lee MJ; Dettori JR; Standaert CJ; Ely CG; Chapman JR
    Spine (Phila Pa 1976); 2012 Oct; 37(22 Suppl):S40-51. PubMed ID: 22872219
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Spinal instrumentation for degenerative disease of the lumbar spine.
    Harrison MJ; Sundaresan N
    Mt Sinai J Med; 1991 Mar; 58(2):169-76. PubMed ID: 1857363
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. [Lumbar fusion surgery for degenerative conditions in Denmark 2005-2006].
    Rasmussen S; Jensen CM; Iversen MG; Kehlet H
    Ugeskr Laeger; 2009 Sep; 171(39):2804-7. PubMed ID: 19811749
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. [Adjacent segment degeneration after lumbosacral fusion in spondylolisthesis: a retrospective radiological and clinical analysis].
    Zencica P; Chaloupka R; Hladíková J; Krbec M
    Acta Chir Orthop Traumatol Cech; 2010 Apr; 77(2):124-30. PubMed ID: 20447355
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Uninstrumented posterolateral lumbar fusion for single level isolated disc resorption and/or degenerative disc disease.
    McCulloch JA
    J Spinal Disord; 1999 Feb; 12(1):34-9. PubMed ID: 10078947
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Lateral lumbar interbody fusion: clinical and radiographic outcomes at 1 year: a preliminary report.
    Sharma AK; Kepler CK; Girardi FP; Cammisa FP; Huang RC; Sama AA
    J Spinal Disord Tech; 2011 Jun; 24(4):242-50. PubMed ID: 20844451
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Selection criteria for degenerative lumbar spine instability.
    McCormick PC
    Clin Neurosurg; 1997; 44():29-39. PubMed ID: 10079998
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Long-term durability of minimal invasive posterior transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion: a clinical and radiographic follow-up.
    Rouben D; Casnellie M; Ferguson M
    J Spinal Disord Tech; 2011 Jul; 24(5):288-96. PubMed ID: 20975594
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Are lumbar spine reoperation rates falling with greater use of fusion surgery and new surgical technology?
    Martin BI; Mirza SK; Comstock BA; Gray DT; Kreuter W; Deyo RA
    Spine (Phila Pa 1976); 2007 Sep; 32(19):2119-26. PubMed ID: 17762814
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Clinical outcomes of 3 fusion methods through the posterior approach in the lumbar spine.
    Kim KT; Lee SH; Lee YH; Bae SC; Suk KS
    Spine (Phila Pa 1976); 2006 May; 31(12):1351-7; discussion 1358. PubMed ID: 16721298
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Lumbar arthrodesis for degenerative conditions.
    Glaser JA; Bernhardt M; Found EM; McDowell GS; Wetzel FT
    Instr Course Lect; 2004; 53():325-40. PubMed ID: 15116625
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Indications for surgical fusion of the cervical and lumbar motion segment.
    Bambakidis NC; Feiz-Erfan I; Klopfenstein JD; Sonntag VK
    Spine (Phila Pa 1976); 2005 Aug; 30(16 Suppl):S2-6. PubMed ID: 16103830
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Clinical outcomes and fusion rates following anterior lumbar interbody fusion with bone graft substitute i-FACTOR, an anorganic bone matrix/P-15 composite.
    Mobbs RJ; Maharaj M; Rao PJ
    J Neurosurg Spine; 2014 Dec; 21(6):867-76. PubMed ID: 25325176
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Imaging of lumbar spine fusion.
    Zampolin R; Erdfarb A; Miller T
    Neuroimaging Clin N Am; 2014 May; 24(2):269-86. PubMed ID: 24792607
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Posterolateral fusion of the lumbar spine: rationale, indications, techniques, and results.
    Hadley MN
    Clin Neurosurg; 2000; 47():483-94. PubMed ID: 11197720
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Validation of an administrative coding algorithm for classifying surgical indication and operative features of spine surgery.
    Kazberouk A; Martin BI; Stevens JP; McGuire KJ
    Spine (Phila Pa 1976); 2015 Jan; 40(2):114-20. PubMed ID: 25575086
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 6.