BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

257 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 16690253)

  • 1. The application of mini-implants for orthodontic anchorage.
    Tseng YC; Hsieh CH; Chen CH; Shen YS; Huang IY; Chen CM
    Int J Oral Maxillofac Surg; 2006 Aug; 35(8):704-7. PubMed ID: 16690253
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Factors associated with the stability of mini-implants for orthodontic anchorage: a study of 414 samples in Taiwan.
    Wu TY; Kuang SH; Wu CH
    J Oral Maxillofac Surg; 2009 Aug; 67(8):1595-9. PubMed ID: 19615569
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. The use of microimplants in orthodontic anchorage.
    Chen CH; Chang CS; Hsieh CH; Tseng YC; Shen YS; Huang IY; Yang CF; Chen CM
    J Oral Maxillofac Surg; 2006 Aug; 64(8):1209-13. PubMed ID: 16860211
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. The use of miniplate osteosynthesis for skeletal anchorage.
    Chen CH; Hsieh CH; Tseng YC; Huang IY; Shen YS; Chen CM
    Plast Reconstr Surg; 2007 Jul; 120(1):232-235. PubMed ID: 17572568
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Relationship between vertical skeletal pattern and success rate of orthodontic mini-implants.
    Moon CH; Park HK; Nam JS; Im JS; Baek SH
    Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2010 Jul; 138(1):51-7. PubMed ID: 20620833
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Effect of cortical bone thickness and implant placement torque on stability of orthodontic mini-implants.
    Motoyoshi M; Yoshida T; Ono A; Shimizu N
    Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants; 2007; 22(5):779-84. PubMed ID: 17974113
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Application of orthodontic mini-implants in adolescents.
    Motoyoshi M; Matsuoka M; Shimizu N
    Int J Oral Maxillofac Surg; 2007 Aug; 36(8):695-9. PubMed ID: 17521887
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. A retrospective analysis of the failure rate of three different orthodontic skeletal anchorage systems.
    Chen YJ; Chang HH; Huang CY; Hung HC; Lai EH; Yao CC
    Clin Oral Implants Res; 2007 Dec; 18(6):768-75. PubMed ID: 17868386
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Recommended placement torque when tightening an orthodontic mini-implant.
    Motoyoshi M; Hirabayashi M; Uemura M; Shimizu N
    Clin Oral Implants Res; 2006 Feb; 17(1):109-14. PubMed ID: 16441792
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Effect of mini-implant length and diameter on primary stability under loading with two force levels.
    Chatzigianni A; Keilig L; Reimann S; Eliades T; Bourauel C
    Eur J Orthod; 2011 Aug; 33(4):381-7. PubMed ID: 21062964
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. A comparison of stability between delayed versus immediately loaded orthodontic palatal implants.
    Jackson A; Lemke R; Hatch J; Salome N; Gakunga P; Cochran D
    J Esthet Restor Dent; 2008; 20(3):174-84. PubMed ID: 18533979
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. The effect of drill-free and drilling methods on the stability of mini-implants under early orthodontic loading in adolescent patients.
    Türköz C; Ataç MS; Tuncer C; Balos Tuncer B; Kaan E
    Eur J Orthod; 2011 Oct; 33(5):533-6. PubMed ID: 21131392
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Biomechanical anchorage evaluation of mini-implants treated with sandblasting and acid etching in orthodontics.
    Calderón JH; Valencia RM; Casasa AA; Sánchez MA; Espinosa R; Ceja I
    Implant Dent; 2011 Aug; 20(4):273-9. PubMed ID: 21785362
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Removal torque values of surface-treated mini-implants after loading.
    Kim SH; Cho JH; Chung KR; Kook YA; Nelson G
    Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2008 Jul; 134(1):36-43. PubMed ID: 18617101
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Histomorphologic and histomophometric evaluation of immediately and early loaded mini-implants for orthodontic anchorage.
    Freire JN; Silva NR; Gil JN; Magini RS; Coelho PG
    Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2007 Jun; 131(6):704.e1-9. PubMed ID: 17561041
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Factors affecting the long-term stability of orthodontic mini-implants.
    Motoyoshi M; Uemura M; Ono A; Okazaki K; Shigeeda T; Shimizu N
    Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2010 May; 137(5):588.e1-5; discussion 588-9. PubMed ID: 20451776
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Bicortical vs monocortical orthodontic skeletal anchorage.
    Brettin BT; Grosland NM; Qian F; Southard KA; Stuntz TD; Morgan TA; Marshall SD; Southard TE
    Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2008 Nov; 134(5):625-35. PubMed ID: 18984394
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Evaluation of orthodontic mini-implant anchorage in premolar extraction therapy in adolescents.
    Garfinkle JS; Cunningham LL; Beeman CS; Kluemper GT; Hicks EP; Kim MO
    Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2008 May; 133(5):642-53. PubMed ID: 18456137
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. A prospective clinical investigation of the failure rate of immediately loaded mini-implants used for orthodontic anchorage.
    Luzi C; Verna C; Melsen B
    Prog Orthod; 2007; 8(1):192-201. PubMed ID: 17580417
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Orthodontic mini-implant stability in different healing times before loading: a microscopic computerized tomographic and biomechanical analysis.
    Zhao L; Xu Z; Yang Z; Wei X; Tang T; Zhao Z
    Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol Endod; 2009 Aug; 108(2):196-202. PubMed ID: 19615659
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 13.