These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

257 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 16690253)

  • 1. The application of mini-implants for orthodontic anchorage.
    Tseng YC; Hsieh CH; Chen CH; Shen YS; Huang IY; Chen CM
    Int J Oral Maxillofac Surg; 2006 Aug; 35(8):704-7. PubMed ID: 16690253
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Factors associated with the stability of mini-implants for orthodontic anchorage: a study of 414 samples in Taiwan.
    Wu TY; Kuang SH; Wu CH
    J Oral Maxillofac Surg; 2009 Aug; 67(8):1595-9. PubMed ID: 19615569
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. The use of microimplants in orthodontic anchorage.
    Chen CH; Chang CS; Hsieh CH; Tseng YC; Shen YS; Huang IY; Yang CF; Chen CM
    J Oral Maxillofac Surg; 2006 Aug; 64(8):1209-13. PubMed ID: 16860211
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. The use of miniplate osteosynthesis for skeletal anchorage.
    Chen CH; Hsieh CH; Tseng YC; Huang IY; Shen YS; Chen CM
    Plast Reconstr Surg; 2007 Jul; 120(1):232-235. PubMed ID: 17572568
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Relationship between vertical skeletal pattern and success rate of orthodontic mini-implants.
    Moon CH; Park HK; Nam JS; Im JS; Baek SH
    Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2010 Jul; 138(1):51-7. PubMed ID: 20620833
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Effect of cortical bone thickness and implant placement torque on stability of orthodontic mini-implants.
    Motoyoshi M; Yoshida T; Ono A; Shimizu N
    Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants; 2007; 22(5):779-84. PubMed ID: 17974113
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Application of orthodontic mini-implants in adolescents.
    Motoyoshi M; Matsuoka M; Shimizu N
    Int J Oral Maxillofac Surg; 2007 Aug; 36(8):695-9. PubMed ID: 17521887
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. A retrospective analysis of the failure rate of three different orthodontic skeletal anchorage systems.
    Chen YJ; Chang HH; Huang CY; Hung HC; Lai EH; Yao CC
    Clin Oral Implants Res; 2007 Dec; 18(6):768-75. PubMed ID: 17868386
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Recommended placement torque when tightening an orthodontic mini-implant.
    Motoyoshi M; Hirabayashi M; Uemura M; Shimizu N
    Clin Oral Implants Res; 2006 Feb; 17(1):109-14. PubMed ID: 16441792
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Effect of mini-implant length and diameter on primary stability under loading with two force levels.
    Chatzigianni A; Keilig L; Reimann S; Eliades T; Bourauel C
    Eur J Orthod; 2011 Aug; 33(4):381-7. PubMed ID: 21062964
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. A comparison of stability between delayed versus immediately loaded orthodontic palatal implants.
    Jackson A; Lemke R; Hatch J; Salome N; Gakunga P; Cochran D
    J Esthet Restor Dent; 2008; 20(3):174-84. PubMed ID: 18533979
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. The effect of drill-free and drilling methods on the stability of mini-implants under early orthodontic loading in adolescent patients.
    Türköz C; Ataç MS; Tuncer C; Balos Tuncer B; Kaan E
    Eur J Orthod; 2011 Oct; 33(5):533-6. PubMed ID: 21131392
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Biomechanical anchorage evaluation of mini-implants treated with sandblasting and acid etching in orthodontics.
    Calderón JH; Valencia RM; Casasa AA; Sánchez MA; Espinosa R; Ceja I
    Implant Dent; 2011 Aug; 20(4):273-9. PubMed ID: 21785362
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Removal torque values of surface-treated mini-implants after loading.
    Kim SH; Cho JH; Chung KR; Kook YA; Nelson G
    Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2008 Jul; 134(1):36-43. PubMed ID: 18617101
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Histomorphologic and histomophometric evaluation of immediately and early loaded mini-implants for orthodontic anchorage.
    Freire JN; Silva NR; Gil JN; Magini RS; Coelho PG
    Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2007 Jun; 131(6):704.e1-9. PubMed ID: 17561041
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Factors affecting the long-term stability of orthodontic mini-implants.
    Motoyoshi M; Uemura M; Ono A; Okazaki K; Shigeeda T; Shimizu N
    Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2010 May; 137(5):588.e1-5; discussion 588-9. PubMed ID: 20451776
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Bicortical vs monocortical orthodontic skeletal anchorage.
    Brettin BT; Grosland NM; Qian F; Southard KA; Stuntz TD; Morgan TA; Marshall SD; Southard TE
    Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2008 Nov; 134(5):625-35. PubMed ID: 18984394
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Evaluation of orthodontic mini-implant anchorage in premolar extraction therapy in adolescents.
    Garfinkle JS; Cunningham LL; Beeman CS; Kluemper GT; Hicks EP; Kim MO
    Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2008 May; 133(5):642-53. PubMed ID: 18456137
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. A prospective clinical investigation of the failure rate of immediately loaded mini-implants used for orthodontic anchorage.
    Luzi C; Verna C; Melsen B
    Prog Orthod; 2007; 8(1):192-201. PubMed ID: 17580417
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Orthodontic mini-implant stability in different healing times before loading: a microscopic computerized tomographic and biomechanical analysis.
    Zhao L; Xu Z; Yang Z; Wei X; Tang T; Zhao Z
    Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol Endod; 2009 Aug; 108(2):196-202. PubMed ID: 19615659
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 13.