These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

187 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 16690253)

  • 41. The effect of force, timing, and location on bone-to-implant contact of miniscrew implants.
    Woods PW; Buschang PH; Owens SE; Rossouw PE; Opperman LA
    Eur J Orthod; 2009 Jun; 31(3):232-40. PubMed ID: 19073958
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 42. Immediate loading of orthodontic mini-implants: a histomorphometric evaluation of tissue reaction.
    Luzi C; Verna C; Melsen B
    Eur J Orthod; 2009 Feb; 31(1):21-9. PubMed ID: 19164411
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 43. Implants for orthodontic anchorage: success rates and reasons of failures.
    Rodriguez JC; Suarez F; Chan HL; Padial-Molina M; Wang HL
    Implant Dent; 2014 Apr; 23(2):155-61. PubMed ID: 24614877
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 44. Stability of immediately loaded 3- and 6-mm miniscrew implants in beagle dogs--a pilot study.
    Mortensen MG; Buschang PH; Oliver DR; Kyung HM; Behrents RG
    Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2009 Aug; 136(2):251-9. PubMed ID: 19651356
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 45. Mini-implant for intrusion: is it always justified?
    Upadhyay M; Yadav S
    Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2007 Mar; 131(3):298; author reply 298-300. PubMed ID: 17346575
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 46. Factors associated with the success rate of orthodontic miniscrews placed in the upper and lower posterior buccal region.
    Moon CH; Lee DG; Lee HS; Im JS; Baek SH
    Angle Orthod; 2008 Jan; 78(1):101-6. PubMed ID: 18193973
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 47. Skeletal anchorage in orthodontics--a review of various systems in animal and human studies.
    Janssen KI; Raghoebar GM; Vissink A; Sandham A
    Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants; 2008; 23(1):75-88. PubMed ID: 18416415
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 48. Influence of different implant materials on the primary stability of orthodontic mini-implants.
    Pan CY; Chou ST; Tseng YC; Yang YH; Wu CY; Lan TH; Liu PH; Chang HP
    Kaohsiung J Med Sci; 2012 Dec; 28(12):673-8. PubMed ID: 23217360
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 49. Safe placement techniques for self-drilling orthodontic mini-implants.
    Tachibana R; Motoyoshi M; Shinohara A; Shigeeda T; Shimizu N
    Int J Oral Maxillofac Surg; 2012 Nov; 41(11):1439-44. PubMed ID: 22763139
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 50. Threaded versus porous-surfaced implants as anchorage units for orthodontic treatment: three-dimensional finite element analysis of peri-implant bone tissue stresses.
    Pilliar RM; Sagals G; Meguid SA; Oyonarte R; Deporter DA
    Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants; 2006; 21(6):879-89. PubMed ID: 17190297
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 51. [Clinical study on the stability of palatal implant anchorage].
    Zhao Y; Su YC; Jiang XY; Du J
    Zhonghua Kou Qiang Yi Xue Za Zhi; 2005 Nov; 40(6):463-7. PubMed ID: 16329828
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 52. [Stability of upper molars with the application of implant anchorage].
    Zhu SJ; Zhou YH; Fu MK
    Zhonghua Kou Qiang Yi Xue Za Zhi; 2006 Jan; 41(1):4-7. PubMed ID: 16620616
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 53. AUSOM: a 3D placement guide for orthodontic mini-implants.
    Al-Suleiman M; Shehadah M
    Orthodontics (Chic.); 2011; 12(1):28-37. PubMed ID: 21789288
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 54. Success rate of mini- and micro-implants used for orthodontic anchorage: a prospective clinical study.
    Wiechmann D; Meyer U; Büchter A
    Clin Oral Implants Res; 2007 Apr; 18(2):263-7. PubMed ID: 17348892
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 55. A 4-year prospective clinical and radiological study of maxillary dental implants supporting single-tooth crowns using early and delayed loading protocols.
    Turkyilmaz I; Avci M; Kuran S; Ozbek EN
    Clin Implant Dent Relat Res; 2007 Dec; 9(4):222-7. PubMed ID: 18031444
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 56. Five years of experience using palatal mini-implants for orthodontic anchorage.
    Arcuri C; Muzzi F; Santini F; Barlattani A; Giancotti A
    J Oral Maxillofac Surg; 2007 Dec; 65(12):2492-7. PubMed ID: 18022475
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 57. Factors associated with initial stability of miniscrews for orthodontic treatment.
    Lim HJ; Eun CS; Cho JH; Lee KH; Hwang HS
    Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2009 Aug; 136(2):236-42. PubMed ID: 19651354
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 58. Soft bone primary stability of 3 different miniscrews for orthodontic anchorage: a resonance frequency investigation.
    Veltri M; Balleri B; Goracci C; Giorgetti R; Balleri P; Ferrari M
    Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2009 May; 135(5):642-8. PubMed ID: 19409347
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 59. Microscrew implant anchorage sliding mechanics.
    Park HS; Kwon OW; Sung JH
    World J Orthod; 2005; 6(3):265-74. PubMed ID: 16164110
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 60. Orthodontic mini-implant diameter does not affect in-situ linear microcrack generation in the mandible or the maxilla.
    Liu SS; Cruz-Marroquin E; Sun J; Stewart KT; Allen MR
    Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2012 Dec; 142(6):768-73. PubMed ID: 23195362
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 10.