These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

221 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 16690253)

  • 61. Horizontal and vertical resistance strength of infrazygomatic mini-implants.
    Wu JH; Lu PC; Lee KT; Du JK; Wang HC; Chen CM
    Int J Oral Maxillofac Surg; 2011 May; 40(5):521-5. PubMed ID: 21333495
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 62. Cortical bone thickness in the buccal posterior region for orthodontic mini-implants.
    Ono A; Motoyoshi M; Shimizu N
    Int J Oral Maxillofac Surg; 2008 Apr; 37(4):334-40. PubMed ID: 18295454
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 63. Horizontal pull-out strength of orthodontic infrazygomatic mini-implant: an in vitro study.
    Chen CM; Wu JH; Lu PC; Wang HC; Lee HE; Wang CH; Du JK
    Implant Dent; 2011 Apr; 20(2):139-45. PubMed ID: 21448023
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 64. Orthodontic extrusion of the lower third molar with an orthodontic mini implant.
    Park W; Park JS; Kim YM; Yu HS; Kim KD
    Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol Endod; 2010 Oct; 110(4):e1-6. PubMed ID: 20674416
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 65. In vitro evaluation of insertion and removal torques of orthodontic mini-implants.
    Pithon MM; Nojima MG; Nojima LI
    Int J Oral Maxillofac Surg; 2011 Jan; 40(1):80-5. PubMed ID: 21050721
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 66. Failure rates of mini-implants placed in the infrazygomatic region.
    Uribe F; Mehr R; Mathur A; Janakiraman N; Allareddy V
    Prog Orthod; 2015; 16():31. PubMed ID: 26373730
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 67. Factors Affecting the Clinical Success Rate of Miniscrew Implants for Orthodontic Treatment.
    Jing Z; Wu Y; Jiang W; Zhao L; Jing D; Zhang N; Cao X; Xu Z; Zhao Z
    Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants; 2016; 31(4):835-41. PubMed ID: 27447150
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 68. Mini-implants for direct or indirect orthodontic anchorage.
    Ren Y
    Evid Based Dent; 2009; 10(4):113. PubMed ID: 20023620
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 69. A prospective study of the risk factors associated with failure of mini-implants used for orthodontic anchorage.
    Cheng SJ; Tseng IY; Lee JJ; Kok SH
    Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants; 2004; 19(1):100-6. PubMed ID: 14982362
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 70. Assessment of mini-implant displacement using cone beam computed tomography.
    Alves M; Baratieri C; Nojima LI
    Clin Oral Implants Res; 2011 Oct; 22(10):1151-1156. PubMed ID: 21303419
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 71. Evaluation of primary stability of inclined orthodontic mini-implants.
    Inaba M
    J Oral Sci; 2009 Sep; 51(3):347-53. PubMed ID: 19776501
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 72. Recognizing the peak bone mass (age 30) as a cutoff point to achieve the success of orthodontic implants.
    Tseng YC; Tsai CC; Cheng JH; Chou ST; Pan CY; Chen PH; Chen CM
    Odontology; 2020 Jul; 108(3):503-510. PubMed ID: 31802301
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 73. Impact of insertion depth and predrilling diameter on primary stability of orthodontic mini-implants.
    Wilmes B; Drescher D
    Angle Orthod; 2009 Jul; 79(4):609-14. PubMed ID: 19537867
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 74. Assessment of Insertion Torque of Mini-implant and Its Correlation with Primary Stability and Pain Levels in Orthodontic Patients.
    Sreenivasagan S; Subramanian AK; Nivethigaa B
    J Contemp Dent Pract; 2021 Jan; 22(1):84-88. PubMed ID: 34002715
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 75. Retrieval analysis of immediately loaded orthodontic mini-implants: material and tissue characterization.
    Vasoglou M; Chrysomali E; Zinelis S; Bitsanis I; Haralambakis N; Makou M; Epsilonliades G
    Eur J Orthod; 2014 Dec; 36(6):683-9. PubMed ID: 24375757
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 76. Considerations on the Use of a Temporary Anchorage Device for Improving Longevity and Success.
    Forghany M; Vaderhobli RM
    J Long Term Eff Med Implants; 2019; 29(2):87-90. PubMed ID: 32464016
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 77. Evaluation of the success and complication rates of self-drilling orthodontic mini-implants.
    Gurdan Z; Szalma J
    Niger J Clin Pract; 2018 May; 21(5):546-552. PubMed ID: 29735852
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 78. Guidelines for success in placement of orthodontic mini-implants.
    Luzi C; Verna C; Melsen B
    J Clin Orthod; 2009 Jan; 43(1):39-44. PubMed ID: 19276573
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 79. Tensile mechanical properties of swine cortical mandibular bone.
    Brosh T; Rozitsky D; Geron S; Pilo R
    PLoS One; 2014; 9(12):e113229. PubMed ID: 25463971
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 80. Flexural strength of mini-implants developed for Herbst appliance skeletal anchorage. A study in Minipigs br1 cadavers.
    Lopes KB; Dominguez GC; Biasi C; Rossi JL
    Dental Press J Orthod; 2013; 18(6):124-9. PubMed ID: 24351160
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 12.