275 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 16690479)
1. Correlation of workload with disagreement and amendment rates in surgical pathology and nongynecologic cytology.
Renshaw AA; Gould EW
Am J Clin Pathol; 2006 Jun; 125(6):820-2. PubMed ID: 16690479
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Comparison of disagreement and amendment rates by tissue type and diagnosis: identifying cases for directed blinded review.
Renshaw AA; Gould EW
Am J Clin Pathol; 2006 Nov; 126(5):736-9. PubMed ID: 17050070
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Measuring the value of review of pathology material by a second pathologist.
Renshaw AA; Gould EW
Am J Clin Pathol; 2006 May; 125(5):737-9. PubMed ID: 16707375
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Agreement and error rates using blinded review to evaluate surgical pathology of biopsy material.
Renshaw AA; Cartagena N; Granter SR; Gould EW
Am J Clin Pathol; 2003 Jun; 119(6):797-800. PubMed ID: 12817425
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Measuring errors in surgical pathology in real-life practice: defining what does and does not matter.
Renshaw AA; Gould EW
Am J Clin Pathol; 2007 Jan; 127(1):144-52. PubMed ID: 17145620
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Clinical impact and frequency of anatomic pathology errors in cancer diagnoses.
Raab SS; Grzybicki DM; Janosky JE; Zarbo RJ; Meier FA; Jensen C; Geyer SJ
Cancer; 2005 Nov; 104(10):2205-13. PubMed ID: 16216029
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Amended reports in surgical pathology and implications for diagnostic error detection and avoidance: a College of American Pathologists Q-probes study of 1,667,547 accessioned cases in 359 laboratories.
Nakhleh RE; Zarbo RJ
Arch Pathol Lab Med; 1998 Apr; 122(4):303-9. PubMed ID: 9648896
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Mandatory second opinion in surgical pathology referral material: clinical consequences of major disagreements.
Manion E; Cohen MB; Weydert J
Am J Surg Pathol; 2008 May; 32(5):732-7. PubMed ID: 18360282
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Study of amended reports to evaluate and improve surgical pathology processes.
Meier FA; Varney RC; Zarbo RJ
Adv Anat Pathol; 2011 Sep; 18(5):406-13. PubMed ID: 21841408
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Measuring and reporting errors in surgical pathology. Lessons from gynecologic cytology.
Renshaw AA
Am J Clin Pathol; 2001 Mar; 115(3):338-41. PubMed ID: 11242788
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Virtual slide telepathology for an academic teaching hospital surgical pathology quality assurance program.
Graham AR; Bhattacharyya AK; Scott KM; Lian F; Grasso LL; Richter LC; Carpenter JB; Chiang S; Henderson JT; Lopez AM; Barker GP; Weinstein RS
Hum Pathol; 2009 Aug; 40(8):1129-36. PubMed ID: 19540562
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Comparison of disagreement and error rates for three types of interdepartmental consultations.
Renshaw AA; Gould EW
Am J Clin Pathol; 2005 Dec; 124(6):878-82. PubMed ID: 16416737
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Regarding workload and error rates in anatomic pathology.
Vollmer RT
Am J Clin Pathol; 2006 Dec; 126(6):833. PubMed ID: 17153774
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
14. Double slide viewing as a cytology quality improvement initiative.
Raab SS; Stone CH; Jensen CS; Zarbo RJ; Meier FA; Grzybicki DM; Vrbin CM; Ohori NP; Dahmoush L
Am J Clin Pathol; 2006 Apr; 125(4):526-33. PubMed ID: 16627263
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Detection and classification of diagnostic discrepancies (errors) in surgical pathology.
Roy JE; Hunt JL
Adv Anat Pathol; 2010 Sep; 17(5):359-65. PubMed ID: 20733354
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Cytohistologic discrepancies: a means to improve pathology practice and patient outcomes.
Clary KM; Silverman JF; Liu Y; Sturgis CD; Grzybicki DM; Mahood LK; Raab SS
Am J Clin Pathol; 2002 Apr; 117(4):567-73. PubMed ID: 11939731
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Database construction for improving patient safety by examining pathology errors.
Grzybicki DM; Turcsanyi B; Becich MJ; Gupta D; Gilbertson JR; Raab SS
Am J Clin Pathol; 2005 Oct; 124(4):500-9. PubMed ID: 16146808
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Analysis of addenda in anatomic pathology as a quality monitoring initiative.
Babwah JP; Khalifa M; Rowsell C
Arch Pathol Lab Med; 2014 Nov; 138(11):1514-9. PubMed ID: 25357114
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. [Quality assurance for histodiagnosis and cytodiagnosis with a model of proficiency testing].
Takahashi M; Shimada O; Shirasawa K; Kimura M
Rinsho Byori; 1993 May; 41(5):596-9. PubMed ID: 8350531
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Recent trends in quality, patient safety, and error reduction in nongyn cytology.
Silverman JF
Adv Anat Pathol; 2010 Nov; 17(6):437-44. PubMed ID: 20966649
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
