These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

116 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 16692411)

  • 1. Quantitative Perimetry; Practical Devices and Errors.
    Walker CB
    Trans Am Ophthalmol Soc; 1917; 15():166-93. PubMed ID: 16692411
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. [In kinetic perimetry high refractive errors also influence the isopter position outside the central 30 degrees].
    Niederhauser S; Mojon DS
    Klin Monbl Augenheilkd; 2002 Apr; 219(4):201-5. PubMed ID: 12022001
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Feasibility and outcome of automated static perimetry in children using continuous light increment perimetry (CLIP) and fast threshold strategy.
    Wabbels BK; Wilscher S
    Acta Ophthalmol Scand; 2005 Dec; 83(6):664-9. PubMed ID: 16396642
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Refractive errors and automated perimetry: discussion and case studies.
    Gaffney M
    J Ophthalmic Nurs Technol; 1993; 12(4):167-71. PubMed ID: 8301674
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. [15 years automated perimetry--where does the path lead?].
    Lachenmayr B; Lund OE
    Klin Monbl Augenheilkd; 1994 Dec; 205(6):325-8. PubMed ID: 7869681
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. [Poly-static quantitative perimetry for detection of open angle glaucoma].
    Lai Z; Lao Y; Ai F
    Zhonghua Yan Ke Za Zhi; 2000 Mar; 36(2):129-30. PubMed ID: 11853601
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. High spatial resolution automated perimetry in glaucoma.
    Westcott MC; McNaught AI; Crabb DP; Fitzke FW; Hitchings RA
    Br J Ophthalmol; 1997 Jun; 81(6):452-9. PubMed ID: 9274408
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Quantitative evaluation of manual kinetic perimetry using computer simulation.
    Shapiro LR; Johnson CA
    Appl Opt; 1990 Apr; 29(10):1445-50. PubMed ID: 20563024
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Comparison of Three Visual Field Tests in Children: Frequency Doubling Test, 24-2 and 30-2 SITA Perimetry.
    Han S; Baek SH; Kim US
    Semin Ophthalmol; 2017; 32(5):647-650. PubMed ID: 27404791
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. [The significance of static quantitative threshold perimetry and the barring of blind spot in kinetic quantitative perimetry in chronic open angle glaucoma].
    Ge JA
    Zhonghua Yan Ke Za Zhi; 1989 Mar; 25(2):70-4. PubMed ID: 2507255
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. [Some findings of a practical nature on the clinical indications of mesopic perimetry].
    Montaldi M; Ciurlo G
    Arch Maragliano Patol Clin; 1965 Dec; 21(6):751-4. PubMed ID: 5898816
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. [Quantitative perimetry and glaucoma].
    Demailly P; Barrault O
    J Fr Ophtalmol; 1986; 9(3):211-6. PubMed ID: 3772032
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Static quantitative perimetry.
    Obstfeld H
    Br J Physiol Opt; 1973; 28(1):47-66. PubMed ID: 4792006
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. [Cartographic errors in perimetry].
    Papoulis C; Weber J
    Klin Monbl Augenheilkd; 1991 Feb; 198(2):108-11. PubMed ID: 2041363
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. [FDT versus automated standard perimetry in healthy subjects].
    ChiseliĊ£a D; Ioana MC; Danielescu C; Mihaela NM
    Oftalmologia; 2006; 50(3):99-104. PubMed ID: 17144515
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Random dot motion perimetry in patients with glaucoma and in normal subjects.
    Wall M; Ketoff KM
    Am J Ophthalmol; 1995 Nov; 120(5):587-96. PubMed ID: 7485360
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. [Perimetry yesterday and today].
    Lachenmayr B
    Klin Monbl Augenheilkd; 1988 Jul; 193(1):80-92. PubMed ID: 3054254
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Correcting lens system for perimetry.
    Henson DB; Earlam RA
    Ophthalmic Physiol Opt; 1995 Jan; 15(1):59-62. PubMed ID: 7724222
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Random dot motion stimuli are more sensitive than light stimuli for detection of visual field loss in ocular hypertension patients.
    Wall M; Jennisch CS
    Optom Vis Sci; 1999 Aug; 76(8):550-7. PubMed ID: 10472961
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. [Current practical perimetry].
    Lavergne G
    Annee Ther Clin Ophtalmol; 1985; 36():171-5. PubMed ID: 3837641
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 6.