These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

124 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 16696455)

  • 1. Computer-aided detection, in its present form, is not an effective aid for screening mammography. Against the proposition.
    Kallergi M
    Med Phys; 2006 Apr; 33(4):812-4. PubMed ID: 16696455
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Computer-aided detection, in its present form, is not an effective aid for screening mammography. For the proposition.
    Nishikawa RM
    Med Phys; 2006 Apr; 33(4):811-2. PubMed ID: 16696454
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Clinical versus research approach to breast cancer detection with CAD: where are we now?
    Brem RF
    AJR Am J Roentgenol; 2007 Jan; 188(1):234-5. PubMed ID: 17179371
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Point/Counterpoint. Film mammography for breast cancer screening in younger women is no longer appropriate because of the demonstrated superiority of digital mammography for this age group.
    Yaffe MJ; Barnes GT; Orton CG
    Med Phys; 2006 Nov; 33(11):3979-82. PubMed ID: 17153375
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Blinded comparison of computer-aided detection with human second reading in screening mammography: the importance of the question and the critical numbers game.
    Brem RF
    AJR Am J Roentgenol; 2007 Nov; 189(5):1142-4. PubMed ID: 17954652
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Legal Ramifications of Computer-Aided Detection in Mammography.
    Mezrich JL; Siegel EL
    J Am Coll Radiol; 2015 Jun; 12(6):572-4. PubMed ID: 25547380
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Early detection of breast cancer: overview of the evidence on computer-aided detection in mammography screening.
    Houssami N; Given-Wilson R; Ciatto S
    J Med Imaging Radiat Oncol; 2009 Apr; 53(2):171-6. PubMed ID: 19527363
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Computer-aided detection in mammography.
    Astley SM; Gilbert FJ
    Clin Radiol; 2004 May; 59(5):390-9. PubMed ID: 15081844
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Effect of computer-aided detection on independent double reading of paired screen-film and full-field digital screening mammograms.
    Skaane P; Kshirsagar A; Stapleton S; Young K; Castellino RA
    AJR Am J Roentgenol; 2007 Feb; 188(2):377-84. PubMed ID: 17242245
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Estimating the effect of computer-aided detection on the sensitivity of screening mammography.
    Sacks WM
    Radiology; 2003 Feb; 226(2):597-8; author reply 598-9. PubMed ID: 12563163
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. A new era in mammography screening.
    Kopans DB
    Radiology; 2014 Jun; 271(3):629-31. PubMed ID: 24848957
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Diagnostic Accuracy of Digital Screening Mammography With and Without Computer-Aided Detection.
    Lehman CD; Wellman RD; Buist DS; Kerlikowske K; Tosteson AN; Miglioretti DL;
    JAMA Intern Med; 2015 Nov; 175(11):1828-37. PubMed ID: 26414882
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Computer aided mammography gets ahead of the evidence.
    BMJ; 2013 Apr; 346():f2387. PubMed ID: 23596219
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. The preponderance of evidence supports computer-aided detection for screening mammography.
    Birdwell RL
    Radiology; 2009 Oct; 253(1):9-16. PubMed ID: 19789250
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. CADe for early detection of breast cancer-current status and why we need to continue to explore new approaches.
    Nishikawa RM; Gur D
    Acad Radiol; 2014 Oct; 21(10):1320-1. PubMed ID: 25086951
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Comments on "Computer-aided detection in full-field digital mammography in a clinical population: performance of radiologist and technologists".
    Freedman MT
    Breast Cancer Res Treat; 2010 Apr; 120(2):507-8. PubMed ID: 19551501
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Digital mammography: an update.
    Schulz-Wendtland R; Fuchsjäger M; Wacker T; Hermann KP
    Eur J Radiol; 2009 Nov; 72(2):258-65. PubMed ID: 19592186
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Improvement in sensitivity of screening mammography with computer-aided detection: a multiinstitutional trial.
    Brem RF; Baum J; Lechner M; Kaplan S; Souders S; Naul LG; Hoffmeister J
    AJR Am J Roentgenol; 2003 Sep; 181(3):687-93. PubMed ID: 12933460
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Use of computer-aided detection (CAD) tools in screening mammography: a multidisciplinary investigation.
    Alberdi E; Povyakalo AA; Strigini L; Ayton P; Hartswood M; Procter R; Slack R
    Br J Radiol; 2005; 78 Spec No 1():S31-40. PubMed ID: 15917444
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. STORM, a new dimension for mammography screening.
    Houssami N
    Med J Aust; 2013 Sep; 199(5):308-9. PubMed ID: 23992172
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 7.