These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

330 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 16696484)

  • 1. The US radiation dosimetry standards for 60Co therapy level beams, and the transfer to the AAPM accredited dosimetry calibration laboratories.
    Minniti R; Chen-Mayer H; Seltzer SM; Huq MS; Bryson L; Slowey T; Micka JA; DeWerd LA; Wells N; Hanson WF; Ibbott GS;
    Med Phys; 2006 Apr; 33(4):1074-7. PubMed ID: 16696484
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Microionization chamber air-kerma calibration coefficients as a function of photon energy for x-ray spectra in the range of 20-250 kVp relative to 60Co.
    Snow JR; Micka JA; DeWerd LA
    Med Phys; 2013 Apr; 40(4):041711. PubMed ID: 23556881
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. The calibration and use of plane-parallel ionization chambers for dosimetry of electron beams: an extension of the 1983 AAPM protocol report of AAPM Radiation Therapy Committee Task Group No. 39.
    Almond PR; Attix FH; Humphries LJ; Kubo H; Nath R; Goetsch S; Rogers DW
    Med Phys; 1994 Aug; 21(8):1251-60. PubMed ID: 7799867
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. A dosimetry study comparing NCS report-5, IAEA TRS-381, AAPM TG-51 and IAEA TRS-398 in three clinical electron beam energies.
    Palmans H; Nafaa L; de Patoul N; Denis JM; Tomsej M; Vynckier S
    Phys Med Biol; 2003 May; 48(9):1091-107. PubMed ID: 12765324
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. A comparison of Australian and Canadian calibration coefficients for air kerma and absorbed dose to water for 60Co gamma radiation.
    Shortt KR; Huntley RB; Kotler LH; Boas JF; Webb DV
    Australas Phys Eng Sci Med; 2006 Jun; 29(2):206-15. PubMed ID: 16845927
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Simulation evaluation of NIST air-kerma rate calibration standard for electronic brachytherapy.
    Hiatt JR; Rivard MJ; Hughes HG
    Med Phys; 2016 Mar; 43(3):1119-29. PubMed ID: 26936699
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Reference dose determination in 60Co and high-energy radiotherapy photon beams by using Farmer-type cylindrical ionization chambers - an experimental investigation.
    Swanpalmer J
    Biomed Phys Eng Express; 2020 May; 6(4):045003. PubMed ID: 33444264
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Uncertainty of calibrations at the accredited dosimetry calibration laboratories.
    Ibbott GS; Attix FH; Slowey TW; Fontenla DP; Rozenfeld M
    Med Phys; 1997 Aug; 24(8):1249-54. PubMed ID: 9284248
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Clinical reference dosimetry: comparison between AAPM TG-21 and TG-51 protocols.
    Ding GX; Cygler JE; Kwok CB
    Med Phys; 2000 Jun; 27(6):1217-25. PubMed ID: 10902550
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Procedures for establishing and maintaining consistent air-kerma strength standards for low-energy, photon-emitting brachytherapy sources: recommendations of the Calibration Laboratory Accreditation Subcommittee of the American Association of Physicists in Medicine.
    DeWerd LA; Huq MS; Das IJ; Ibbott GS; Hanson WF; Slowey TW; Williamson JF; Coursey BM;
    Med Phys; 2004 Mar; 31(3):675-81. PubMed ID: 15070265
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Shift in absorbed dose for megavoltage photons when changing to TRS-398 in Australia.
    Butler DJ; Palmans H; Webb DV; ;
    Australas Phys Eng Sci Med; 2005 Sep; 28(3):159-64. PubMed ID: 16250469
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Absorbed dose to water based dosimetry versus air kerma based dosimetry for high-energy photon beams: an experimental study.
    Palmans H; Nafaa L; De JJ; Gillis S; Hoornaert MT; Martens C; Piessens M; Thierens H; Van der Plaetsen A; Vynckier S
    Phys Med Biol; 2002 Feb; 47(3):421-40. PubMed ID: 11848121
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Comparison of dosimetry calibration factors at the NRCC and the NIST. National Research Council of Canada. National Institute of Standards and Technology.
    Shortt K; Shobe J; Domen S
    Med Phys; 2000 Jul; 27(7):1644-54. PubMed ID: 10947268
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Comparison of high-energy photon and electron dosimetry for various dosimetry protocols.
    Araki F; Kubo HD
    Med Phys; 2002 May; 29(5):857-68. PubMed ID: 12033582
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Calibration of plane parallel ionization chambers: a new service for secondary standard dosimetry laboratories?
    Arib M; Chekerker H; Benmokhtar S; Meghzifene A
    Med Dosim; 2001; 26(4):301-4. PubMed ID: 11747994
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Calculated absorbed-dose ratios, TG51/TG21, for most widely used cylindrical and parallel-plate ion chambers over a range of photon and electron energies.
    Tailor RC; Hanson WF
    Med Phys; 2002 Jul; 29(7):1464-72. PubMed ID: 12148727
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Proton dosimetry intercomparison based on the ICRU report 59 protocol.
    Vatnitsky S; Moyers M; Miller D; Abell G; Slater JM; Pedroni E; Coray A; Mazal A; Newhauser W; Jaekel O; Heese J; Fukumura A; Futami Y; Verhey L; Daftari I; Grusell E; Molokanov A; Bloch C
    Radiother Oncol; 1999 Jun; 51(3):273-9. PubMed ID: 10435822
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Comparison of two methods of therapy level calibration at 60Co gamma beams.
    Bjerke H; Järvinen H; Grimbergen TW; Grindborg JE; Chauvenet B; Czap L; Ennow K; Moretti C; Rocha P
    Phys Med Biol; 1998 Oct; 43(10):2729-40. PubMed ID: 9814513
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Proton dosimetry intercomparison.
    Vatnitsky S; Siebers J; Miller D; Moyers M; Schaefer M; Jones D; Vynckier S; Hayakawa Y; Delacroix S; Isacsson U; Medin J; Kacperek A; Lomax A; Coray A; Kluge H; Heese J; Verhey L; Daftari I; Gall K; Lam G; Beck T; Hartmann G
    Radiother Oncol; 1996 Nov; 41(2):169-77. PubMed ID: 9004361
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. The IPEM code of practice for electron dosimetry for radiotherapy beams of initial energy from 4 to 25 MeV based on an absorbed dose to water calibration.
    Thwaites DI; DuSautoy AR; Jordan T; McEwen MR; Nisbet A; Nahum AE; Pitchford WG;
    Phys Med Biol; 2003 Sep; 48(18):2929-70. PubMed ID: 14529204
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 17.