240 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 16696488)
1. Effect of scatter and an antiscatter grid on the performance of a slot-scanning digital mammography system.
Shen SZ; Bloomquist AK; Mawdsley GE; Yaffe MJ; Elbakri I
Med Phys; 2006 Apr; 33(4):1108-15. PubMed ID: 16696488
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. The effect of scatter and glare on image quality in contrast-enhanced breast imaging using an a-Si/CsI(TI) full-field flat panel detector.
Carton AK; Acciavatti R; Kuo J; Maidment AD
Med Phys; 2009 Mar; 36(3):920-8. PubMed ID: 19378752
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Scatter rejection in multislit digital mammography.
Aslund M; Cederström B; Lundqvist M; Danielsson M
Med Phys; 2006 Apr; 33(4):933-40. PubMed ID: 16696469
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Effects on image quality of a 2D antiscatter grid in x-ray digital breast tomosynthesis: Initial experience using the dual modality (x-ray and molecular) breast tomosynthesis scanner.
Patel T; Peppard H; Williams MB
Med Phys; 2016 Apr; 43(4):1720. PubMed ID: 27036570
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Experimental evaluation of fiber-interspaced antiscatter grids for large patient imaging with digital x-ray systems.
Fetterly KA; Schueler BA
Phys Med Biol; 2007 Aug; 52(16):4863-80. PubMed ID: 17671340
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Comparison of scatter rejection and low-contrast performance of scan equalization digital radiography (SEDR), slot-scan digital radiography, and full-field digital radiography systems for chest phantom imaging.
Liu X; Shaw CC; Lai CJ; Wang T
Med Phys; 2011 Jan; 38(1):23-33. PubMed ID: 21361171
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Influence of scatter reduction method and monochromatic beams on image quality and dose in mammography.
Moeckli R; Verdun FR; Fiedler S; Pachoud M; Bulling S; Schnyder P; Valley JF
Med Phys; 2003 Dec; 30(12):3156-64. PubMed ID: 14713082
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Characterization of scatter in digital mammography from physical measurements.
Leon SM; Brateman LF; Wagner LK
Med Phys; 2014 Jun; 41(6):061901. PubMed ID: 24877812
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Effective detective quantum efficiency for two mammography systems: measurement and comparison against established metrics.
Salvagnini E; Bosmans H; Struelens L; Marshall NW
Med Phys; 2013 Oct; 40(10):101916. PubMed ID: 24089918
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Improved image quality in digital mammography with image processing.
Baydush AH; Floyd CE
Med Phys; 2000 Jul; 27(7):1503-8. PubMed ID: 10947253
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. [Dose reduction through gridless technique in digital full-field mammography].
Diekmann F; Diekmann S; Berzeg S; Bick U; Fischer T; Hamm B
Rofo; 2003 Jun; 175(6):769-74. PubMed ID: 12811688
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. The effect of the antiscatter grid on full-field digital mammography phantom images.
Chakraborty DP
J Digit Imaging; 1999 Feb; 12(1):12-22. PubMed ID: 10036663
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Grid removal and impact on population dose in full-field digital mammography.
Gennaro G; Katz L; Souchay H; Klausz R; Alberelli C; di Maggio C
Med Phys; 2007 Feb; 34(2):547-55. PubMed ID: 17388172
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Improved image quality of cone beam CT scans for radiotherapy image guidance using fiber-interspaced antiscatter grid.
Stankovic U; van Herk M; Ploeger LS; Sonke JJ
Med Phys; 2014 Jun; 41(6):061910. PubMed ID: 24877821
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Rejection and redistribution of scattered radiation in scan equalization digital radiography (SEDR): simulation with spot images.
Liu X; Shaw CC
Med Phys; 2007 Jul; 34(7):2718-29. PubMed ID: 17821980
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. X-ray spectrum optimization of full-field digital mammography: simulation and phantom study.
Bernhardt P; Mertelmeier T; Hoheisel M
Med Phys; 2006 Nov; 33(11):4337-49. PubMed ID: 17153413
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Quantification of scattered radiation in projection mammography: four practical methods compared.
Salvagnini E; Bosmans H; Struelens L; Marshall NW
Med Phys; 2012 Jun; 39(6):3167-80. PubMed ID: 22755701
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Lag and ghosting in a clinical flat-panel selenium digital mammography system.
Bloomquist AK; Yaffe MJ; Mawdsley GE; Hunter DM; Beideck DJ
Med Phys; 2006 Aug; 33(8):2998-3005. PubMed ID: 16964878
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Transmission characteristics of a two dimensional antiscatter grid prototype for CBCT.
Altunbas C; Kavanagh B; Alexeev T; Miften M
Med Phys; 2017 Aug; 44(8):3952-3964. PubMed ID: 28513847
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Efficiency of antiscatter grids for flat-detector CT.
Kyriakou Y; Kalender W
Phys Med Biol; 2007 Oct; 52(20):6275-93. PubMed ID: 17921585
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
