These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

419 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 16697344)

  • 1. Assessing the effectiveness of "intuitive" vibrotactile warning signals in preventing front-to-rear-end collisions in a driving simulator.
    Ho C; Reed N; Spence C
    Accid Anal Prev; 2006 Sep; 38(5):988-96. PubMed ID: 16697344
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Dynamic vibrotactile signals for forward collision avoidance warning systems.
    Meng F; Gray R; Ho C; Ahtamad M; Spence C
    Hum Factors; 2015 Mar; 57(2):329-46. PubMed ID: 25850161
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Multisensory in-car warning signals for collision avoidance.
    Ho C; Reed N; Spence C
    Hum Factors; 2007 Dec; 49(6):1107-14. PubMed ID: 18074709
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Expectations while car following--the consequences for driving behaviour in a simulated driving task.
    Muhrer E; Vollrath M
    Accid Anal Prev; 2010 Nov; 42(6):2158-64. PubMed ID: 20728676
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Responses to deceleration during car following: roles of optic flow, warnings, expectations, and interruptions.
    DeLucia PR; Tharanathan A
    J Exp Psychol Appl; 2009 Dec; 15(4):334-50. PubMed ID: 20025419
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Evaluation of a sudden brake warning system: effect on the response time of the following driver.
    Isler RB; Starkey NJ
    Appl Ergon; 2010 Jul; 41(4):569-76. PubMed ID: 20034608
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. An electrophysiological study of the impact of a Forward Collision Warning System in a simulator driving task.
    Bueno M; Fabrigoule C; Deleurence P; Ndiaye D; Fort A
    Brain Res; 2012 Aug; 1470():69-79. PubMed ID: 22765914
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Collision warning timing, driver distraction, and driver response to imminent rear-end collisions in a high-fidelity driving simulator.
    Lee JD; McGehee DV; Brown TL; Reyes ML
    Hum Factors; 2002; 44(2):314-34. PubMed ID: 12452276
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Capturing attention to brake lamps.
    McIntyre SE
    Accid Anal Prev; 2008 Mar; 40(2):691-6. PubMed ID: 18329422
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Light truck vehicles (LTVs) contribution to rear-end collisions.
    Harb R; Radwan E; Yan X; Abdel-Aty M
    Accid Anal Prev; 2007 Sep; 39(5):1026-36. PubMed ID: 17359926
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. A comparison of tactile, visual, and auditory warnings for rear-end collision prevention in simulated driving.
    Scott JJ; Gray R
    Hum Factors; 2008 Apr; 50(2):264-75. PubMed ID: 18516837
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. A rear-end collision risk assessment model based on drivers' collision avoidance process under influences of cell phone use and gender-A driving simulator based study.
    Li X; Yan X; Wu J; Radwan E; Zhang Y
    Accid Anal Prev; 2016 Dec; 97():1-18. PubMed ID: 27565040
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. The role of looming and attention capture in drivers' braking responses.
    Terry HR; Charlton SG; Perrone JA
    Accid Anal Prev; 2008 Jul; 40(4):1375-82. PubMed ID: 18606269
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Alarm mistrust in automobiles: how collision alarm reliability affects driving.
    Bliss JP; Acton SA
    Appl Ergon; 2003 Nov; 34(6):499-509. PubMed ID: 14559409
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Back to the future: brake reaction times for manual and automated vehicles.
    Young MS; Stanton NA
    Ergonomics; 2007 Jan; 50(1):46-58. PubMed ID: 17178651
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Dynamic vibrotactile warning signals for frontal collision avoidance: towards the torso versus towards the head.
    Meng F; Ho C; Gray R; Spence C
    Ergonomics; 2015; 58(3):411-25. PubMed ID: 25374255
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. The contribution of stereo vision to the control of braking.
    Tijtgat P; Mazyn L; De Laey C; Lenoir M
    Accid Anal Prev; 2008 Mar; 40(2):719-24. PubMed ID: 18329426
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. The differential effect of vibrotactile and auditory cues on visual spatial attention.
    Ho C; Tan HZ; Spence C
    Ergonomics; 2006 Jun; 49(7):724-38. PubMed ID: 16720531
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Investigation into the effect of an intersection crash warning system on driving performance in a simulator.
    Chen H; Cao L; Logan DB
    Traffic Inj Prev; 2011 Oct; 12(5):529-37. PubMed ID: 21972864
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Comparing spatially static and dynamic vibrotactile take-over requests in the driver seat.
    Petermeijer SM; Cieler S; de Winter JCF
    Accid Anal Prev; 2017 Feb; 99(Pt A):218-227. PubMed ID: 27978486
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 21.