These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

419 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 16697344)

  • 21. Car following decisions under three visibility conditions and two speeds tested with a driving simulator.
    Broughton KL; Switzer F; Scott D
    Accid Anal Prev; 2007 Jan; 39(1):106-16. PubMed ID: 16962059
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 22. Choice of time-headway in car-following and the role of time-to-collision information in braking.
    Van Winsum W; Heino A
    Ergonomics; 1996 Apr; 39(4):579-92. PubMed ID: 8854979
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 23. Take-over again: Investigating multimodal and directional TORs to get the driver back into the loop.
    Petermeijer S; Bazilinskyy P; Bengler K; de Winter J
    Appl Ergon; 2017 Jul; 62():204-215. PubMed ID: 28411731
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 24. Driving with a partially autonomous forward collision warning system: how do drivers react?
    Muhrer E; Reinprecht K; Vollrath M
    Hum Factors; 2012 Oct; 54(5):698-708. PubMed ID: 23156616
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 25. Behavioural accident avoidance science: understanding response in collision incipient conditions.
    Hancock PA; de Ridder SN
    Ergonomics; 2003 Oct; 46(12):1111-35. PubMed ID: 12933076
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 26. Assessing the effectiveness of various auditory cues in capturing a driver's visual attention.
    Ho C; Spence C
    J Exp Psychol Appl; 2005 Sep; 11(3):157-74. PubMed ID: 16221035
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 27. Practice makes better - Learning effects of driving with a multi-stage collision warning.
    Winkler S; Kazazi J; Vollrath M
    Accid Anal Prev; 2018 Aug; 117():398-409. PubMed ID: 29477461
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 28. The role of attention in horizontal curves: a comparison of advance warning, delineation, and road marking treatments.
    Charlton SG
    Accid Anal Prev; 2007 Sep; 39(5):873-85. PubMed ID: 17217906
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 29. Traffic calming along rural highways crossing small urban communities: driving simulator experiment.
    Galante F; Mauriello F; Montella A; Pernetti M; Aria M; D'Ambrosio A
    Accid Anal Prev; 2010 Nov; 42(6):1585-94. PubMed ID: 20728607
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 30. A driving simulator study of driver performance on deceleration lanes.
    Calvi A; Benedetto A; De Blasiis MR
    Accid Anal Prev; 2012 Mar; 45():195-203. PubMed ID: 22269501
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 31. Age and gender differences in time to collision at braking from the 100-Car Naturalistic Driving Study.
    Montgomery J; Kusano KD; Gabler HC
    Traffic Inj Prev; 2014; 15 Suppl 1():S15-20. PubMed ID: 25307380
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 32. That's close enough--a threshold effect of time headway on the experience of risk, task difficulty, effort, and comfort.
    Lewis-Evans B; De Waard D; Brookhuis KA
    Accid Anal Prev; 2010 Nov; 42(6):1926-33. PubMed ID: 20728644
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 33. Driver behaviour at rail level crossings: responses to flashing lights, traffic signals and stop signs in simulated rural driving.
    Lenné MG; Rudin-Brown CM; Navarro J; Edquist J; Trotter M; Tomasevic N
    Appl Ergon; 2011 May; 42(4):548-54. PubMed ID: 20926063
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 34. The influence of distraction and driving context on driver response to imperfect collision warning systems.
    Lees MN; Lee JD
    Ergonomics; 2007 Aug; 50(8):1264-86. PubMed ID: 17558669
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 35. Heavy-truck drivers' following behavior with intervention of an integrated, in-vehicle crash warning system: a field evaluation.
    Bao S; LeBlanc DJ; Sayer JR; Flannagan C
    Hum Factors; 2012 Oct; 54(5):687-97. PubMed ID: 23156615
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 36. Driving errors that predict simulated rear-end collisions in drivers with multiple sclerosis.
    Krasniuk S; Classen S; Morrow SA
    Traffic Inj Prev; 2021; 22(3):212-217. PubMed ID: 33688770
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 37. Comparison between younger and older drivers of the effect of obstacle direction on the minimum obstacle distance to brake and avoid a motor vehicle accident.
    Martin PL; Audet T; Corriveau H; Hamel M; D'Amours M; Smeesters C
    Accid Anal Prev; 2010 Jul; 42(4):1144-50. PubMed ID: 20441824
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 38. Effects of in-vehicle warning information displays with or without spatial compatibility on driving behaviors and response performance.
    Liu YC; Jhuang JW
    Appl Ergon; 2012 Jul; 43(4):679-86. PubMed ID: 22103964
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 39. The effects of driver identity on driving safety in a retrospective feedback system.
    Zhao G; Wu C
    Accid Anal Prev; 2012 Mar; 45():354-65. PubMed ID: 22269519
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 40. Driving performance assessment: effects of traffic accident location and alarm content.
    Chang SH; Lin CY; Fung CP; Hwang JR; Doong JL
    Accid Anal Prev; 2008 Sep; 40(5):1637-43. PubMed ID: 18760090
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 21.