BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

123 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 16697721)

  • 1. Surface visualization at 3D endoluminal CT colonography: degree of coverage and implications for polyp detection.
    Pickhardt PJ; Taylor AJ; Gopal DV
    Gastroenterology; 2006 May; 130(6):1582-7. PubMed ID: 16697721
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Polyp detection at 3-dimensional endoluminal computed tomography colonography: sensitivity of one-way fly-through at 120 degrees field-of-view angle.
    Pickhardt PJ; Schumacher C; Kim DH
    J Comput Assist Tomogr; 2009; 33(4):631-5. PubMed ID: 19638863
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Surface visualization at CT colonography simulated colonoscopy: effect of varying field of view and retrograde view.
    East JE; Saunders BP; Burling D; Boone D; Halligan S; Taylor SA
    Am J Gastroenterol; 2007 Nov; 102(11):2529-35. PubMed ID: 17640320
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Three-dimensional endoluminal CT colonography (virtual colonoscopy): comparison of three commercially available systems.
    Pickhardt PJ
    AJR Am J Roentgenol; 2003 Dec; 181(6):1599-606. PubMed ID: 14627581
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Primary three-dimensional analysis with perspective-filet view versus primary two-dimensional analysis: evaluation of lesion detection by inexperienced readers at computed tomographic colonography in symptomatic patients.
    Fisichella VA; Jäderling F; Horvath S; Stotzer PO; Kilander A; Hellström M
    Acta Radiol; 2009 Apr; 50(3):244-55. PubMed ID: 19235581
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Primary 2D versus primary 3D polyp detection at screening CT colonography.
    Pickhardt PJ; Lee AD; Taylor AJ; Michel SJ; Winter TC; Shadid A; Meiners RJ; Chase PJ; Hinshaw JL; Williams JG; Prout TM; Husain SH; Kim DH
    AJR Am J Roentgenol; 2007 Dec; 189(6):1451-6. PubMed ID: 18029884
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. False-negative results at multi-detector row CT colonography: multivariate analysis of causes for missed lesions.
    Park SH; Ha HK; Kim MJ; Kim KW; Kim AY; Yang DH; Lee MG; Kim PN; Shin YM; Yang SK; Myung SJ; Min YI
    Radiology; 2005 May; 235(2):495-502. PubMed ID: 15770042
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Polyp detection with CT colonography: primary 3D endoluminal analysis versus primary 2D transverse analysis with computer-assisted reader software.
    Taylor SA; Halligan S; Slater A; Goh V; Burling DN; Roddie ME; Honeyfield L; McQuillan J; Amin H; Dehmeshki J
    Radiology; 2006 Jun; 239(3):759-67. PubMed ID: 16543593
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Comparison of a unidirectional panoramic 3D endoluminal interpretation technique to traditional 2D and bidirectional 3D interpretation techniques at CT colonography: preliminary observations.
    Lenhart DK; Babb J; Bonavita J; Kim D; Bini EJ; Megibow AJ; Macari M
    Clin Radiol; 2010 Feb; 65(2):118-25. PubMed ID: 20103433
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. A feasibility study of unidirectional 240°-angle 3D CT colonography.
    Oh SN; Lee YJ; Kim YS; Jung SE; Rha SE; Shin YR; Byun JY; Choi BG
    Clin Imaging; 2012; 36(5):553-8. PubMed ID: 22920361
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Diagnostic performance of primary 3-dimensional computed tomography colonography in the setting of colonic diverticular disease.
    Sanford MF; Pickhardt PJ
    Clin Gastroenterol Hepatol; 2006 Aug; 4(8):1039-47. PubMed ID: 16793347
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Linear polyp measurement at CT colonography: in vitro and in vivo comparison of two-dimensional and three-dimensional displays.
    Pickhardt PJ; Lee AD; McFarland EG; Taylor AJ
    Radiology; 2005 Sep; 236(3):872-8. PubMed ID: 16118167
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Polyp measurement reliability, accuracy, and discrepancy: optical colonoscopy versus CT colonography with pig colonic specimens.
    Park SH; Choi EK; Lee SS; Byeon JS; Jo JY; Kim YH; Lee KH; Ha HK; Han JK
    Radiology; 2007 Jul; 244(1):157-64. PubMed ID: 17507724
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Manual and automated polyp measurement comparison of CT colonography with optical colonoscopy.
    Jeong JY; Kim MJ; Kim SS
    Acad Radiol; 2008 Feb; 15(2):231-9. PubMed ID: 18206622
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. [CT colonography: evaluation of two 3D algorithms in a screening population].
    Juchems MS; Ernst AS; Sheafor DH; Carrascosa P; Virmany S; Brambs HJ; Aschoff AJ
    Rofo; 2009 Jun; 181(6):573-8. PubMed ID: 19440949
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Uni- and bidirectional wide angle CT colonography: effect on missed areas, surface visualization, viewing time and polyp conspicuity.
    East JE; Saunders BP; Boone D; Burling D; Halligan S; Taylor SA
    Eur Radiol; 2008 Sep; 18(9):1910-7. PubMed ID: 18414869
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Diagnostic accuracy of laxative-free computed tomographic colonography for detection of adenomatous polyps in asymptomatic adults: a prospective evaluation.
    Zalis ME; Blake MA; Cai W; Hahn PF; Halpern EF; Kazam IG; Keroack M; Magee C; Näppi JJ; Perez-Johnston R; Saltzman JR; Vij A; Yee J; Yoshida H
    Ann Intern Med; 2012 May; 156(10):692-702. PubMed ID: 22586008
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Assessment of two 3D MDCT colonography protocols for observation of colorectal polyps.
    Yasumoto T; Murakami T; Yamamoto H; Hori M; Iannaccone R; Kim T; Abe H; Kuwabara M; Yamasaki K; Kikkawa N; Arimoto H; Passariello R; Nakamura H
    AJR Am J Roentgenol; 2006 Jan; 186(1):85-9. PubMed ID: 16357383
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. [CT-colonography with the 16-slice CT for the diagnostic evaluation of colorectal neoplasms and inflammatory colon diseases].
    Röttgen R; Schröder RJ; Lorenz M; Herbel A; Fischbach F; Herzog H; Lopez-Häninnen E; Gutberlet M; Hoffmann K; Helmig K; Felix R
    Rofo; 2003 Oct; 175(10):1384-91. PubMed ID: 14556108
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. The effect of diagnostic confidence on the probability of optical colonoscopic confirmation of potential polyps detected on CT colonography: prospective assessment in 1,339 asymptomatic adults.
    Pickhardt PJ; Choi JR; Nugent PA; Schindler WR
    AJR Am J Roentgenol; 2004 Dec; 183(6):1661-5. PubMed ID: 15547207
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 7.