These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
3. [MR-Imaging of lower leg muscle perfusion]. Leppek R; Hoos O; Sattler A; Kohle S; Azzam S; Al Haffar I; Keil B; Ricken P; Klose KJ; Alfke H Herz; 2004 Feb; 29(1):32-46. PubMed ID: 14968340 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Use of dynamic contrast-enhanced MRI to assess the functional vascular pharmacokinetic parameters of normal human ovaries. Hall GH; Atkin SL; Turnbull LW J Reprod Med; 2002 Feb; 47(2):107-14. PubMed ID: 11883348 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Reproducibility of the aortic input function (AIF) derived from dynamic contrast-enhanced magnetic resonance imaging (DCE-MRI) of the kidneys in a volunteer study. Mendichovszky IA; Cutajar M; Gordon I Eur J Radiol; 2009 Sep; 71(3):576-81. PubMed ID: 19004588 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Dynamic contrast enhanced MRI in the differential diagnosis of adrenal adenomas and malignant adrenal masses. Inan N; Arslan A; Akansel G; Anik Y; Balci NC; Demirci A Eur J Radiol; 2008 Jan; 65(1):154-62. PubMed ID: 17466481 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Dynamic contrast-enhanced MR imaging of the water fraction of normal bone marrow and diffuse bone marrow disease. Katsuya T; Inoue T; Ishizaka H; Aoki J; Endo K Radiat Med; 2000; 18(5):291-7. PubMed ID: 11128399 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Value of dynamic enhanced magnetic resonance imaging for distinguishing between ovarian fibroma and subserous uterine leiomyoma. Thomassin-Naggara I; Daraï E; Nassar-Slaba J; Cortez A; Marsault C; Bazot M J Comput Assist Tomogr; 2007; 31(2):236-42. PubMed ID: 17414760 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Dynamic contrast-enhanced magnetic resonance imaging of abdominal solid organ and major vessel: comparison of enhancement effect between Gd-EOB-DTPA and Gd-DTPA. Tamada T; Ito K; Sone T; Yamamoto A; Yoshida K; Kakuba K; Tanimoto D; Higashi H; Yamashita T J Magn Reson Imaging; 2009 Mar; 29(3):636-40. PubMed ID: 19243060 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. 3D dynamic contrast-enhanced MRI of rectal carcinoma at 3T: correlation with microvascular density and vascular endothelial growth factor markers of tumor angiogenesis. Zhang XM; Yu D; Zhang HL; Dai Y; Bi D; Liu Z; Prince MR; Li C J Magn Reson Imaging; 2008 Jun; 27(6):1309-16. PubMed ID: 18504761 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. [MR-imaging of the breast at 0.5 Tesla: menstrual-cycle dependency of parenchymal contrast enhancement in healthy volunteers with oral contraceptive use?]. Lorenzen J; Welger J; Lisboa BW; Krupski G; Adam G Rofo; 2003 Apr; 175(4):502-6. PubMed ID: 12677505 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. [Preliminary result of dynamic contrast-enhanced MR imaging in assessment of cellularity characteristics of bone marrow in patients with haematological malignancies]. Zhang L; Mandel C; Yang ZY; Wang PJ; Pitman AG Zhonghua Zhong Liu Za Zhi; 2007 Mar; 29(3):202-5. PubMed ID: 17649637 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. [Value of dynamic enhanced magnetic resonance in diagnosis of pancreatic carcinoma and endocrine tumors]. Lu GM; Wang ZQ; Zheng L; Wang JP; Qiu XM; Tang XJ Zhonghua Yi Xue Za Zhi; 2006 Apr; 86(14):951-4. PubMed ID: 16759532 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Tracer kinetics analysis of dynamic contrast-enhanced CT and MR data in patients with squamous cell carcinoma of the upper aerodigestive tract: comparison of the results. Bisdas S; Baghi M; Wagenblast J; Bisdas T; Thng CH; Mack MG; Koh TS; Ernemann U Clin Physiol Funct Imaging; 2009 Sep; 29(5):339-46. PubMed ID: 19473200 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. In vivo biochemical 7.0 Tesla magnetic resonance: preliminary results of dGEMRIC, zonal T2, and T2* mapping of articular cartilage. Welsch GH; Mamisch TC; Hughes T; Zilkens C; Quirbach S; Scheffler K; Kraff O; Schweitzer ME; Szomolanyi P; Trattnig S Invest Radiol; 2008 Sep; 43(9):619-26. PubMed ID: 18708855 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Semiquantitative and quantitative dynamic contrast-enhanced magnetic resonance imaging measurements predict radiation response in cervix cancer. Zahra MA; Tan LT; Priest AN; Graves MJ; Arends M; Crawford RA; Brenton JD; Lomas DJ; Sala E Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys; 2009 Jul; 74(3):766-73. PubMed ID: 19019563 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Signal intensity of normal breast tissue at MR mammography on midfield: applying a random coefficient model evaluating the effect of doubling the contrast dose. Marklund M; Christensen R; Torp-Pedersen S; Thomsen C; Nolsøe CP Eur J Radiol; 2009 Jan; 69(1):93-101. PubMed ID: 17961948 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Evaluation of rectus extraocular muscles using dynamic contrast-enhanced MR imaging in patients with Graves' ophthalmopathy for assessment of disease activity. Jiang H; Wang Z; Xian J; Li J; Chen Q; Ai L Acta Radiol; 2012 Feb; 53(1):87-94. PubMed ID: 22184678 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Enhanced mass on contrast-enhanced breast MR imaging: Lesion characterization using combination of dynamic contrast-enhanced and diffusion-weighted MR images. Yabuuchi H; Matsuo Y; Okafuji T; Kamitani T; Soeda H; Setoguchi T; Sakai S; Hatakenaka M; Kubo M; Sadanaga N; Yamamoto H; Honda H J Magn Reson Imaging; 2008 Nov; 28(5):1157-65. PubMed ID: 18972357 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related] [Next] [New Search]