296 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 16698253)
1. [Family planning: visit without parents].
Prudhomme M
Arch Pediatr; 2006 Jun; 13(6):745-8. PubMed ID: 16698253
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
2. Young people and sexual health: whose rights? Whose responsibilities? R. (on the application of Axon) v. Secretary of State for Health & another.
Bridgeman J
Med Law Rev; 2006; 14(3):418-24. PubMed ID: 16963473
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
3. Confidential reproductive health services for minors: the potential impact of mandated parental involvement for contraception.
Jones RK; Boonstra H
Perspect Sex Reprod Health; 2004; 36(5):182-91. PubMed ID: 15519960
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. In strictest confidence.
French K
Nurs Manag (Harrow); 2005 Dec; 12(8):26-9. PubMed ID: 16381226
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
5. [6/6 consultation of a minor].
Soins Psychiatr; 2009; (265):45-6. PubMed ID: 19927868
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
6. Mother, may I?: ramifications for parental involvement laws for minors seeking abortion services.
Blasdell J
Am Univ J Gend Soc Policy Law; 2002; 10(2):287-304. PubMed ID: 16526133
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
7. [Role of parents for adolescent's outpatient clinic].
Cosseron F; Baqué O; Girardon N
Arch Pediatr; 2006 Jun; 13(6):748-50. PubMed ID: 16697165
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
8. Grounded in the reality of their lives: listening to teens who make the abortion decision without involving their parents.
Ehrlich JS
Berkeley Womens Law J; 2003; 18():61-180. PubMed ID: 15156878
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
9. Misconceived laws: the irrationality of parental involvement requirements for contraception.
Arons JR
William Mary Law Rev; 2000 Mar; 41(3):1093-131. PubMed ID: 16329212
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
10. The inapplicability of parental involvement laws to the distribution of mifepristone (RU-486) to minors.
Scuder AC
Am Univ J Gend Soc Policy Law; 2002; 10(3):711-41. PubMed ID: 16594112
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
11. The case of the pregnant adolescent.
Peltier BN; Hoover T; Zarkowski P; Patterson T
J Am Coll Dent; 2011; 78(4):48-55. PubMed ID: 22416619
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. The worst of both worlds?: parental involvement requirements and the privacy rights of mature minors.
O'Shaughnessy M
Ohio State Law J; 1996; 57(5):1731-65. PubMed ID: 16086519
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
13. Your parents or the judge: Massachusetts' new abortion consent law.
Donovan P
Fam Plann Perspect; 1981; 13(5):224-8. PubMed ID: 7286173
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
14. Bad girls or big brother?
Fallon D
Paediatr Nurs; 2006 Feb; 18(1):3. PubMed ID: 16518944
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
15. Elective abortions for minors: impact of the new law in France.
Vendittelli F; Pons JC
Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol; 2007 Jan; 130(1):107-13. PubMed ID: 16423445
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Permission required.
Prather E
Tex Med; 2005 Aug; 101(8):37-9. PubMed ID: 17236316
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
17. Minor rights: the adolescent abortion cases.
Guggenheim M
Hofstra Law Rev; 2002; 30(3):589-646. PubMed ID: 15212070
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
18. Journey through the courts: minors, abortion and the quest for reproductive fairness.
Ehrlich JS
Yale J Law Fem; 1998; 10(1):1-27. PubMed ID: 16596765
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
19. Parental involvement laws and parent-daughter communication: policy without proof.
Webster RD; Neustadt AN; Whitaker AK; Gilliam ML
Contraception; 2010 Oct; 82(4):310-3. PubMed ID: 20851223
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
20. Splitting the baby: when can a pregnant minor obtain an abortion without parental consent? The Ex parte Anonymous cases (Alabama 2001).
Rosenberg SP
Conn Law Rev; 2002; 34(3):1109-41. PubMed ID: 15212029
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
