115 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 16698349)
1. Comparison of mechanical and in vivo performance of new and reprocessed harmonic scalpels.
Weld KJ; Dryer S; Hruby G; Ames CD; Venkatesh R; Matthews BD; Landman J
Urology; 2006 May; 67(5):898-903. PubMed ID: 16698349
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Comparison of in vivo clinical performance and shaft temperature and in vitro tissue temperature and transection times between new and reprocessed harmonic scalpels.
Lester BR; Miller K; Boers A; Harris DC; Gamble WG
Surg Laparosc Endosc Percutan Tech; 2010 Oct; 20(5):e150-9. PubMed ID: 20975490
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Prospective randomized single-blinded in vitro and ex vivo evaluation of new and reprocessed laparoscopic trocars.
Mues AC; Haramis G; Casazza C; Okhunov Z; Badani KK; Landman J
J Am Coll Surg; 2010 Dec; 211(6):738-43. PubMed ID: 21036630
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Assessment of reprocessed arthroscopic shaver blades.
King JS; Pink MM; Jobe CM
Arthroscopy; 2006 Oct; 22(10):1046-52. PubMed ID: 17027401
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Structural damage and chemical contaminants on reprocessed arthroscopic shaver blades.
Kobayashi M; Nakagawa Y; Okamoto Y; Nakamura S; Nakamura T
Am J Sports Med; 2009 Feb; 37(2):266-73. PubMed ID: 19118081
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Laparoscopic instruments. Patient care, cost issues.
Reichert M
AORN J; 1993 Mar; 57(3):637-51, 654-5. PubMed ID: 8439132
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
7. How can we safely use ultrasonic laparoscopic coagulating shears?
Kim JS; Hattori R; Yamamoto T; Yoshino Y; Gotoh M
Int J Urol; 2010 Apr; 17(4):377-81. PubMed ID: 20409232
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Can harmonic focus curved shear effectively seal the pancreatic ducts and prevent pancreatic leak? Feasibility evaluation and testing in ex vivo and in vivo porcine models.
Chamberlain RS; Korvick D; Mootoo M; Story S; Dubiel B; Sharpnack D
J Surg Res; 2009 Dec; 157(2):279-83. PubMed ID: 19765731
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Reprocessed arthroscopic shavers: evaluation of sharpness and function in a cadaver model.
Ledonio CG; Arendt EA; Adams JE; Matz J; Boers A; Miller K; Lester BR
Orthopedics; 2014 Jan; 37(1):e1-9. PubMed ID: 24683649
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Residual organic debris on processed surgical instruments.
DesCôteaux JG; Poulin EC; Julien M; Guidoin R
AORN J; 1995 Jul; 62(1):23-30. PubMed ID: 7574561
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Committee opinion no. 537: reprocessed single-use devices.
Committee on Gynecologic Practice, The American College of Obstetricians and Gynecologists
Obstet Gynecol; 2012 Oct; 120(4):974-6. PubMed ID: 22996127
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Acceptance criteria for reprocessed AcuNav catheters: comparison between functionality testing and clinical image assessment.
Bank AJ; Berry JM; Wilson RF; Lester BR
Ultrasound Med Biol; 2009 Mar; 35(3):507-14. PubMed ID: 19056163
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. An investigation into the impact of safety features on the ergonomics of surgical scalpels.
Wu X; Thomson G; Tang B
Appl Ergon; 2009 May; 40(3):424-32. PubMed ID: 19084819
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Ultracision in gynaecological laparoscopic surgery.
Kunde D; Welch C
J Obstet Gynaecol; 2003 Jul; 23(4):347-52. PubMed ID: 12881068
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Interim guidance for wraps for surgical instrument trays, pending publication of British standard specifications for disposable tray wraps.
J Sterile Serv Manage; 1988 Aug; 6(2):9. PubMed ID: 10290407
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
16. Endosurgery instruments: reusables vs disposables.
Patterson D
OR Manager; 1993 Jan; 9(1):1, 6-8. PubMed ID: 10123465
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
17. Assessing organic material on single-use vessel sealing devices: a comparative study of reprocessed and new LigaSure™ devices.
Chivukula SR; Lammers S; Wagner J
Surg Endosc; 2021 Aug; 35(8):4539-4549. PubMed ID: 32909208
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Comparison of torsional and linear mode ultrasonic coagulating shears for sealing veins.
Ching SS; Verbeke CS; Homer-Vanniasinkam S; McMahon MJ
J Laparoendosc Adv Surg Tech A; 2008 Dec; 18(6):819-24. PubMed ID: 19105669
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Comparison of performance characteristics between new and reprocessed electrophysiology catheters.
Lester BR; Alexander AA; Miller K; Boser NP; Sullivan BF; Brucker GG
J Interv Card Electrophysiol; 2006 Nov; 17(2):77-83. PubMed ID: 17226083
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Randomized controlled trial of harmonic scalpel use during thyroidectomy.
Miccoli P; Berti P; Dionigi G; D'Agostino J; Orlandini C; Donatini G
Arch Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg; 2006 Oct; 132(10):1069-73. PubMed ID: 17043253
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
