These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

165 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 16700294)

  • 1. Configural information in gender categorisation.
    Baudouin JY; Humphreys GW
    Perception; 2006; 35(4):531-40. PubMed ID: 16700294
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Gender-based prototype formation in face recognition.
    Baudouin JY; Brochard R
    J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn; 2011 Jul; 37(4):888-98. PubMed ID: 21480752
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Sex differences in face gender recognition in humans.
    Cellerino A; Borghetti D; Sartucci F
    Brain Res Bull; 2004 Jul; 63(6):443-9. PubMed ID: 15249109
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. The effect of rotation on configural encoding in a face-matching task.
    Edmonds AJ; Lewis MB
    Perception; 2007; 36(3):446-60. PubMed ID: 17455758
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Configural information in facial expression perception.
    Calder AJ; Young AW; Keane J; Dean M
    J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform; 2000 Apr; 26(2):527-51. PubMed ID: 10811161
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Demonstrating the acquired familiarity of faces by using a gender-decision task.
    Clutterbuck R; Johnston RA
    Perception; 2004; 33(2):159-68. PubMed ID: 15109159
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Categorical perception effects for facial identity in robustly represented familiar and self-faces: the role of configural and featural information.
    Keyes H
    Q J Exp Psychol (Hove); 2012; 65(4):760-72. PubMed ID: 22248095
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Symmetrical interaction of sex and expression in face classification tasks.
    Aguado L; García-Gutierrez A; Serrano-Pedraza I
    Atten Percept Psychophys; 2009 Jan; 71(1):9-25. PubMed ID: 19304593
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. The influence of feature conjunction on object inversion and conversion effects.
    Bushmakin MA; James TW
    Perception; 2014; 43(1):31-42. PubMed ID: 24689130
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Tolerance for distorted faces: challenges to a configural processing account of familiar face recognition.
    Sandford A; Burton AM
    Cognition; 2014 Sep; 132(3):262-8. PubMed ID: 24853629
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. When Arnold is "the terminator", we no longer see him as a man: the temporal determinants of person perception.
    Quinn KA; Mason MF; Macrae CN
    Exp Psychol; 2010; 57(1):27-35. PubMed ID: 20178961
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Emotion recognition: the role of featural and configural face information.
    Bombari D; Schmid PC; Schmid Mast M; Birri S; Mast FW; Lobmaier JS
    Q J Exp Psychol (Hove); 2013; 66(12):2426-42. PubMed ID: 23679155
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. The composite-face effect survives asymmetric face distortions.
    de Heering A; Wallis J; Maurer D
    Perception; 2012; 41(6):707-16. PubMed ID: 23094459
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. What makes faces special?
    Yue X; Tjan BS; Biederman I
    Vision Res; 2006 Oct; 46(22):3802-11. PubMed ID: 16938328
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Telling faces together: Learning new faces through exposure to multiple instances.
    Andrews S; Jenkins R; Cursiter H; Burton AM
    Q J Exp Psychol (Hove); 2015; 68(10):2041-50. PubMed ID: 25607814
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Component structure of individual differences in true and false recognition of faces.
    Bartlett JC; Shastri KK; Abdi H; Neville-Smith M
    J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn; 2009 Sep; 35(5):1207-30. PubMed ID: 19686016
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Sex differences in face gender recognition: an event-related potential study.
    Sun Y; Gao X; Han S
    Brain Res; 2010 Apr; 1327():69-76. PubMed ID: 20153301
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. The activation of visual memory for facial identity is task-dependent: evidence from human electrophysiology.
    Zimmermann FG; Eimer M
    Cortex; 2014 May; 54():124-34. PubMed ID: 24657481
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Mechanisms of identity and gender decisions to faces: who rocked in 1986?
    Richards RM; Ellis AW
    Perception; 2008; 37(11):1700-19. PubMed ID: 19189733
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Effects of geometric distortions on face-recognition performance.
    Hole GJ; George PA; Eaves K; Rasek A
    Perception; 2002; 31(10):1221-40. PubMed ID: 12430949
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 9.