BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

272 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 16700378)

  • 1. Value and pregnancy outcome of external cephalic version.
    Hindawi I
    East Mediterr Health J; 2005 Jul; 11(4):633-9. PubMed ID: 16700378
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. External cephalic version with salbutamol - success rate and predictors of success.
    Tasnim N; Mahmud G; Khurshid M
    J Coll Physicians Surg Pak; 2009 Feb; 19(2):91-4. PubMed ID: 19208311
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. [External cephalic version for breech presentation at term: an effective procedure to reduce the caesarean section rate].
    Lojacono A; Donarini G; Valcamonico A; Soregaroli M; Frusca T
    Minerva Ginecol; 2003 Dec; 55(6):519-24. PubMed ID: 14676741
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Value of routine ultrasound examination at 35-37 weeks' gestation in diagnosis of non-cephalic presentation.
    De Castro H; Ciobanu A; Formuso C; Akolekar R; Nicolaides KH
    Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol; 2020 Feb; 55(2):248-256. PubMed ID: 31671470
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. [Fewer breech deliveries after implementation of a modified cephalic version protocol].
    Kuppens SM; Francois AM; Hasaart TH; van der Donk MW; Pop VJ
    Ned Tijdschr Geneeskd; 2010; 154():A63. PubMed ID: 20132565
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Predictors of successful outcomes after external cephalic version in singleton term breech pregnancies: a nine-year historical cohort study.
    Cho LY; Lau WL; Lo TK; Tang HH; Leung WC
    Hong Kong Med J; 2012 Feb; 18(1):11-9. PubMed ID: 22302905
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Comparison of Fetomaternal Outcome between 47 Deliveries Following Successful External Cephalic Version for Breech Presentation and 7456 Deliveries Following Spontaneous Cephalic Presentation.
    de Gregorio N; Friedl T; Schramm A; Reister F; Janni W; Ebner F
    Gynecol Obstet Invest; 2018; 83(5):477-481. PubMed ID: 28848185
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. An observational study of the success and complications of 2546 external cephalic versions in low-risk pregnant women performed by trained midwives.
    Beuckens A; Rijnders M; Verburgt-Doeleman GH; Rijninks-van Driel GC; Thorpe J; Hutton EK
    BJOG; 2016 Feb; 123(3):415-23. PubMed ID: 25639281
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Mode of childbirth and neonatal outcome after external cephalic version: A prospective cohort study.
    Rosman AN; Vlemmix F; Ensing S; Opmeer BC; Te Hoven S; Velzel J; de Hundt M; van den Berg S; Rota H; van der Post JA; Mol BW; Kok M
    Midwifery; 2016 Aug; 39():44-8. PubMed ID: 27321719
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Routine use of external cephalic version in three hospitals.
    Regalia AL; Curiel P; Natale N; Galluzzi A; Spinelli G; Ghezzi GV; Tampieri A; Terzian E
    Birth; 2000 Mar; 27(1):19-24. PubMed ID: 10865556
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Fetal heart rate abnormalities during and after external cephalic version: Which fetuses are at risk and how are they delivered?
    Kuppens SM; Smailbegovic I; Houterman S; de Leeuw I; Hasaart TH
    BMC Pregnancy Childbirth; 2017 Oct; 17(1):363. PubMed ID: 29041923
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. [External cephalic version of breech fetus after 36 weeks of gestation - evaluation of efectiveness and complications].
    Hruban L; Janků P; Jordánová K; Gerychová R; Huser M; Ventruba P; Roztočil A
    Ceska Gynekol; 2017; 82(6):443-449. PubMed ID: 29302977
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Influence of the external cephalic version attempt on the Cesarean section rate: experience of a type 3 maternity hospital in France.
    Birene B; Ishaque U; Chrusciel J; Bonneau S; Gabriel R; Graesslin O
    Arch Gynecol Obstet; 2021 Feb; 303(2):443-454. PubMed ID: 32895742
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Predictors of a successful external cephalic version: A population-based study of Washington state births.
    Morgan ER; Hu AE; Brezak AMV; Rowley SS; Littman AJ; Hawes SE
    Women Birth; 2019 Jun; 32(3):e421-e426. PubMed ID: 30150151
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. External cephalic version: first report from Thailand.
    Chanrachakul B; Jaovisidha A; Herabutya Y; Srimanoi M; Puttharuksa J
    J Med Assoc Thai; 1999 Mar; 82(3):224-8. PubMed ID: 10410475
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Uterine torsion and fetal bradycardia associated with external cephalic version.
    Salani R; Theiler RN; Lindsay M
    Obstet Gynecol; 2006 Sep; 108(3 Pt 2):820-2. PubMed ID: 17018516
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Uptake of external cephalic version for term breech presentation: an Australian population study, 2002-2012.
    Bin YS; Roberts CL; Nicholl MC; Ford JB
    BMC Pregnancy Childbirth; 2017 Jul; 17(1):244. PubMed ID: 28747173
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Predictors for a successful external cephalic version: a single centre experience.
    Ebner F; Friedl TW; Leinert E; Schramm A; Reister F; Lato K; Janni W; DeGregorio N
    Arch Gynecol Obstet; 2016 Apr; 293(4):749-55. PubMed ID: 26437955
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Pregnancy outcome after successful external cephalic version for breech presentation at term.
    Lau TK; Lo KW; Rogers M
    Am J Obstet Gynecol; 1997 Jan; 176(1 Pt 1):218-23. PubMed ID: 9024118
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. [External cephalic version in cases of breech presentation: renaissance of a well-known procedure?].
    Schmidt M; Callies R; Kuhn U; Willruth A; Kimmig R
    Gynakol Geburtshilfliche Rundsch; 2009; 49(1):29-34. PubMed ID: 19204399
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 14.