148 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 16700655)
1. Bone ingrowths to press-fit and loose-fit implants: comparisons between titanium and hydroxyapatite.
Reikerås O; Johansson CB; Sundfeldt M
J Long Term Eff Med Implants; 2006; 16(2):157-64. PubMed ID: 16700655
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Hydroxyapatite enhances long-term fixation of titanium implants.
Reikerås O; Johansson CB; Sundfeldt M
J Long Term Eff Med Implants; 2006; 16(2):165-73. PubMed ID: 16700656
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Hydroxyapatite and carbon coatings for fixation of unloaded titanium implants.
Reikerås O; Johansson CB; Sundfeldt M
J Long Term Eff Med Implants; 2004; 14(6):443-54. PubMed ID: 15698373
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. The role of titanium implant surface modification with hydroxyapatite nanoparticles in progressive early bone-implant fixation in vivo.
Lin A; Wang CJ; Kelly J; Gubbi P; Nishimura I
Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants; 2009; 24(5):808-16. PubMed ID: 19865620
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Histological and mechanical comparison of hydroxyapatite-coated cobalt-chrome and titanium implants in the rabbit femur.
Friedman RJ; Bauer TW; Garg K; Jiang M; An YH; Draughn RA
J Appl Biomater; 1995; 6(4):231-5. PubMed ID: 8589507
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Hydroxyapatite coating enhances fixation of porous coated implants. A comparison in dogs between press fit and noninterference fit.
Søballe K; Hansen ES; Brockstedt-Rasmussen H; Pedersen CM; Bünger C
Acta Orthop Scand; 1990 Aug; 61(4):299-306. PubMed ID: 2402977
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Biomechanical and morphometric analysis of hydroxyapatite-coated implants with varying crystallinity.
Chang YL; Lew D; Park JB; Keller JC
J Oral Maxillofac Surg; 1999 Sep; 57(9):1096-108; discussion 1108-9. PubMed ID: 10484111
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. The relevance of hydroxyapatite and spongious titanium coatings in fixation of cementless stems. An experimental comparative study in rat femur employing histological and microangiographic techniques.
Pazzaglia UE; Brossa F; Zatti G; Chiesa R; Andrini L
Arch Orthop Trauma Surg; 1998; 117(4-5):279-85. PubMed ID: 9581262
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Hydroxyapatite-coating on titanium arc sprayed titanium implants.
Nakashima Y; Hayashi K; Inadome T; Uenoyama K; Hara T; Kanemaru T; Sugioka Y; Noda I
J Biomed Mater Res; 1997 Jun; 35(3):287-98. PubMed ID: 9138063
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. The correlation between osseointegration and bonding strength at the bone-implant interface: In-vivo & ex-vivo investigations on hydroxyapatite and hydroxyapatite/titanium coatings.
Ghadami F; Amani Hamedani M; Rouhi G; Saber-Samandari S; Mehdi Dehghan M; Farzad-Mohajeri S; Mashhadi-Abbas F
J Biomech; 2022 Nov; 144():111310. PubMed ID: 36162145
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Fixation of titanium and hydroxyapatite-coated implants in arthritic osteopenic bone.
Søballe K; Hansen ES; Brockstedt-Rasmussen H; Hjortdal VE; Juhl GI; Pedersen CM; Hvid I; Bünger C
J Arthroplasty; 1991 Dec; 6(4):307-16. PubMed ID: 1663154
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Comparison of tissue reaction and osteointegration of metal implants between hydroxyapatite/Ti alloy coat: an animal experimental study.
Itiravivong P; Promasa A; Laiprasert T; Techapongworachai T; Kuptniratsaikul S; Thanakit V; Heimann RB
J Med Assoc Thai; 2003 Jun; 86 Suppl 2():S422-31. PubMed ID: 12930020
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. In vivo comparison of the osseointegration of vacuum plasma sprayed titanium- and hydroxyapatite-coated implants.
Aebli N; Krebs J; Stich H; Schawalder P; Walton M; Schwenke D; Gruner H; Gasser B; Theis JC
J Biomed Mater Res A; 2003 Aug; 66(2):356-63. PubMed ID: 12889006
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. The effect of operative fit and hydroxyapatite coating on the mechanical and biological response to porous implants.
Dalton JE; Cook SD; Thomas KA; Kay JF
J Bone Joint Surg Am; 1995 Jan; 77(1):97-110. PubMed ID: 7822360
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Evaluation of titanium plasma-sprayed and plasma-sprayed hydroxyapatite implants in vivo.
Ong JL; Carnes DL; Bessho K
Biomaterials; 2004 Aug; 25(19):4601-6. PubMed ID: 15120505
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Bone response adjacent to calcium phosphate electrostatic spray deposition coated implants: an experimental study in goats.
Manders PJ; Wolke JG; Jansen JA
Clin Oral Implants Res; 2006 Oct; 17(5):548-53. PubMed ID: 16958695
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Intermittent administration of human parathyroid hormone (1-34) increases fixation of strontium-doped hydroxyapatite coating titanium implants via electrochemical deposition in ovariectomized rat femur.
Tao ZS; Zhou WS; Qiang Z; Tu KK; Huang ZL; Xu HM; Sun T; Lv YX; Cui W; Yang L
J Biomater Appl; 2016 Feb; 30(7):952-60. PubMed ID: 26482573
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. In vivo biocompatibility and mechanical study of novel bone-bioactive materials for prosthetic implantation.
Zhang XS; Revell PA; Evans SL; Tuke MA; Gregson PJ
J Biomed Mater Res; 1999 Aug; 46(2):279-86. PubMed ID: 10380007
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Ti implants with nanostructured and HA-coated surfaces for improved osseointegration.
Sirin HT; Vargel I; Kutsal T; Korkusuz P; Piskin E
Artif Cells Nanomed Biotechnol; 2016 May; 44(3):1023-30. PubMed ID: 26496822
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Hydroxyapatite ceramic coating for bone implant fixation. Mechanical and histological studies in dogs.
Søballe K
Acta Orthop Scand Suppl; 1993; 255():1-58. PubMed ID: 8237337
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
