These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

139 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 16701027)

  • 1. [Maximum acceptable weight of lift for manual lifting tasks].
    Chen J; Yang L
    Zhonghua Lao Dong Wei Sheng Zhi Ye Bing Za Zhi; 2006 Apr; 24(4):194-7. PubMed ID: 16701027
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Maximum acceptable weights for asymmetric lifting of Chinese females.
    Wu SP
    Appl Ergon; 2003 May; 34(3):215-24. PubMed ID: 12737921
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Maximum acceptable weight of lift by Chinese experienced male manual handlers.
    Wu SP
    Appl Ergon; 1997 Aug; 28(4):237-44. PubMed ID: 9414362
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. [A psychophysical evaluation of NIOSH Lifting Equation in a Chinese young male population: a pilot study].
    Xiao GB; Liang YX
    Zhonghua Lao Dong Wei Sheng Zhi Ye Bing Za Zhi; 2008 Jun; 26(6):341-5. PubMed ID: 18771617
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Postural effects on biomechanical and psychophysical weight-lifting limits.
    Chaffin DB; Page GB
    Ergonomics; 1994 Apr; 37(4):663-76. PubMed ID: 8187750
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. An evaluation of the NIOSH Lifting Equation: a psychophysical and biomechanical investigation.
    Elfeituri FE; Taboun SM
    Int J Occup Saf Ergon; 2002; 8(2):243-58. PubMed ID: 12067513
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Effect of background music on maximum acceptable weight of manual lifting tasks.
    Yu R
    Int J Occup Saf Ergon; 2014; 20(3):437-45. PubMed ID: 25189748
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Can Chinese MAWL be used for designing manual handling tasks?
    Chen YL
    AIHA J (Fairfax, Va); 2003; 64(1):117-20. PubMed ID: 12570404
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. The psychophysical lifting capacities of Chinese subjects.
    Lee YH; Wu SP; Hsu SH
    Ergonomics; 1995 Apr; 38(4):671-83. PubMed ID: 7729395
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Psychophysically determined asymmetrical lifting capabilities for different frequencies and containers.
    Lee TH
    Ind Health; 2005 Apr; 43(2):337-40. PubMed ID: 15895850
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Effects of box size, frequency of lifting, and height of lift on maximum acceptable weight of lift and heart rate for male university students in Iran.
    Abadi AS; Mazlomi A; Saraji GN; Zeraati H; Hadian MR; Jafari AH
    Electron Physician; 2015 Oct; 7(6):1365-71. PubMed ID: 26516443
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Maximum acceptable weight of lift reflects peak lumbosacral extension moments in a functional capacity evaluation test using free style, stoop and squat lifting.
    Kuijer PP; van Oostrom SH; Duijzer K; van Dieën JH
    Ergonomics; 2012; 55(3):343-9. PubMed ID: 22409171
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Psychophysically determined infrequent lifting capacity of Chinese participants.
    Wu SP
    Ergonomics; 1999 Jul; 42(7):952-63. PubMed ID: 10424184
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Asymmetric lifting capabilities for different container dimensions.
    Lee TH; Cheng TS
    Int J Occup Saf Ergon; 2011; 17(2):187-93. PubMed ID: 21679670
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Evaluation of the ability of power to predict low frequency lifting capacity.
    Dempsey PG; Ayoub MM; Westfall PH
    Ergonomics; 1998 Aug; 41(8):1222-41. PubMed ID: 9715677
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Effect of floor slope on submaximal lifting capacity.
    Wickel EE; Reiser RF
    Biomed Sci Instrum; 2004; 40():283-9. PubMed ID: 15133972
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. The accuracy of a 2D video-based lifting monitor.
    Wang X; Hu YH; Lu ML; Radwin RG
    Ergonomics; 2019 Aug; 62(8):1043-1054. PubMed ID: 31092146
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Effects of asymmetric dynamic and isometric liftings on strength/force and rating of perceived exertion.
    Hattori Y; Ono Y; Shimaoka M; Hiruta S; Kamijima M; Shibata E; Ichihara G; Ando S; Villaneuva MB; Takeuchi Y
    Ergonomics; 1996 Jun; 39(6):862-76. PubMed ID: 8681928
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Influence of lift moment in determining MAWL.
    Davis KG; Kirking BC; Gaudes LL; Yang J; Marras WS
    Hum Factors; 1997 Jun; 39(2):312-22. PubMed ID: 9302891
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Acceptable workloads for three common mining materials.
    Gallagher S; Hamrick CA
    Ergonomics; 1992 Sep; 35(9):1013-31. PubMed ID: 1387078
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 7.