BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

144 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 16701027)

  • 1. [Maximum acceptable weight of lift for manual lifting tasks].
    Chen J; Yang L
    Zhonghua Lao Dong Wei Sheng Zhi Ye Bing Za Zhi; 2006 Apr; 24(4):194-7. PubMed ID: 16701027
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Maximum acceptable weights for asymmetric lifting of Chinese females.
    Wu SP
    Appl Ergon; 2003 May; 34(3):215-24. PubMed ID: 12737921
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Maximum acceptable weight of lift by Chinese experienced male manual handlers.
    Wu SP
    Appl Ergon; 1997 Aug; 28(4):237-44. PubMed ID: 9414362
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. [A psychophysical evaluation of NIOSH Lifting Equation in a Chinese young male population: a pilot study].
    Xiao GB; Liang YX
    Zhonghua Lao Dong Wei Sheng Zhi Ye Bing Za Zhi; 2008 Jun; 26(6):341-5. PubMed ID: 18771617
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Postural effects on biomechanical and psychophysical weight-lifting limits.
    Chaffin DB; Page GB
    Ergonomics; 1994 Apr; 37(4):663-76. PubMed ID: 8187750
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. An evaluation of the NIOSH Lifting Equation: a psychophysical and biomechanical investigation.
    Elfeituri FE; Taboun SM
    Int J Occup Saf Ergon; 2002; 8(2):243-58. PubMed ID: 12067513
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Effect of background music on maximum acceptable weight of manual lifting tasks.
    Yu R
    Int J Occup Saf Ergon; 2014; 20(3):437-45. PubMed ID: 25189748
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Can Chinese MAWL be used for designing manual handling tasks?
    Chen YL
    AIHA J (Fairfax, Va); 2003; 64(1):117-20. PubMed ID: 12570404
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. The psychophysical lifting capacities of Chinese subjects.
    Lee YH; Wu SP; Hsu SH
    Ergonomics; 1995 Apr; 38(4):671-83. PubMed ID: 7729395
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Psychophysically determined asymmetrical lifting capabilities for different frequencies and containers.
    Lee TH
    Ind Health; 2005 Apr; 43(2):337-40. PubMed ID: 15895850
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Effects of box size, frequency of lifting, and height of lift on maximum acceptable weight of lift and heart rate for male university students in Iran.
    Abadi AS; Mazlomi A; Saraji GN; Zeraati H; Hadian MR; Jafari AH
    Electron Physician; 2015 Oct; 7(6):1365-71. PubMed ID: 26516443
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Maximum acceptable weight of lift reflects peak lumbosacral extension moments in a functional capacity evaluation test using free style, stoop and squat lifting.
    Kuijer PP; van Oostrom SH; Duijzer K; van Dieën JH
    Ergonomics; 2012; 55(3):343-9. PubMed ID: 22409171
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Psychophysically determined infrequent lifting capacity of Chinese participants.
    Wu SP
    Ergonomics; 1999 Jul; 42(7):952-63. PubMed ID: 10424184
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Asymmetric lifting capabilities for different container dimensions.
    Lee TH; Cheng TS
    Int J Occup Saf Ergon; 2011; 17(2):187-93. PubMed ID: 21679670
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Psychophysically determining the maximum acceptable weight of lift for polypropylene laminated bags.
    Chen YL; Ho TK
    Ind Health; 2016 Dec; 54(6):550-553. PubMed ID: 27181917
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Evaluation of the ability of power to predict low frequency lifting capacity.
    Dempsey PG; Ayoub MM; Westfall PH
    Ergonomics; 1998 Aug; 41(8):1222-41. PubMed ID: 9715677
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Effect of floor slope on submaximal lifting capacity.
    Wickel EE; Reiser RF
    Biomed Sci Instrum; 2004; 40():283-9. PubMed ID: 15133972
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. The accuracy of a 2D video-based lifting monitor.
    Wang X; Hu YH; Lu ML; Radwin RG
    Ergonomics; 2019 Aug; 62(8):1043-1054. PubMed ID: 31092146
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Effects of asymmetric dynamic and isometric liftings on strength/force and rating of perceived exertion.
    Hattori Y; Ono Y; Shimaoka M; Hiruta S; Kamijima M; Shibata E; Ichihara G; Ando S; Villaneuva MB; Takeuchi Y
    Ergonomics; 1996 Jun; 39(6):862-76. PubMed ID: 8681928
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Influence of lift moment in determining MAWL.
    Davis KG; Kirking BC; Gaudes LL; Yang J; Marras WS
    Hum Factors; 1997 Jun; 39(2):312-22. PubMed ID: 9302891
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 8.