These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

177 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 16701277)

  • 1. The evolution of supertrees.
    Bininda-Emonds OR
    Trends Ecol Evol; 2004 Jun; 19(6):315-22. PubMed ID: 16701277
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Supertree construction in the genomic age.
    Bininda-Emonds OR
    Methods Enzymol; 2005; 395():745-57. PubMed ID: 15865993
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Complete generic-level phylogenetic analyses of palms (Arecaceae) with comparisons of supertree and supermatrix approaches.
    Baker WJ; Savolainen V; Asmussen-Lange CB; Chase MW; Dransfield J; Forest F; Harley MM; Uhl NW; Wilkinson M
    Syst Biol; 2009 Apr; 58(2):240-56. PubMed ID: 20525581
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Performance of flip supertree construction with a heuristic algorithm.
    Eulenstein O; Chen D; Burleigh JG; Fernández-Baca D; Sanderson MJ
    Syst Biol; 2004 Apr; 53(2):299-308. PubMed ID: 15205054
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Comparative performance of supertree algorithms in large data sets using the soapberry family (Sapindaceae) as a case study.
    Buerki S; Forest F; Salamin N; Alvarez N
    Syst Biol; 2011 Jan; 60(1):32-44. PubMed ID: 21068445
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Supertrees join the mainstream of phylogenetics.
    Cotton JA; Wilkinson M
    Trends Ecol Evol; 2009 Jan; 24(1):1-3. PubMed ID: 19022523
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Explosions and hot spots in supertree methods.
    Day WH; McMorris FR; Wilkinson M
    J Theor Biol; 2008 Jul; 253(2):345-8. PubMed ID: 18472112
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. The shape of supertrees to come: tree shape related properties of fourteen supertree methods.
    Wilkinson M; Cotton JA; Creevey C; Eulenstein O; Harris SR; Lapointe FJ; Levasseur C; McInerney JO; Pisani D; Thorley JL
    Syst Biol; 2005 Jun; 54(3):419-31. PubMed ID: 16012108
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Using Robinson-Foulds supertrees in divide-and-conquer phylogeny estimation.
    Yu X; Le T; Christensen SA; Molloy EK; Warnow T
    Algorithms Mol Biol; 2021 Jun; 16(1):12. PubMed ID: 34183037
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. PhySIC_IST: cleaning source trees to infer more informative supertrees.
    Scornavacca C; Berry V; Lefort V; Douzery EJ; Ranwez V
    BMC Bioinformatics; 2008 Oct; 9():413. PubMed ID: 18834542
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Increasing data transparency and estimating phylogenetic uncertainty in supertrees: Approaches using nonparametric bootstrapping.
    Moore BR; Smith SA; Donoghue MJ
    Syst Biol; 2006 Aug; 55(4):662-76. PubMed ID: 16969942
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Reconstruction of large phylogenetic trees: a parallel approach.
    Du Z; Lin F; Roshan UW
    Comput Biol Chem; 2005 Aug; 29(4):273-80. PubMed ID: 16040277
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Trees from trees: construction of phylogenetic supertrees using clann.
    Creevey CJ; McInerney JO
    Methods Mol Biol; 2009; 537():139-61. PubMed ID: 19378143
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Robinson-Foulds supertrees.
    Bansal MS; Burleigh JG; Eulenstein O; Fernández-Baca D
    Algorithms Mol Biol; 2010 Feb; 5():18. PubMed ID: 20181274
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Maximum likelihood supertrees.
    Steel M; Rodrigo A
    Syst Biol; 2008 Apr; 57(2):243-50. PubMed ID: 18398769
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Is a new and general theory of molecular systematics emerging?
    Edwards SV
    Evolution; 2009 Jan; 63(1):1-19. PubMed ID: 19146594
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Assessment of the accuracy of matrix representation with parsimony analysis supertree construction.
    Bininda-Emonds OR; Sanderson MJ
    Syst Biol; 2001 Aug; 50(4):565-79. PubMed ID: 12116654
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Novel versus unsupported clades: assessing the qualitative support for clades in MRP supertrees.
    Bininda-Emonds OR
    Syst Biol; 2003 Dec; 52(6):839-48. PubMed ID: 14668120
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Imputing supertrees and supernetworks from quartets.
    Holland B; Conner G; Huber K; Moulton V
    Syst Biol; 2007 Feb; 56(1):57-67. PubMed ID: 17366137
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Building supertrees: an empirical assessment using the grass family (Poaceae).
    Salamin N; Hodkinson TR; Savolainen V
    Syst Biol; 2002 Feb; 51(1):136-50. PubMed ID: 11943096
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 9.