174 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 16701865)
21. In vitro biocompatibility of a novel Fe2O3 based glass ionomer cement.
Hurrell-Gillingham K; Reaney IM; Brook I; Hatton PV
J Dent; 2006 Sep; 34(8):533-8. PubMed ID: 16530912
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
22. Effects of incorporation of HA/ZrO(2) into glass ionomer cement (GIC).
Gu YW; Yap AU; Cheang P; Khor KA
Biomaterials; 2005 Mar; 26(7):713-20. PubMed ID: 15350775
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
23. [Comparison of the failure mode of various types of glass ionomer cements].
Wang Y; Zhang XC; Darvell BW
Zhonghua Kou Qiang Yi Xue Za Zhi; 2006 Nov; 41(11):687-9. PubMed ID: 17331368
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
24. The constitution, physical properties and biocompatibility of modified accelerated cement.
Camilleri J; Montesin FE; Juszczyk AS; Papaioannou S; Curtis RV; Donald FM; Ford TR
Dent Mater; 2008 Mar; 24(3):341-50. PubMed ID: 17659330
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
25. Changes of cement properties caused by mixing errors: the therapeutic range of different cement types.
Behr M; Rosentritt M; Loher H; Kolbeck C; Trempler C; Stemplinger B; Kopzon V; Handel G
Dent Mater; 2008 Sep; 24(9):1187-93. PubMed ID: 18372038
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
26. Zinc-based glass polyalkenoate cements with improved setting times and mechanical properties.
Boyd D; Clarkin OM; Wren AW; Towler MR
Acta Biomater; 2008 Mar; 4(2):425-31. PubMed ID: 17845868
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
27. Interaction between GIC and S. sanguis biofilms: antibacterial properties and changes of surface hardness.
Hengtrakool C; Pearson GJ; Wilson M
J Dent; 2006 Sep; 34(8):588-97. PubMed ID: 16540228
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
28. Modified polyalkenoate (glass-ionomer) cement--a study.
Bansal RK; Tewari US; Singh P; Murthy DV
J Oral Rehabil; 1995 Jul; 22(7):533-7. PubMed ID: 7562219
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
29. The optimisation of the initial viscosity of an encapsulated glass-ionomer restorative following different mechanical mixing regimes.
Fleming GJ; Kenny SM; Barralet JE
J Dent; 2006 Feb; 34(2):155-63. PubMed ID: 16085350
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
30. Does Addition of Propolis to Glass Ionomer Cement Alter its Physicomechanical Properties? An in Vitro Study.
Subramaniam P; Girish Babu KL; Neeraja G; Pillai S
J Clin Pediatr Dent; 2016; 40(5):400-3. PubMed ID: 27617381
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
31. Does Addition of Propolis to Glass Ionomer Cement Alter its Physicomechanical Properties? An In Vitro Study.
Subramaniam P; Girish Babu KL; Neeraja G; Pillai S
J Clin Pediatr Dent; 2017; 41(1):62-65. PubMed ID: 28052206
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
32. Effects of variation in particle size on biaxial flexural strength of two conventional glass-ionomer cements.
Kaplan AE; Williams J; Billington RW; Braden M; Pearson GJ
J Oral Rehabil; 2004 Apr; 31(4):373-8. PubMed ID: 15089945
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
33. Reinforcement of conventional glass-ionomer restorative material with short glass fibers.
Hammouda IM
J Mech Behav Biomed Mater; 2009 Jan; 2(1):73-81. PubMed ID: 19627810
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
34. Extrinsic energy sources affect hardness through depth during set of a glass-ionomer cement.
O'Brien T; Shoja-Assadi F; Lea SC; Burke FJ; Palin WM
J Dent; 2010 Jun; 38(6):490-5. PubMed ID: 20302904
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
35. The use of acoustic microscopy to study the mechanical properties of glass-ionomer cement.
Denisova LA; Maev RG; Poyurovskaya IY; Grineva TV; Denisov AF; Maeva EY; Bakulin EY
Dent Mater; 2004 May; 20(4):358-63. PubMed ID: 15019450
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
36. Effects of nanocrystalline calcium deficient hydroxyapatite incorporation in glass ionomer cements.
Goenka S; Balu R; Sampath Kumar TS
J Mech Behav Biomed Mater; 2012 Mar; 7():69-76. PubMed ID: 22340686
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
37. Effect of light-cured filled sealant on shear bond strength of metal and ceramic brackets bonded with a resin-modified glass ionomer cement.
Varlik SK; Ulusoy C
Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2009 Feb; 135(2):194-8. PubMed ID: 19201326
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
38. An in vitro study to assess the setting and surface crazing of conventional glass ionomer cement when layered over partially set mineral trioxide aggregate.
Ballal S; Venkateshbabu N; Nandini S; Kandaswamy D
J Endod; 2008 Apr; 34(4):478-80. PubMed ID: 18358902
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
39. An assessment of encapsulated versus hand-mixed glass ionomer restoratives.
Fleming GJ; Zala DM
Oper Dent; 2003; 28(2):168-77. PubMed ID: 12670073
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
40. Compressive strength of two newly developed glass-ionomer materials for use with the Atraumatic Restorative Treatment (ART) approach in class II cavities.
Koenraads H; Van der Kroon G; Frencken JE
Dent Mater; 2009 Apr; 25(4):551-6. PubMed ID: 19211138
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Previous] [Next] [New Search]
