These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

291 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 16701933)

  • 1. Review of the toxicity of chemical mixtures: Theory, policy, and regulatory practice.
    McCarty LS; Borgert CJ
    Regul Toxicol Pharmacol; 2006 Jul; 45(2):119-43. PubMed ID: 16701933
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Review of the toxicity of chemical mixtures containing at least one organochlorine.
    McCarty LS; Borgert CJ
    Regul Toxicol Pharmacol; 2006 Jul; 45(2):104-18. PubMed ID: 16701931
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Methods for deriving pesticide aquatic life criteria.
    TenBrook PL; Tjeerdema RS; Hann P; Karkoski J
    Rev Environ Contam Toxicol; 2009; 199():19-109. PubMed ID: 19110939
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Advancing environmental toxicology through chemical dosimetry: external exposures versus tissue residues.
    McCarty LS; Landrum PF; Luoma SN; Meador JP; Merten AA; Shephard BK; van Wezel AP
    Integr Environ Assess Manag; 2011 Jan; 7(1):7-27. PubMed ID: 21184567
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Safety and nutritional assessment of GM plants and derived food and feed: the role of animal feeding trials.
    EFSA GMO Panel Working Group on Animal Feeding Trials
    Food Chem Toxicol; 2008 Mar; 46 Suppl 1():S2-70. PubMed ID: 18328408
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Mode of action as a determining factor in additivity models for chemical mixture risk assessment.
    Lambert JC; Lipscomb JC
    Regul Toxicol Pharmacol; 2007 Dec; 49(3):183-94. PubMed ID: 17804132
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Strategy for genotoxicity testing: hazard identification and risk assessment in relation to in vitro testing.
    Thybaud V; Aardema M; Clements J; Dearfield K; Galloway S; Hayashi M; Jacobson-Kram D; Kirkland D; MacGregor JT; Marzin D; Ohyama W; Schuler M; Suzuki H; Zeiger E;
    Mutat Res; 2007 Feb; 627(1):41-58. PubMed ID: 17126066
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Characterizing the noncancer toxicity of mixtures using concepts from the TTC and quantitative models of uncertainty in mixture toxicity.
    Price PS; Hollnagel HM; Zabik JM
    Risk Anal; 2009 Nov; 29(11):1534-48. PubMed ID: 19886945
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Regulatory policy. Congress moves toward strengthening EPA's hand on chemical safety.
    Stokstad E
    Science; 2010 Apr; 328(5977):417. PubMed ID: 20413468
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Deriving uncertainty factors for threshold chemical contaminants in drinking water.
    Ritter L; Totman C; Krishnan K; Carrier R; Vézina A; Morisset V
    J Toxicol Environ Health B Crit Rev; 2007 Oct; 10(7):527-57. PubMed ID: 17934949
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Priority screening of toxic chemicals and industry sectors in the U.S. toxics release inventory: a comparison of the life cycle impact-based and risk-based assessment tools developed by U.S. EPA.
    Lim SR; Lam CW; Schoenung JM
    J Environ Manage; 2011 Sep; 92(9):2235-40. PubMed ID: 21561706
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Can mode of action predict mixture toxicity for risk assessment?
    Borgert CJ; Quill TF; McCarty LS; Mason AM
    Toxicol Appl Pharmacol; 2004 Dec; 201(2):85-96. PubMed ID: 15541748
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Chemical mixture toxicity testing with Vibrio fischeri: combined effects of binary mixtures for ten soft electrophiles.
    Dawson DA; Pöch G; Schultz TW
    Ecotoxicol Environ Saf; 2006 Oct; 65(2):171-80. PubMed ID: 16139365
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Nature and prevalence of non-additive toxic effects in industrially relevant mixtures of organic chemicals.
    Parvez S; Venkataraman C; Mukherji S
    Chemosphere; 2009 Jun; 75(11):1429-39. PubMed ID: 19344929
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Deciding which chemical mixtures risk assessment methods work best for what mixtures.
    Teuschler LK
    Toxicol Appl Pharmacol; 2007 Sep; 223(2):139-47. PubMed ID: 16997340
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Structural alerts--a new classification model to discriminate excess toxicity from narcotic effect levels of organic compounds in the acute daphnid assay.
    von der Ohe PC; Kühne R; Ebert RU; Altenburger R; Liess M; Schüürmann G
    Chem Res Toxicol; 2005 Mar; 18(3):536-55. PubMed ID: 15777094
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Alternative methods to safety studies in experimental animals: role in the risk assessment of chemicals under the new European Chemicals Legislation (REACH).
    Lilienblum W; Dekant W; Foth H; Gebel T; Hengstler JG; Kahl R; Kramer PJ; Schweinfurth H; Wollin KM
    Arch Toxicol; 2008 Apr; 82(4):211-36. PubMed ID: 18322675
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Improving REACH.
    Rudén C; Hansson SO
    Regul Toxicol Pharmacol; 2006 Feb; 44(1):33-42. PubMed ID: 16256254
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Combining occurrence and toxicity information to identify priorities for drinking-water mixture research.
    Ryker SJ; Small MJ
    Risk Anal; 2008 Jun; 28(3):653-66. PubMed ID: 18643823
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. The ratios of individual chemicals in a mixture determine the degree of joint effect: the climax hypothesis.
    Lin Z; Ping Z; Kong D; Yin K; Cai Z
    Arch Environ Contam Toxicol; 2005 Jul; 49(1):1-8. PubMed ID: 15883676
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 15.