These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

125 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 16703918)

  • 1. Care of the patient undergoing robotic-assisted laparoscopic pyeloplasty.
    Francis P; Winfield HN
    Urol Nurs; 2006 Apr; 26(2):110-5. PubMed ID: 16703918
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Minimally invasive surgical management of pelvic-ureteric junction obstruction: update on the current status of robotic-assisted pyeloplasty.
    Uberoi J; Disick GI; Munver R
    BJU Int; 2009 Dec; 104(11):1722-9. PubMed ID: 19519760
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Robotic-assisted laparoscopic dismembered pyeloplasty.
    Patel V
    Urology; 2005 Jul; 66(1):45-9. PubMed ID: 15992879
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Robotic pyeloplasty in the pediatric population.
    Casale P
    Curr Opin Urol; 2009 Jan; 19(1):97-101. PubMed ID: 19057224
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Robotic surgery for ureteropelvic junction obstruction.
    Lee RS; Borer JG
    Curr Opin Urol; 2006 Jul; 16(4):291-4. PubMed ID: 16770130
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Care of the patient undergoing robotic-assisted prostatectomy.
    Starnes DN; Sims TW
    Urol Nurs; 2006 Apr; 26(2):129-36. PubMed ID: 16703921
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Initial comparison of robotic-assisted laparoscopic versus open pyeloplasty in children.
    Yee DS; Shanberg AM; Duel BP; Rodriguez E; Eichel L; Rajpoot D
    Urology; 2006 Mar; 67(3):599-602. PubMed ID: 16504272
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Laparoscopic pyeloplasty for secondary ureteropelvic junction obstruction.
    Sundaram CP; Grubb RL; Rehman J; Yan Y; Chen C; Landman J; McDougall EM; Clayman RV
    J Urol; 2003 Jun; 169(6):2037-40. PubMed ID: 12771713
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Robot assisted laparoscopic pyeloplasty in patients of ureteropelvic junction obstruction with previously failed open surgical repair.
    Hemal AK; Mishra S; Mukharjee S; Suryavanshi M
    Int J Urol; 2008 Aug; 15(8):744-6. PubMed ID: 18786197
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Care of the patient undergoing radical cystectomy with a robotic approach.
    Overstreet DL; Sims TW
    Urol Nurs; 2006 Apr; 26(2):117-22. PubMed ID: 16703919
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Our experience with retroperitoneal and transperitoneal laparoscopic pyeloplasty for pelvi-ureteric junction obstruction.
    Davenport K; Minervini A; Timoney AG; Keeley FX
    Eur Urol; 2005 Dec; 48(6):973-7. PubMed ID: 16171940
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. [Technical aspects of laparoscopic robot-assisted pyeloplasty].
    Ferhi K; Rouprêt M; Rode J; Misraï V; Lebeau T; Richard F; Vaessen C
    Prog Urol; 2009 Oct; 19(9):606-10. PubMed ID: 19800549
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Parental satisfaction after open versus robot assisted laparoscopic pyeloplasty: results from modified Glasgow Children's Benefit Inventory Survey.
    Freilich DA; Penna FJ; Nelson CP; Retik AB; Nguyen HT
    J Urol; 2010 Feb; 183(2):704-8. PubMed ID: 20022046
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Robotic pyeloplasty: the University of California-Irvine experience.
    Etafy M; Pick D; Said S; Hsueh T; Kerbl D; Mucksavage P; Louie M; McDougall E; Clayman R
    J Urol; 2011 Jun; 185(6):2196-200. PubMed ID: 21497846
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Robotic assisted laparoscopic pyeloplasty.
    Thiel DD; Winfield HN
    Minerva Urol Nefrol; 2007 Jun; 59(2):167-77. PubMed ID: 17571053
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Robotic pyeloplasty: a critical appraisal.
    Badwan K; Bhayani S
    Int J Med Robot; 2007 Mar; 3():20-2. PubMed ID: 17441021
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Laparoscopic versus robotic pyeloplasty: man versus machine.
    Atalla MA; Dovey Z; Kavoussi LR
    Expert Rev Med Devices; 2010 Jan; 7(1):27-34. PubMed ID: 20021233
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Comparison of robot-assisted versus conventional laparoscopic transperitoneal pyeloplasty for patients with ureteropelvic junction obstruction: a single-center study.
    Bird VG; Leveillee RJ; Eldefrawy A; Bracho J; Aziz MS
    Urology; 2011 Mar; 77(3):730-4. PubMed ID: 21167564
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Laparoscopic pyeloplasty versus antegrade endopyelotomy: comparison in 100 patients and a new algorithm for the minimally invasive treatment of ureteropelvic junction obstruction.
    Ost MC; Kaye JD; Guttman MJ; Lee BR; Smith AD
    Urology; 2005 Nov; 66(5 Suppl):47-51. PubMed ID: 16194707
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Editorial comment on: Systematic review and meta-analysis of robotic-assisted versus conventional laparoscopic pyeloplasty for patients with ureteropelvic junction obstruction: effect on operative time, length of hospital stay, postoperative complications, and success rate.
    Novara G
    Eur Urol; 2009 Nov; 56(5):857-8. PubMed ID: 19359085
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 7.