These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

200 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 16704477)

  • 21. [Insertion problems, removal problems, and contraception failures with Implanon].
    Bensouda-Grimaldi L; Jonville-Béra AP; Beau-Salinas F; Llabres S; Autret-Leca E;
    Gynecol Obstet Fertil; 2005 Dec; 33(12):986-90. PubMed ID: 16321557
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 22. Safety and efficacy of Implanon, a single-rod implantable contraceptive containing etonogestrel.
    Funk S; Miller MM; Mishell DR; Archer DF; Poindexter A; Schmidt J; Zampaglione E;
    Contraception; 2005 May; 71(5):319-26. PubMed ID: 15854630
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 23. Office device to aid in Implanon insertion.
    Reiner IJ; Castracane VD
    Contraception; 2011 Nov; 84(5):445-6. PubMed ID: 22018118
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 24. Hormone-releasing contraceptive implants: our experience of complex removals using preoperative ultrasound.
    Vollans SR; Grainger A; O'Connor P; Limb D
    Contraception; 2015 Jul; 92(1):81-3. PubMed ID: 25889152
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 25. Management and localization strategies for the nonpalpable Implanon rod.
    Shulman LP; Gabriel H
    Contraception; 2006 Apr; 73(4):325-30. PubMed ID: 16531160
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 26. Removal of a Nonpalpable Etonogestrel Implant With Preprocedure Ultrasonography and Modified Vasectomy Clamp.
    Chen MJ; Creinin MD
    Obstet Gynecol; 2015 Nov; 126(5):935-938. PubMed ID: 26444124
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 27. Location and removal of non-palpable subdermal single-rod contraceptive implant.
    Buitrón-García-Figueroa R; Zancatl-Díaz ML; Basurto-Kuba EOP; Alvarez-Alfaro Ó
    Cir Cir; 2020; 88(4):485-488. PubMed ID: 32567592
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 28. A long-term study of the efficacy and acceptability of a single-rod hormonal contraceptive implant (Implanon) in healthy women in China.
    Zheng SR; Zheng HM; Qian SZ; Sang GW; Kaper RF
    Eur J Contracept Reprod Health Care; 1999 Jun; 4(2):85-93. PubMed ID: 10427483
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 29. [The progestagen-containing implant (Implanon); who is responsible for what?].
    van den Bosch WJ
    Ned Tijdschr Geneeskd; 2004 Sep; 148(36):1758-60. PubMed ID: 15495937
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 30. The effect of immediate postpartum compared to delayed postpartum and interval etonogestrel contraceptive implant insertion on removal rates for bleeding.
    Ireland LD; Goyal V; Raker CA; Murray A; Allen RH
    Contraception; 2014 Sep; 90(3):253-8. PubMed ID: 24973904
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 31. Implanon implant detection with ultrasound and magnetic resonance imaging.
    Westerway SC; Picker R; Christie J
    Aust N Z J Obstet Gynaecol; 2003 Oct; 43(5):346-50. PubMed ID: 14717309
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 32. Removal of a subdermal contraceptive implant (Implanon NXT) that migrated to the axilla by C-arm guidance: A case report and review of the literature.
    Park JU; Bae HS; Lee SM; Bae J; Park JW
    Medicine (Baltimore); 2017 Dec; 96(48):e8627. PubMed ID: 29310336
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 33. The pharmacokinetics and pharmacodynamics of Implanon, a single-rod etonogestrel contraceptive implant.
    Bennink HJ
    Eur J Contracept Reprod Health Care; 2000 Sep; 5 Suppl 2():12-20. PubMed ID: 11246602
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 34. Implanon. The new alternative.
    Cherry S
    Aust Fam Physician; 2002 Oct; 31(10):897-900. PubMed ID: 12404826
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 35. Indications for removal of etonogestrel implant within two years of use in Jos, Nigeria.
    Mutihir JT; Nyango DD
    East Afr Med J; 2010 Nov; 87(11):461-4. PubMed ID: 23457809
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 36. US referral center experience removing nonpalpable and difficult contraceptive implants with in-office ultrasonography: A case series.
    Mastey N; Matulich MC; Uhm S; Baker CC; Melo J; Chen MJ; Creinin MD
    Contraception; 2021 Jun; 103(6):428-430. PubMed ID: 33571492
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 37. Insertion and removal of Implanon.
    Mascarenhas L
    Contraception; 1998 Dec; 58(6 Suppl):79S-83S. PubMed ID: 10095977
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 38. Bioequivalence and x-ray visibility of a radiopaque etonogestrel implant versus a non-radiopaque implant: a 3-year, randomized, double-blind study.
    Schnabel P; Merki-Feld GS; Malvy A; Duijkers I; Mommers E; van den Heuvel MW
    Clin Drug Investig; 2012 Jun; 32(6):413-22. PubMed ID: 22540269
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 39. In situ breakage of Implanon®--two cases of a rare occurrence.
    Torres R; Mendes N; Machado AI; Marques C
    Contraception; 2013 Jul; 88(1):189-91. PubMed ID: 23218858
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 40. The impalpable Implanon: a case report.
    Stillwell S; Sheppard P; Searle S
    J Fam Plann Reprod Health Care; 2003 Jul; 29(3):156-7. PubMed ID: 12885313
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 10.