376 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 16704696)
61. Influence of test reliability on the screening performance of frequency-doubling perimetry.
Heeg GP; Jansonius NM
Am J Ophthalmol; 2006 Mar; 141(3):585-7. PubMed ID: 16490521
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
62. [The value of frequency doubling perimetry in glaucoma screening of aged 40 or more population].
Li JJ; Xu L; Zhang RX; Sun XY; Yang H; Zou Y; Zhao JL
Zhonghua Yan Ke Za Zhi; 2005 Mar; 41(3):221-5. PubMed ID: 15840362
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
63. Visual function-specific perimetry to identify glaucomatous visual loss using three different definitions of visual field abnormality.
Tafreshi A; Sample PA; Liebmann JM; Girkin CA; Zangwill LM; Weinreb RN; Lalezary M; Racette L
Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci; 2009 Mar; 50(3):1234-40. PubMed ID: 18978349
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
64. Detecting visual function abnormalities using the Swedish interactive threshold algorithm and matrix perimetry in eyes with glaucomatous appearance of the optic disc.
Sakata LM; Deleon-Ortega J; Arthur SN; Monheit BE; Girkin CA
Arch Ophthalmol; 2007 Mar; 125(3):340-5. PubMed ID: 17353404
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
65. Strategies for improving the diagnostic specificity of the frequency doubling perimeter.
Heeg GP; Stoutenbeek R; Jansonius NM
Acta Ophthalmol Scand; 2005 Feb; 83(1):53-6. PubMed ID: 15715557
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
66. Combined use of frequency doubling perimetry and polarimetric measurements of retinal nerve fiber layer in glaucoma detection.
Horn FK; Nguyen NX; Mardin CY; Jünemann AG
Am J Ophthalmol; 2003 Feb; 135(2):160-8. PubMed ID: 12566019
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
67. Performance of community-based glaucoma screening using Frequency Doubling Technology and Heidelberg Retinal Tomography.
Robin TA; Müller A; Rait J; Keeffe JE; Taylor HR; Mukesh BN
Ophthalmic Epidemiol; 2005 Jun; 12(3):167-78. PubMed ID: 16036475
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
68. Localized retinal nerve fiber layer defects and visual field abnormalities by humphrey matrix frequency doubling technology perimetry.
Lee MJ; Kim DM; Jeoung JW; Hwang SS; Kim TW; Park KH
Am J Ophthalmol; 2007 Jun; 143(6):1056-8. PubMed ID: 17524781
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
69. Identifying glaucomatous vision loss with visual-function-specific perimetry in the diagnostic innovations in glaucoma study.
Sample PA; Medeiros FA; Racette L; Pascual JP; Boden C; Zangwill LM; Bowd C; Weinreb RN
Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci; 2006 Aug; 47(8):3381-9. PubMed ID: 16877406
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
70. Frequency-doubling threshold perimetry in predicting glaucoma in a population-based study: The Beijing Eye Study.
Wang YX; Xu L; Zhang RX; Jonas JB
Arch Ophthalmol; 2007 Oct; 125(10):1402-6. PubMed ID: 17923550
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
71. [Frequency doubling perimetry in diagnosis of early glaucomatous optic nerve fiber damage].
Korzekwa W; Korzekwa M; Markowska J; Wójcik-Niklewska B; Romaniuk W; Korzekwa A; Michalska-Małecka K
Klin Oczna; 2004; 106(1-2 Suppl):222-4. PubMed ID: 15510506
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
72. Evaluation of decision rules for frequency-doubling technology screening tests.
Gardiner SK; Anderson DR; Fingeret M; McSoley JJ; Johnson CA
Optom Vis Sci; 2006 Jul; 83(7):432-7. PubMed ID: 16840859
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
73. Long-term reproducibility of screening for glaucoma with FDT-perimetry.
Horn FK; Link B; Mardin CY; Jünemann AG; Martus P
J Glaucoma; 2007 Aug; 16(5):448-55. PubMed ID: 17700287
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
74. Long-term fluctuation of standard automatic perimetry, pulsar perimetry and frequency-doubling technology in early glaucoma diagnosis.
Gonzalez-Hernandez M; de la Rosa MG; de la Vega RR; Hernandez-Vidal A
Ophthalmic Res; 2007; 39(6):338-43. PubMed ID: 17952009
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
75. Topographic relationship between frequency-doubling technology threshold values.
Fuertes-Lazaro I; Sanchez-Cano A; Ferreras A; Larrosa JM; Garcia-Martin E; Pablo LE
Acta Ophthalmol; 2012 Mar; 90(2):e144-50. PubMed ID: 22103468
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
76. Visual field changes after transient elevation of intraocular pressure in eyes with and without glaucoma.
Chan KC; Poostchi A; Wong T; Insull EA; Sachdev N; Wells AP
Ophthalmology; 2008 Apr; 115(4):667-72. PubMed ID: 17716733
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
77. Humphrey Matrix perimetry in optic nerve and chiasmal disorders: comparison with Humphrey SITA standard 24-2.
Huang CQ; Carolan J; Redline D; Taravati P; Woodward KR; Johnson CA; Wall M; Keltner JL
Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci; 2008 Mar; 49(3):917-23. PubMed ID: 18326712
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
78. Learning effect among perimetric novices with screening C-20-1 frequency doubling technology perimetry.
Brush MB; Chen PP
Am J Ophthalmol; 2004 Mar; 137(3):551-2. PubMed ID: 15013879
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
79. The reliability of frequency-doubling technology (FDT) perimetry in a pediatric population.
Becker K; Semes L
Optometry; 2003 Mar; 74(3):173-9. PubMed ID: 12645850
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
80. Learning effect of humphrey matrix frequency doubling technology perimetry in patients with ocular hypertension.
Centofanti M; Fogagnolo P; Oddone F; Orzalesi N; Vetrugno M; Manni G; Rossetti L
J Glaucoma; 2008 Sep; 17(6):436-41. PubMed ID: 18794676
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Previous] [Next] [New Search]
