BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

581 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 16706592)

  • 1. Mechanical characterization of anisotropic planar biological soft tissues using large indentation: a computational feasibility study.
    Cox MA; Driessen NJ; Bouten CV; Baaijens FP
    J Biomech Eng; 2006 Jun; 128(3):428-36. PubMed ID: 16706592
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Mechanical characterization of anisotropic planar biological soft tissues using finite indentation: experimental feasibility.
    Cox MA; Driessen NJ; Boerboom RA; Bouten CV; Baaijens FP
    J Biomech; 2008; 41(2):422-9. PubMed ID: 17897653
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Finite element implementation of a generalized Fung-elastic constitutive model for planar soft tissues.
    Sun W; Sacks MS
    Biomech Model Mechanobiol; 2005 Nov; 4(2-3):190-9. PubMed ID: 16075264
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. A finite element model for direction-dependent mechanical response to nanoindentation of cortical bone allowing for anisotropic post-yield behavior of the tissue.
    Carnelli D; Gastaldi D; Sassi V; Contro R; Ortiz C; Vena P
    J Biomech Eng; 2010 Aug; 132(8):081008. PubMed ID: 20670057
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Compressive properties of mouse articular cartilage determined in a novel micro-indentation test method and biphasic finite element model.
    Cao L; Youn I; Guilak F; Setton LA
    J Biomech Eng; 2006 Oct; 128(5):766-71. PubMed ID: 16995764
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. A rheological network model for the continuum anisotropic and viscoelastic behavior of soft tissue.
    Bischoff JE; Arruda EM; Grosh K
    Biomech Model Mechanobiol; 2004 Sep; 3(1):56-65. PubMed ID: 15278837
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Three-dimensional finite element simulations of the mechanical response of the fingertip to static and dynamic compressions.
    Wu JZ; Welcome DE; Dong RG
    Comput Methods Biomech Biomed Engin; 2006 Feb; 9(1):55-63. PubMed ID: 16880157
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. In vivo mechanical properties of thoracic aortic aneurysmal wall estimated from in vitro biaxial tensile test.
    Fukui T; Matsumoto T; Tanaka T; Ohashi T; Kumagai K; Akimoto H; Tabayashi K; Sato M
    Biomed Mater Eng; 2005; 15(4):295-305. PubMed ID: 16010038
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. The effects of aneurysm on the biaxial mechanical behavior of human abdominal aorta.
    Vande Geest JP; Sacks MS; Vorp DA
    J Biomech; 2006; 39(7):1324-34. PubMed ID: 15885699
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Nanoindentation testing and finite element simulations of cortical bone allowing for anisotropic elastic and inelastic mechanical response.
    Carnelli D; Lucchini R; Ponzoni M; Contro R; Vena P
    J Biomech; 2011 Jul; 44(10):1852-8. PubMed ID: 21570077
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. An efficient soft tissue characterization algorithm from in vivo indentation experiments for medical simulation.
    Kim J; Ahn B; De S; Srinivasan MA
    Int J Med Robot; 2008 Sep; 4(3):277-85. PubMed ID: 18727148
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. On the biaxial mechanical properties of the layers of the aortic valve leaflet.
    Stella JA; Sacks MS
    J Biomech Eng; 2007 Oct; 129(5):757-66. PubMed ID: 17887902
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Nonlinear elastic material property estimation of lower extremity residual limb tissues.
    Tönük E; Silver-Thorn MB
    IEEE Trans Neural Syst Rehabil Eng; 2003 Mar; 11(1):43-53. PubMed ID: 12797725
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. The non-linear mechanical properties of soft engineered biological tissues determined by finite spherical indentation.
    Cox MA; Gawlitta D; Driessen NJ; Oomens CW; Baaijens FP
    Comput Methods Biomech Biomed Engin; 2008 Oct; 11(5):585-92. PubMed ID: 19230150
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Evaluation of biaxial tension tests of soft tissues.
    Bursa J; Zemanek M
    Stud Health Technol Inform; 2008; 133():45-55. PubMed ID: 18376012
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Elastic and rupture properties of porcine aortic tissue measured using inflation testing.
    Marra SP; Kennedy FE; Kinkaid JN; Fillinger MF
    Cardiovasc Eng; 2006 Dec; 6(4):123-31. PubMed ID: 17136596
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Measuring viscoelasticity of soft samples using atomic force microscopy.
    Tripathy S; Berger EJ
    J Biomech Eng; 2009 Sep; 131(9):094507. PubMed ID: 19725704
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Digital image correlation and finite element modelling as a method to determine mechanical properties of human soft tissue in vivo.
    Moerman KM; Holt CA; Evans SL; Simms CK
    J Biomech; 2009 May; 42(8):1150-3. PubMed ID: 19362312
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Microplane constitutive model and computational framework for blood vessel tissue.
    Caner FC; Carol I
    J Biomech Eng; 2006 Jun; 128(3):419-27. PubMed ID: 16706591
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. A combined FEM/genetic algorithm for vascular soft tissue elasticity estimation.
    Khalil AS; Bouma BE; Kaazempur Mofrad MR
    Cardiovasc Eng; 2006 Sep; 6(3):93-102. PubMed ID: 16967325
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 30.