These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
179 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 16706773)
1. Level of confidence in diagnosis: clinical examination versus dermoscopy examination. Benvenuto-Andrade C; Dusza SW; Hay JL; Agero AL; Halpern AC; Kopf AW; Marghoob AA Dermatol Surg; 2006 May; 32(5):738-44. PubMed ID: 16706773 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Clinical selection of melanocytic lesions for dermoscopy decreases the identification of suspicious lesions in comparison with dermoscopy without clinical preselection. Seidenari S; Longo C; Giusti F; Pellacani G Br J Dermatol; 2006 May; 154(5):873-9. PubMed ID: 16634889 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. The influence of training on the recognition of gross features of dermoscopy images. Yucel A; Gunasti S; Aksungur VL Indian J Dermatol Venereol Leprol; 2010; 76(2):132-7. PubMed ID: 20228541 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Can automated dermoscopy image analysis instruments provide added benefit for the dermatologist? A study comparing the results of three systems. Perrinaud A; Gaide O; French LE; Saurat JH; Marghoob AA; Braun RP Br J Dermatol; 2007 Nov; 157(5):926-33. PubMed ID: 17854361 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Differences in dermoscopic images from nonpolarized dermoscope and polarized dermoscope influence the diagnostic accuracy and confidence level: a pilot study. Wang SQ; Dusza SW; Scope A; Braun RP; Kopf AW; Marghoob AA Dermatol Surg; 2008 Oct; 34(10):1389-95. PubMed ID: 18637816 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Sensitivity, specificity, and diagnostic accuracy of three dermoscopic algorithmic methods in the diagnosis of doubtful melanocytic lesions: the importance of light brown structureless areas in differentiating atypical melanocytic nevi from thin melanomas. Annessi G; Bono R; Sampogna F; Faraggiana T; Abeni D J Am Acad Dermatol; 2007 May; 56(5):759-67. PubMed ID: 17316894 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. A dermoscopy survey to assess who is using it and why it is or is not being used. Noor O; Nanda A; Rao BK Int J Dermatol; 2009 Sep; 48(9):951-2. PubMed ID: 19702978 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Dermoscopy improves accuracy of primary care physicians to triage lesions suggestive of skin cancer. Argenziano G; Puig S; Zalaudek I; Sera F; Corona R; Alsina M; Barbato F; Carrera C; Ferrara G; Guilabert A; Massi D; Moreno-Romero JA; Muñoz-Santos C; Petrillo G; Segura S; Soyer HP; Zanchini R; Malvehy J J Clin Oncol; 2006 Apr; 24(12):1877-82. PubMed ID: 16622262 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Value of the clinical history for different users of dermoscopy compared with results of digital image analysis. Blum A; Hofmann-Wellenhof R; Luedtke H; Ellwanger U; Steins A; Roehm S; Garbe C; Soyer HP J Eur Acad Dermatol Venereol; 2004 Nov; 18(6):665-9. PubMed ID: 15482291 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Digital epiluminescence dermoscopy for pigmented cutaneous lesions, primary care physicians, and telediagnosis: a useful tool? Grimaldi L; Silvestri A; Brandi C; Nisi G; Brafa A; Calabrò M; Campa A; D'Aniello C J Plast Reconstr Aesthet Surg; 2009 Aug; 62(8):1054-8. PubMed ID: 18547883 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Comparative performance of 4 dermoscopic algorithms by nonexperts for the diagnosis of melanocytic lesions. Dolianitis C; Kelly J; Wolfe R; Simpson P Arch Dermatol; 2005 Aug; 141(8):1008-14. PubMed ID: 16103330 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Spectrophotometric intracutaneous analysis versus dermoscopy for the diagnosis of pigmented skin lesions: prospective, double-blind study in a secondary reference centre. Glud M; Gniadecki R; Drzewiecki KT Melanoma Res; 2009 Jun; 19(3):176-9. PubMed ID: 19319002 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Dermoscopy patterns of halo nevi. Kolm I; Di Stefani A; Hofmann-Wellenhof R; Fink-Puches R; Wolf IH; Richtig E; Smolle J; Kerl H; Soyer HP; Zalaudek I Arch Dermatol; 2006 Dec; 142(12):1627-32. PubMed ID: 17178990 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Differences between polarized light dermoscopy and immersion contact dermoscopy for the evaluation of skin lesions. Benvenuto-Andrade C; Dusza SW; Agero AL; Scope A; Rajadhyaksha M; Halpern AC; Marghoob AA Arch Dermatol; 2007 Mar; 143(3):329-38. PubMed ID: 17372097 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Digital polarized light dermoscopy of clinically nonpigmented dermal nevi. Suwattee P; Schram SE; Warshaw EM Dermatol Surg; 2007 Sep; 33(9):1120-5. PubMed ID: 17760606 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Instrument-, age- and site-dependent variations of dermoscopic patterns of congenital melanocytic naevi: a multicentre study. Seidenari S; Pellacani G; Martella A; Giusti F; Argenziano G; Buccini P; Carli P; Catricalà C; De Giorgi V; Ferrari A; Ingordo V; Manganoni AM; Peris K; Piccolo D; Pizzichetta MA Br J Dermatol; 2006 Jul; 155(1):56-61. PubMed ID: 16792752 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related] [Next] [New Search]