These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

163 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 1670690)

  • 61. Privacy and autonomy: from Warren and Brandeis to Roe and Cruzan.
    Halper T
    J Med Philos; 1996 Apr; 21(2):121-35. PubMed ID: 8739068
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 62. The right to assisted suicide in Washington and Oregon: the courts won't allow a northwest passage.
    Kline RL
    Boston Univ Public Interest Law J; 1996; 5(2):213-37. PubMed ID: 16086524
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 63. Does right to privacy include right to die? Court to decide.
    Greenhouse L
    N Y Times Web; 1989 Jul; ():A1, A15. PubMed ID: 11647412
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 64. Cruzan:A hostage to technology.
    Cranford RE
    Hastings Cent Rep; 1990; 20(5):9-10. PubMed ID: 2228595
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 65. Reading the mystery passage narrowly: a legal, ethical and practical argument against physician assisted suicide.
    Hickey MB
    Notre Dame J Law Ethics Public Policy; 1999; 12(2):567-603. PubMed ID: 12755094
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 66. Court to rule on right to die in case of brain injury victim.
    N Y Times Web; 1989 Jul; ():14. PubMed ID: 11646726
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 67. Specific intent, substituted judgment and best interests: a nationwide analysis of an individual's right to die.
    Delaney JJ
    Pace Law Rev; 1991; 11(3):565-641. PubMed ID: 11651454
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 68. Cruzan v. Director, Missouri Department of Health: a clear and convincing call for comprehensive legislation to protect incompetent patients' rights.
    Suhr JN
    Am Univ Law Rev; 1991; 40(4):1477-519. PubMed ID: 11651350
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 69. A comparative analysis of the right to die in the Netherlands and the United States after Cruzan: reassessing the right of self-determination.
    DiCamillo JA
    Am Univ J Int Law Policy; 1992; 7(4):807-42. PubMed ID: 12091922
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 70. Beyond misguided paternalism: resuscitating the right to refuse medical treatment.
    Malloy SE
    Wake Forest Law Rev; 1998; 33():1035-91. PubMed ID: 11660805
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 71. Cruzan v Harmon, and In the Matter of O'Connor. Two anomalies.
    Gasner MR
    J Am Geriatr Soc; 1990 May; 38(5):594-9. PubMed ID: 2332578
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 72. Practicing medicine, fiduciary trust privacy, and public moral interloping after Cruzan.
    Rie MA
    J Med Philos; 1992 Dec; 17(6):647-64. PubMed ID: 1479310
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 73. Persistent vegetative state and the right to die: the United States and Britain.
    Jennett B; Dyer C
    BMJ; 1991 May; 302(6787):1256-8. PubMed ID: 2043853
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 74. Leaving the door ajar: the Supreme Court and assisted suicide.
    Urofsky MI
    Univ Richmond Law Rev; 1998 Mar; 32(2):313-405. PubMed ID: 11657162
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 75. The constitutional dimensions of the right to refuse medically assisted nutrition and hydration: an analysis of Cruzan.
    Karbal W
    J Health Hosp Law; 1990 Aug; 23(8):241-8, 256. PubMed ID: 10113286
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 76. From the Office of the General Counsel. Cruzan v Director of Missouri Department of Health: an ethical and legal perspective.
    Orentlicher D
    JAMA; 1989 Nov; 262(20):2928-30. PubMed ID: 2810631
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 77. Cruzan and caring for others.
    Lynn J; Glover J
    Hastings Cent Rep; 1990; 20(5):10-1. PubMed ID: 2228576
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 78. A line less reasonable: Cruzan and the looming debate over active euthanasia.
    Grant ER; Cleaver CA
    Md J Contemp Leg Issues; 1991; 2(2):99-256. PubMed ID: 11651215
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 79. Letting patients die: legal and moral reflections.
    Kadish SH
    Calif Law Rev; 1992 Jul; 80(4):857-88. PubMed ID: 11652646
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 80. Public policy in the wake of Cruzan: a case study of New York's health care proxy law.
    Miller TE
    Law Med Health Care; 1990; 18(4):360-7. PubMed ID: 2089189
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 9.