BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

152 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 16706920)

  • 1. Epistatic kinship a new measure of genetic diversity for short-term phylogenetic structures--theoretical investigations.
    Flury C; Tietze M; Simianer H
    J Anim Breed Genet; 2006 Jun; 123(3):159-71. PubMed ID: 16706920
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Modeling the effect of inbreeding among founders in linkage analysis.
    Hössjer O
    Theor Popul Biol; 2006 Sep; 70(2):146-63. PubMed ID: 16828135
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Haplotype kinship for three populations of the Goettingen minipig.
    Flury C; Weigend S; Ding X; Täubert H; Simianer H
    Genet Sel Evol; 2007; 39(2):159-79. PubMed ID: 17306199
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. A simulation-based analysis of chromosome segment sharing among a group of arbitrarily related individuals.
    Libiger O; Schork NJ
    Eur J Hum Genet; 2007 Dec; 15(12):1260-8. PubMed ID: 17700628
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Transmission disequilibrium test for quantitative trait loci detection in livestock populations.
    Kolbehdari D; Jansen GB; Schaeffer LR; Allen BO
    J Anim Breed Genet; 2006 Jun; 123(3):191-7. PubMed ID: 16706924
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. A fast algorithm for computing inbreeding coefficients in large populations.
    Sargolzaei M; Iwaisaki H; Colleau JJ
    J Anim Breed Genet; 2005 Oct; 122(5):325-31. PubMed ID: 16191041
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Kinship testing with X-chromosomal markers: mathematical and statistical issues.
    Krawczak M
    Forensic Sci Int Genet; 2007 Jun; 1(2):111-4. PubMed ID: 19083739
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. A new method to estimate relatedness from molecular markers.
    Fernández J; Toro MA
    Mol Ecol; 2006 May; 15(6):1657-67. PubMed ID: 16629818
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Linkage analysis, kinship, and the short-term evolution of chromosomes.
    Schork NJ; Thiel B; St Jean P
    J Exp Zool; 1998 Sep-Oct 1; 282(1-2):133-49. PubMed ID: 9723171
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Detecting low-quality markers using map expanders.
    Ekstrøm CT
    Genet Epidemiol; 2003 Nov; 25(3):214-24. PubMed ID: 14557989
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Linked vs unlinked markers: multilocus microsatellite haplotype-sharing as a tool to estimate gene flow and introgression.
    Koopman WJ; Li Y; Coart E; van de Weg WE; Vosman B; Roldán-Ruiz I; Smulders MJ
    Mol Ecol; 2007 Jan; 16(2):243-56. PubMed ID: 17217342
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. A general method to assess the utility of the X-chromosomal markers in kinship testing.
    Pinto N; Silva PV; Amorim A
    Forensic Sci Int Genet; 2012 Mar; 6(2):198-207. PubMed ID: 21592877
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. A computational method to detect epistatic effects contributing to a quantitative trait.
    Hanlon P; Lorenz A
    J Theor Biol; 2005 Aug; 235(3):350-64. PubMed ID: 15882697
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Use of linked loci as individuals or haplotypes for marker-assisted breed assignment.
    Stella A; Panzitta F; Gandini G; Boettcher PJ
    Anim Genet; 2008 Feb; 39(1):8-14. PubMed ID: 17956592
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Pedigree and marker information requirements to monitor genetic variability.
    Baumung R; Sölkner J
    Genet Sel Evol; 2003; 35(4):369-83. PubMed ID: 12927072
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Paternity exclusion power: comparative behaviour of autosomal and X-chromosomal markers in standard and deficient cases with inbreeding.
    Pinto N; Gusmão L; Egeland T; Amorim A
    Forensic Sci Int Genet; 2013 Feb; 7(2):290-5. PubMed ID: 23312390
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Increasing the efficiency of variance component quantitative trait loci analysis by using reduced-rank identity-by-descent matrices.
    Rönnegård L; Mischenko K; Holmgren S; Carlborg O
    Genetics; 2007 Jul; 176(3):1935-8. PubMed ID: 17483421
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Riverine status and genetic structure of Chilika buffalo of eastern India as inferred from cytogenetic and molecular marker-based analysis.
    Mishra BP; Kataria RS; Bulandi SS; Prakash B; Kathiravan P; Mukesh M; Sadana DK
    J Anim Breed Genet; 2009 Feb; 126(1):69-79. PubMed ID: 19207933
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Efficient inference of haplotypes from genotypes on a large animal pedigree.
    Baruch E; Weller JI; Cohen-Zinder M; Ron M; Seroussi E
    Genetics; 2006 Mar; 172(3):1757-65. PubMed ID: 16361242
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Haplotype reconstruction for scnp DNA: a consensus vote approach with extensive sequence data from populations of the migratory locust (Locusta migratoria).
    Huang ZS; Ji YJ; Zhang DX
    Mol Ecol; 2008 Apr; 17(8):1930-47. PubMed ID: 18346127
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 8.