341 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 16707300)
1. An evaluation of digital, split-site and traditional formats in conference poster sessions.
Bell C; Buckley EG; Evans P; Lloyd-Jones G
Med Teach; 2006 Mar; 28(2):175-9. PubMed ID: 16707300
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Developing a poster for disseminating research findings.
Sherbinski LA; Stroup DR
AANA J; 1992 Dec; 60(6):567-72. PubMed ID: 1284009
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Developing a poster about a clinical innovation. Part III: Presentation and evaluation.
Biancuzzo M
Clin Nurse Spec; 1994 Sep; 8(5):262-4. PubMed ID: 7533652
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Electronic poster presentations in BAPEN--a controlled evaluation.
Powell-Tuck J; Leach S; Maccready L
Clin Nutr; 2002 Jun; 21(3):261-3. PubMed ID: 12211171
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Communicating risk information: the influence of graphical display format on quantitative information perception-Accuracy, comprehension and preferences.
Price M; Cameron R; Butow P
Patient Educ Couns; 2007 Dec; 69(1-3):121-8. PubMed ID: 17905553
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Poster presentations: valuing all forms of evidence.
Halligan P
Nurse Educ Pract; 2008 Jan; 8(1):41-5. PubMed ID: 18086452
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. University/community poster sessions.
Botter ML; Giardino ER; Wolf ZR
Nursingconnections; 1990; 3(4):49-53. PubMed ID: 1705017
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Speed Posters: An Alternative to Traditional Poster and Podium Sessions.
Wagnes LD
J Contin Educ Nurs; 2016 Aug; 47(8):344-6. PubMed ID: 27467306
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Evaluation of electronic versus traditional format poster presentations.
Shin SJ
Med Educ; 2012 May; 46(5):519-20. PubMed ID: 22515778
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
10. The art and science of medical poster presentation.
Kaimal S; Thappa DM
Indian J Dermatol Venereol Leprol; 2010; 76(6):718-20. PubMed ID: 21079329
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
11. [The poster, an intelligent choice for scientific communication].
Lauzon S; Goulet C; Faucher B
Infirm Que; 1997; 4(6):31-8. PubMed ID: 9287569
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. In the eye of the beholder: making the most of poster presentations--Part 2.
Crooks DL; Kilpatrick M
Can Oncol Nurs J; 1998 Aug; 8(3):154-9. PubMed ID: 9814152
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. A cost-benefit analysis and method of creating high-quality posters for a low cost.
Karamzadeh AM; Wong BJ; Crumley RL
Laryngoscope; 2002 Jan; 112(1):21-2. PubMed ID: 11802033
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. A rating scale to evaluate research posters.
Bushy A
Nurse Educ; 1991; 16(1):11-5. PubMed ID: 1703648
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Visual literacy in the online environment.
Mixer SJ; McFarland MR; McInnis LA
Nurs Clin North Am; 2008 Dec; 43(4):575-82, vii. PubMed ID: 18940414
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Animated cell biology: a quick and easy method for making effective, high-quality teaching animations.
O'Day DH
CBE Life Sci Educ; 2006; 5(3):255-63. PubMed ID: 17012217
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. The focused use of posters for graduate education in the complex technological nursing environment.
Pelletier D
Nurse Educ Today; 1993 Oct; 13(5):382-8. PubMed ID: 7694062
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Preparing and presenting effective research posters.
Miller JE
Health Serv Res; 2007 Feb; 42(1 Pt 1):311-28. PubMed ID: 17355594
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Getting the most out of poster presentation.
Larrabee JH
Nurs Qual Connect; 1994; 4(2):11-2. PubMed ID: 7539320
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
20. Poster sessions and educational exhibits. How are they alike? How are they different?
Alkire K; Carson C
Oncol Nurs Forum; 1986; 13(2):104. PubMed ID: 2419879
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
