These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
171 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 16707529)
1. Integrated monitoring and analysis for early warning of patient deterioration. Tarassenko L; Hann A; Young D Br J Anaesth; 2006 Jul; 97(1):64-8. PubMed ID: 16707529 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Integrated monitoring and analysis for early warning of patient deterioration. Ismail F; Davies M Br J Anaesth; 2007 Jan; 98(1):149-50; author reply 150-2. PubMed ID: 17158134 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
3. Use of a novel electronic maternal surveillance system to generate automated alerts on the labor and delivery unit. Klumpner TT; Kountanis JA; Langen ES; Smith RD; Tremper KK BMC Anesthesiol; 2018 Jun; 18(1):78. PubMed ID: 29945569 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Defining the incidence of cardiorespiratory instability in patients in step-down units using an electronic integrated monitoring system. Hravnak M; Edwards L; Clontz A; Valenta C; Devita MA; Pinsky MR Arch Intern Med; 2008 Jun; 168(12):1300-8. PubMed ID: 18574087 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Feasibility of continuous monitoring of vital signs in surgical patients on a general ward: an observational cohort study. Leenen JPL; Dijkman EM; van Dijk JD; van Westreenen HL; Kalkman C; Schoonhoven L; Patijn GA BMJ Open; 2021 Feb; 11(2):e042735. PubMed ID: 33597138 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. The effect of technical filtering and clinical criteria on alert rates from continuous vital sign monitoring in the general ward. Kjærgaard K; Mølgaard J; Rasmussen SM; Meyhoff CS; Aasvang EK Hosp Pract (1995); 2023 Dec; 51(5):295-302. PubMed ID: 38126772 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Quantifying physiological stability in the general ward using continuous vital signs monitoring: the circadian kernel density estimator. Rasmussen SS; Grønbæk KK; Mølgaard J; Haahr-Raunkjær C; Meyhoff CS; Aasvang EK; Sørensen HBD J Clin Monit Comput; 2023 Dec; 37(6):1607-1617. PubMed ID: 37266711 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Evaluation of the effects of implementing an electronic early warning score system: protocol for a stepped wedge study. Bonnici T; Gerry S; Wong D; Knight J; Watkinson P BMC Med Inform Decis Mak; 2016 Feb; 16():19. PubMed ID: 26860362 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Effectiveness of continuous or intermittent vital signs monitoring in preventing adverse events on general wards: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Cardona-Morrell M; Prgomet M; Turner RM; Nicholson M; Hillman K Int J Clin Pract; 2016 Oct; 70(10):806-824. PubMed ID: 27582503 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. How to avoid catastrophic events on the ward. Bein B; Seewald S; Gräsner JT Best Pract Res Clin Anaesthesiol; 2016 Jun; 30(2):237-45. PubMed ID: 27396810 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Analysis of a data-fusion system for continuous vital sign monitoring in an emergency department. Wilson SJ; Wong D; Pullinger RM; Way R; Clifton DA; Tarassenko L Eur J Emerg Med; 2016 Feb; 23(1):28-32. PubMed ID: 25010925 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. ViEWS--Towards a national early warning score for detecting adult inpatient deterioration. Prytherch DR; Smith GB; Schmidt PE; Featherstone PI Resuscitation; 2010 Aug; 81(8):932-7. PubMed ID: 20637974 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Evaluation of an automated surveillance system using trigger alerts to prevent adverse drug events in the intensive care unit and general ward. DiPoto JP; Buckley MS; Kane-Gill SL Drug Saf; 2015 Mar; 38(3):311-7. PubMed ID: 25711668 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Comparing Continuous with Periodic Vital Sign Scoring for Clinical Deterioration Using a Patient Data Model. Peelen RV; Eddahchouri Y; Koeneman M; Melis R; van Goor H; Bredie SJH J Med Syst; 2023 May; 47(1):60. PubMed ID: 37154986 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. The rise of ward monitoring: opportunities and challenges for critical care specialists. Michard F; Bellomo R; Taenzer A Intensive Care Med; 2019 May; 45(5):671-673. PubMed ID: 30259073 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
16. Dynamic and Personalized Risk Forecast in Step-Down Units. Implications for Monitoring Paradigms. Chen L; Ogundele O; Clermont G; Hravnak M; Pinsky MR; Dubrawski AW Ann Am Thorac Soc; 2017 Mar; 14(3):384-391. PubMed ID: 28033032 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Aggregate National Early Warning Score (NEWS) values are more important than high scores for a single vital signs parameter for discriminating the risk of adverse outcomes. Jarvis S; Kovacs C; Briggs J; Meredith P; Schmidt PE; Featherstone PI; Prytherch DR; Smith GB Resuscitation; 2015 Feb; 87():75-80. PubMed ID: 25433295 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Evaluation of Electronic Medical Record Vital Sign Data Versus a Commercially Available Acuity Score in Predicting Need for Critical Intervention at a Tertiary Children's Hospital. da Silva YS; Hamilton MF; Horvat C; Fink EL; Palmer F; Nowalk AJ; Winger DG; Clark RS Pediatr Crit Care Med; 2015 Sep; 16(7):644-51. PubMed ID: 25901545 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Early recognition of acutely deteriorating patients in non-intensive care units: assessment of an innovative monitoring technology. Zimlichman E; Szyper-Kravitz M; Shinar Z; Klap T; Levkovich S; Unterman A; Rozenblum R; Rothschild JM; Amital H; Shoenfeld Y J Hosp Med; 2012 Oct; 7(8):628-33. PubMed ID: 22865462 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. A review, and performance evaluation, of single-parameter "track and trigger" systems. Smith GB; Prytherch DR; Schmidt PE; Featherstone PI; Higgins B Resuscitation; 2008 Oct; 79(1):11-21. PubMed ID: 18620794 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related] [Next] [New Search]