These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

126 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 16707867)

  • 21. Digital camera resolution and proximal caries detection.
    Prapayasatok S; Janhom A; Verochana K; Pramojanee S
    Dentomaxillofac Radiol; 2006 Jul; 35(4):253-7. PubMed ID: 16798921
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 22. Occlusal caries depth measurements obtained by five different imaging modalities.
    Kamburoğlu K; Kurt H; Kolsuz E; Öztaş B; Tatar I; Çelik HH
    J Digit Imaging; 2011 Oct; 24(5):804-13. PubMed ID: 21116675
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 23. Comparing the performance of storage phosphor plate and Insight film images for the detection of proximal caries depth.
    Crombie K; Parker ME; Nortje CJ; Sanderink GC
    SADJ; 2009 Nov; 64(10):452, 454-6, 458-9. PubMed ID: 20306863
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 24. Detection of approximal caries with a storage phosphor system. A comparison of enhanced digital images with dental X-ray film.
    Møystad A; Svanaes DB; Risnes S; Larheim TA; Gröndahl HG
    Dentomaxillofac Radiol; 1996 Sep; 25(4):202-6. PubMed ID: 9084274
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 25. Accuracy of caries detection with four storage phosphor systems and E-speed radiographs.
    Hintze H; Wenzel A; Frydenberg M
    Dentomaxillofac Radiol; 2002 May; 31(3):170-5. PubMed ID: 12058264
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 26. Does a combination of two radiographs increase accuracy in detecting acid-induced periapical lesions and does it approach the accuracy of cone-beam computed tomography scanning?
    Soğur E; Gröndahl HG; Baksı BG; Mert A
    J Endod; 2012 Feb; 38(2):131-6. PubMed ID: 22244624
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 27. Extraoral radiographic imaging of primary caries.
    Clifton TL; Tyndall DA; Ludlow JB
    Dentomaxillofac Radiol; 1998 Jul; 27(4):193-8. PubMed ID: 9780894
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 28. Should cavitation in proximal surfaces be reported in cone beam computed tomography examination?
    Sansare K; Singh D; Sontakke S; Karjodkar F; Saxena V; Frydenberg M; Wenzel A
    Caries Res; 2014; 48(3):208-13. PubMed ID: 24481006
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 29. [Accuracy of computer aided measurement for detecting dental proximal caries lesions in images of cone-beam computed tomography].
    Zhang ZL; Li JP; Li G; Ma XC
    Zhonghua Kou Qiang Yi Xue Za Zhi; 2017 Feb; 52(2):103-108. PubMed ID: 28253585
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 30. Comparative diagnostic performance of TACT slices and its multiple source images: an in vitro study.
    Abreu M; Yi-Ching L; Abreu AL
    Dentomaxillofac Radiol; 2004 Mar; 33(2):93-7. PubMed ID: 15314000
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 31. Influence of the number of basis images and projection array on caries detection using tuned aperture computed tomography (TACT).
    Abreu M; Tyndall DA; Ludlow JB; Nortjé CJ
    Dentomaxillofac Radiol; 2002 Jan; 31(1):24-31. PubMed ID: 11803385
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 32. Approximal carious lesion depth assessment with insight and ultraspeed films.
    Güngör K; Erten H; Akarslan ZZ; Celik I; Semiz M
    Oper Dent; 2005; 30(1):58-62. PubMed ID: 15765958
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 33. A comparative study of different radiographic methods for detecting occlusal caries lesions.
    Tarım Ertas E; Küçükyılmaz E; Ertaş H; Savaş S; Yırcalı Atıcı M
    Caries Res; 2014; 48(6):566-74. PubMed ID: 25073755
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 34. Comparison of microscopy and radiography as gold standards in radiographic caries diagnosis.
    Wenzel A; Hintze H
    Dentomaxillofac Radiol; 1999 May; 28(3):182-5. PubMed ID: 10740474
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 35. Scanning resolution and the detection of approximal caries.
    Janhom A; van Ginkel FC; van Amerongen JP; van der Stelt PF
    Dentomaxillofac Radiol; 2001 May; 30(3):166-71. PubMed ID: 11420630
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 36. Diagnostic accuracy of cone beam computed tomography scans compared with intraoral image modalities for detection of caries lesions.
    Haiter-Neto F; Wenzel A; Gotfredsen E
    Dentomaxillofac Radiol; 2008 Jan; 37(1):18-22. PubMed ID: 18195250
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 37. Diagnostic accuracy of different imaging modalities in detection of proximal caries.
    Senel B; Kamburoglu K; Uçok O; Yüksel SP; Ozen T; Avsever H
    Dentomaxillofac Radiol; 2010 Dec; 39(8):501-11. PubMed ID: 21062944
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 38. Evaluation of a limited cone-beam volumetric imaging system: comparison with film radiography in detecting incipient proximal caries.
    Tsuchida R; Araki K; Okano T
    Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol Endod; 2007 Sep; 104(3):412-6. PubMed ID: 17618136
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 39. Comparison of direct digital and conventional imaging with Ekta Speed Plus and INSIGHT films for the detection of approximal caries.
    de Araujo EA; Castilho JC; Medici Filho E; de Moraes ME
    Am J Dent; 2005 Aug; 18(4):241-4. PubMed ID: 16296430
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 40. Radiographic detection of approximal caries: a comparison of dental films and digital imaging systems.
    Syriopoulos K; Sanderink GC; Velders XL; van der Stelt PF
    Dentomaxillofac Radiol; 2000 Sep; 29(5):312-8. PubMed ID: 10980568
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 7.