BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

299 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 16708049)

  • 1. Statistical power of association using the extreme discordant phenotype design.
    Zhang G; Nebert DW; Chakraborty R; Jin L
    Pharmacogenet Genomics; 2006 Jun; 16(6):401-13. PubMed ID: 16708049
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Detailed analysis of the relative power of direct and indirect association studies and the implications for their interpretation.
    Moskvina V; O'Donovan MC
    Hum Hered; 2007; 64(1):63-73. PubMed ID: 17483598
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Equivalence of three score tests for association mapping of quantitative trait loci under selective genotyping.
    Tang Y
    Genet Epidemiol; 2010 Jul; 34(5):522-7. PubMed ID: 20552655
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Susceptibility of biallelic haplotype and genotype frequencies to genotyping error.
    Moskvina V; Schmidt KM
    Biometrics; 2006 Dec; 62(4):1116-23. PubMed ID: 17156286
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. New joint covariance- and marginal-based tests for association and linkage for quantitative traits for random and non-random sampling.
    Tiwari HK; Holt J; George V; Beasley TM; Amos CI; Allison DB
    Genet Epidemiol; 2005 Jan; 28(1):48-57. PubMed ID: 15558568
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Combined linkage and association mapping of quantitative trait Loci with missing completely at random genotype data.
    Fan R; Liu L; Jung J; Zhong M
    Behav Genet; 2008 May; 38(3):316-36. PubMed ID: 18306033
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. QTL mapping with discordant and concordant sibling pairs: new statistics and new design strategies.
    Szatkiewicz JP; Feingold E
    Genet Epidemiol; 2005 May; 28(4):326-40. PubMed ID: 15662636
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Power of QTL detection using association tests with family controls.
    Hernández-Sánchez J; Haley CS; Visscher PM
    Eur J Hum Genet; 2003 Nov; 11(11):819-27. PubMed ID: 14571265
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. What SNP genotyping errors are most costly for genetic association studies?
    Kang SJ; Gordon D; Finch SJ
    Genet Epidemiol; 2004 Feb; 26(2):132-41. PubMed ID: 14748013
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Repeated measurement sampling in genetic association analysis with genotyping errors.
    Lai R; Zhang H; Yang Y
    Genet Epidemiol; 2007 Feb; 31(2):143-53. PubMed ID: 17187401
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. The application of the entropy-based statistic for genomic association study of QTL.
    Xiang Y; Li Y; Liu Z; Sun Z
    J Genet Genomics; 2008 Mar; 35(3):183-8. PubMed ID: 18355762
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. The value of relatives with phenotypes but missing genotypes in association studies for quantitative traits.
    Visscher PM; Duffy DL
    Genet Epidemiol; 2006 Jan; 30(1):30-6. PubMed ID: 16355405
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Detecting susceptibility genes in case-control studies using set association.
    Kim S; Zhang K; Sun F
    BMC Genet; 2003 Dec; 4 Suppl 1(Suppl 1):S9. PubMed ID: 14975077
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Novel sib pair selection strategy increases power in quantitative association analysis.
    Kwan JS; Cherny SS; Kung AW; Sham PC
    Behav Genet; 2009 Sep; 39(5):571-9. PubMed ID: 19568925
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Mapping quantitative trait loci using linkage disequilibrium: marker- versus trait-based methods.
    Tenesa A; Visscher PM; Carothers AD; Knott SA
    Behav Genet; 2005 Mar; 35(2):219-28. PubMed ID: 15685434
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Bivariate combined linkage and association mapping of quantitative trait loci.
    Jung J; Zhong M; Liu L; Fan R
    Genet Epidemiol; 2008 Jul; 32(5):396-412. PubMed ID: 18278817
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Testing association with interactions by partitioning chi-squares.
    Yang Y; He C; Ott J
    Ann Hum Genet; 2009 Jan; 73(1):109-17. PubMed ID: 18798840
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Quantifying the amount of missing information in genetic association studies.
    Nicolae DL
    Genet Epidemiol; 2006 Dec; 30(8):703-17. PubMed ID: 16986163
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. A likelihood approach for quantitative-trait-locus mapping with selected pedigrees.
    Wang K
    Biometrics; 2005 Jun; 61(2):465-73. PubMed ID: 16011693
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Genetic model testing and statistical power in population-based association studies of quantitative traits.
    Lettre G; Lange C; Hirschhorn JN
    Genet Epidemiol; 2007 May; 31(4):358-62. PubMed ID: 17352422
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 15.